• We're pleased to advise that our booking engine at tickets.railforums.co.uk, which helps support the running of the forum with every ticket purchase, has had some recent improvements, including PlusBus support. Find out more and ask any questions/give us feedback in this thread!

Class 395 to Sheerness-on-Sea

Status
Not open for further replies.

traingeek97

Member
Joined
7 Jun 2020
Messages
85
Location
Kent
Does anyone know if the Class 395 has ever run to Sheerness-on-Sea? Are they able to run on the line?

I'm surprised (pre-Covid) there wasn't a direct service during the morning and evening peak.
 
Sponsor Post - registered members do not see these adverts; click here to register, or click here to log in
R

RailUK Forums

Mikey C

Established Member
Joined
11 Feb 2013
Messages
6,666
Would enough people on Sheppey pay the supplement? It's not a rich area
 

30907

Veteran Member
Joined
30 Sep 2012
Messages
17,077
Location
Airedale
I'm surprised (pre-Covid) there wasn't a direct service during the morning and evening peak.
Running a service via HS1 would mean depriving the Kent Coast or Maidstone of a service, as there are no spare units AFAIK.

Direct peak-hour London services from/to Sheerness were reintroduced a few years ago, but as stoppers via Bromley South (they also ran from electrification in 1959 to (IIRC) the mid 70s). That gives some idea of the relative level of demand - it's a service that can be run without extra rolling stock.
 

Aictos

Established Member
Joined
28 Apr 2009
Messages
10,403
Surely if they were going to run a Class 395 to Sheerness then it be a one way service out of there as the quickest way to escape the place.

It makes Luton look middle class in comparison :lol:

In all seriousness though, with connections at Faversham do we really need to send a Class 395 to Sheerness?
 

Ianno87

Veteran Member
Joined
3 May 2015
Messages
15,216
Running a service via HS1 would mean depriving the Kent Coast or Maidstone of a service, as there are no spare units AFAIK.

Direct peak-hour London services from/to Sheerness were reintroduced a few years ago, but as stoppers via Bromley South (they also ran from electrification in 1959 to (IIRC) the mid 70s). That gives some idea of the relative level of demand - it's a service that can be run without extra rolling stock.

The direct Vic services also give a relatively easy same-platform change at any of the Medway town station.

I rode one of the direct Vic services in the evening peak back in about 2017. Can only have been a handful of passengers on after Rainham, so not an awful lot of demand.
 

73128

Member
Joined
8 Dec 2019
Messages
388
Location
Reading
Surely if they were going to run a Class 395 to Sheerness then it be a one way service out of there as the quickest way to escape the place.

It makes Luton look middle class in comparison :lol:

In all seriousness though, with connections at Faversham do we really need to send a Class 395 to Sheerness?
Can't disagree but from the London end I'd change at Sittingbourne rather than go beyond to Faversham.
 

PaulJ

Member
Joined
20 Jun 2011
Messages
109
Never mind 395s - a few of these should suit Sheppey passengers.
 

Aictos

Established Member
Joined
28 Apr 2009
Messages
10,403
Can't disagree but from the London end I'd change at Sittingbourne rather than go beyond to Faversham.
Apologies, I knew it was one or the other that you could get connections at but it's been so long I've been there that I've forgotten.

Thank you for reminding me of the correct station for the connections.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Top