• Our booking engine at tickets.railforums.co.uk (powered by TrainSplit) helps support the running of the forum with every ticket purchase! Find out more and ask any questions/give us feedback in this thread!

Class 379 updates (all are OFF LEASE)

Status
Not open for further replies.

Peregrine 4903

Established Member
Joined
18 Aug 2019
Messages
1,455
Location
London
Southern Wimbledon Loop services, Guildford services and GWR’s Brighton services are all being culled. Stuff which runs on lines where there plentiful other duplicate services are in trouble yes. Thameslink to Grinstead, Littlehampton and Eastbourne are unlikely to last much longer.
Thameslink don't run to Eastbourne. Southern's Wimbledon Loop and Guildford services were already culled since 2020.

Just wait and see when the May 22 timetable gets uploaded.
 
Sponsor Post - registered members do not see these adverts; click here to register, or click here to log in
R

RailUK Forums

Southern Dvr

Member
Joined
13 Oct 2010
Messages
876
Thameslink don't run to Eastbourne. Southern's Wimbledon Loop and Guildford services were already culled since 2020.

Just wait and see when the May 22 timetable gets uploaded.
Thameslink were supposed to go to Eastbourne.

Wimbledon Loop services were supposed to return, until recently drivers were being route refreshed on it.

Guildford has indeed been dead since 2020. The conductors all came into work one day and found their route cards no longer had it on there.

What is shocking is that the frontline staff haven’t been told any of this officially and will soon find out at the same time as the public.
 

physics34

Established Member
Joined
1 Dec 2013
Messages
3,696
Southern Wimbledon Loop services, Guildford services and GWR’s Brighton services are all being culled. Stuff which runs on lines where there plentiful other duplicate services are in trouble yes. Thameslink to Grinstead, Littlehampton and Eastbourne are unlikely to last much longer.
Grinstead people will want their London Bridge services back though. They seem to have kittens about them when they dont run
 

Southern Dvr

Member
Joined
13 Oct 2010
Messages
876
Grinstead people will want their London Bridge services back though. They seem to have kittens about them when they dont run
But that’s the point, they only want London Bridge services. Not Bedford or Luton etc. Therefore they could be run by the incumbent operator on that route.
 

physics34

Established Member
Joined
1 Dec 2013
Messages
3,696
But that’s the point, they only want London Bridge services. Not Bedford or Luton etc. Therefore they could be run by the incumbent operator on that route.
Or maybe Southern dvrs on the route shouldve signed 700s.... something suggested many moons ago lol
 

Southern Dvr

Member
Joined
13 Oct 2010
Messages
876
Or maybe Southern dvrs on the route shouldve signed 700s.... something suggested many moons ago lol
We digress massively here but I think there was a logistical reason why Southern was kept distanced from TL/GN. Would be easier to cut it completely if there wasn’t an amalgamation.
 

Nicholas Lewis

Established Member
Joined
9 Aug 2019
Messages
6,099
Location
Surrey
Thameslink to Grinstead, Littlehampton and Eastbourne are unlikely to last much longer.
They won't get away without providing a London Bridge services in the rush hour but could be managed by switching some of the Vics to cover then reverting back to Vic off peak I guess.
Sadly, I suspect that DfT will be more willing to take a hit on overcrowding than to ask the Treasury for more money.
For sure they won't care about some overcrowding especially as it won't be five days a week.
 

JonathanH

Veteran Member
Joined
29 May 2011
Messages
18,758
They won't get away without providing a London Bridge services in the rush hour but could be managed by switching some of the Vics to cover then reverting back to Vic off peak I guess.
They will get away with it - same platform change at East Croydon. They are getting away with 1tph to East Grinstead during the day at the moment and can simply explain that there isn't enough revenue to justify 4tph to East Grinstead peak any more.
 

Peregrine 4903

Established Member
Joined
18 Aug 2019
Messages
1,455
Location
London
They will get away with it - same platform change at East Croydon. They are getting away with 1tph to East Grinstead during the day at the moment and can simply explain that there isn't enough revenue to justify 4tph to East Grinstead peak any more.
Ummm, I wouldn't be sure about that.
 

Nicholas Lewis

Established Member
Joined
9 Aug 2019
Messages
6,099
Location
Surrey
They will get away with it - same platform change at East Croydon. They are getting away with 1tph to East Grinstead during the day at the moment and can simply explain that there isn't enough revenue to justify 4tph to East Grinstead peak any more.
E.Grinstead Is returning to half hourly in the peak from next Monday upto 1000hrs and then between 1500-2000 so not that many turns to reinstate to make it half all day probably from May i suggest. TLks have to be reinstated no way that a L.Bdge service can't be provided in the rush hour its a big chunk of the traffic.
Edit: One TLk shown from May 22 and half hourly service although many are Q paths so looks like they are covering themselves. SN also cutting back many metro services so not sure they will need any extra stock anytime soon.
 
Last edited:

A0wen

On Moderation
Joined
19 Jan 2008
Messages
7,469
Good. The Treasury shouldn't spend any more than it needs to on a railway that has an excessive cost base and that has taken a huge amount of subsidy in recent years. It's managed the impressive trick pre-pandemic of increasing customers and revenue whilst also requiring more subsidy. That is a sure sign of something being badly wrong.

I happen to agree with you, but you're brave making such a statement in this parish.

It is a very valid, but oft ignored fact that despite record passenger numbers, subsidy levels were increasing, which is counter intuitive.
 

bramling

Veteran Member
Joined
5 Mar 2012
Messages
17,754
Location
Hertfordshire / Teesdale
I happen to agree with you, but you're brave making such a statement in this parish.

It is a very valid, but oft ignored fact that despite record passenger numbers, subsidy levels were increasing, which is counter intuitive.

That's all well and good, but we all know that masses of subsidy goes on keeping basket-cases like Stranraer or Whitby running. Until now the commuter routes have helped pay the bill for such services.

There's also the question of whether it was an optimal model having peak services running around crush-loaded, even if this was efficient.

No easy solutions, but what is the worst of all worlds is we cut capacity now and then find we need it back a couple of years down the line. London Underground got badly bitten by this in the 80s/90s.
 

Cowley

Forum Staff
Staff Member
Global Moderator
Joined
15 Apr 2016
Messages
15,771
Location
Devon
We’ve gone quite a few miles off topic here…. :)
If anyone wants to start a thread on one of the various subjects that are being discussed then please do!
 

A0wen

On Moderation
Joined
19 Jan 2008
Messages
7,469
That's all well and good, but we all know that masses of subsidy goes on keeping basket-cases like Stranraer or Whitby running. Until now the commuter routes have helped pay the bill for such services.

However, according to Yorksrob services like Whitby and Stranraer are *always* busy to overflowing so the deficits on those lines should be reducing.....

The point made though was pre Covid passenger numbers were increasing *yet* so was the level of subsidy. Logically as passenger numbers increase the gap to be filled by subsidy should be lower.

Keeping it OT, the 379s do seem most likely to head to GN. The only other AC units soon to be available would be the 350/2s, but they won't be free until LNWs Aventras arrive.
 
Last edited:

Peregrine 4903

Established Member
Joined
18 Aug 2019
Messages
1,455
Location
London
However, according to Yorksrob services like Whitby and Stranraer are *always* busy to overflowing so the deficits on those lines should be reducing.....

The point made though was pre Covid passenger numbers were increasing *yet* so was the level of subsidy. Logically as passenger numbers increase the gap to be filled by subsidy should be lower.
This is completely off topic from Class 379's leaving Greater Anglia.

On a different note, are all the class 379's withdrawn now or any still being used in emergency situations?
 

dk1

Veteran Member
Joined
2 Oct 2009
Messages
15,916
Location
East Anglia
This is completely off topic from Class 379's leaving Greater Anglia.

On a different note, are all the class 379's withdrawn now or any still being used in emergency situations?
Two are dumped in the engine sidings at Cambridge with their pans up. A colleague at Liverpool St told me one was hot spare at I think Orient Way yesterday but it is only to be used as a very last resort if at all. Mileage he said was the main issue.
 

Bikeman78

Established Member
Joined
26 Apr 2018
Messages
4,550
This is completely off topic from Class 379's leaving Greater Anglia.

On a different note, are all the class 379's withdrawn now or any still being used in emergency situations?
Last known working was 1H87 and 1H00 on Friday 11th.
 

387star

On Moderation
Joined
16 Nov 2009
Messages
6,655
A huge upgrade for Great Northern
Will they retain the luxurious First Class ?
 

Nicholas Lewis

Established Member
Joined
9 Aug 2019
Messages
6,099
Location
Surrey
One Day yes, the next no... When its all in the hands of the DfT...
Even if it is won't be happening for May as SN are rehashing electrostar diagrams and and services so they can deliver the timetable without the 455's and without any extra stock. However, with 313's rumoured to be next target for the chop in Dec TT change they will need some extra stock then so maybe it with facilitated by 379's going somewhere to release stock. As you say who knows.........
 

yorkie

Forum Staff
Staff Member
Administrator
Joined
6 Jun 2005
Messages
67,764
Location
Yorkshire
Just a gentle reminder that this thread is to discuss Class 379’s departure from Greater Anglia

If anyone wishes to discuss anything else, please create a new thread (if there isn't one already)

Any posts of a speculative/predictive nature are to be posted in Speculative Discussion, please.

Some posts have been moved to:
 
Last edited:

Cowley

Forum Staff
Staff Member
Global Moderator
Joined
15 Apr 2016
Messages
15,771
Location
Devon
Further to the post from @yorkie, there’s a thread here that would be better for speculative discussions:

 
Last edited:
Status
Not open for further replies.

Top