• Our booking engine at tickets.railforums.co.uk (powered by TrainSplit) helps support the running of the forum with every ticket purchase! Find out more and ask any questions/give us feedback in this thread!

Class 442s - Now at the end of the road and to be withdrawn permanently

Status
Not open for further replies.
Sponsor Post - registered members do not see these adverts; click here to register, or click here to log in
R

RailUK Forums

ScotGG

Established Member
Joined
3 Apr 2013
Messages
1,375
The previous topic was about where else the 442s could move to, and the answer is not many places at all. This is more about how possible it is to keep them a couple more years on existing runs to Brighton & Eastbourne, and move some 377s/387s to Southeastern as a stop gap to help with overcrowding until relief comes in 2018.
 

Bald Rick

Veteran Member
Joined
28 Sep 2010
Messages
29,190
Possible use on SET of the 442's would be the T.Wells terminators. This would release 465/9's to Metro work. Mind you how long would the traction course be- aren't they two handed controls like the 319's

Oh, and they don't fit round any curves west of London Bridge.
 

richa2002

Established Member
Joined
8 Jun 2005
Messages
2,275
The purpose of this thread was to assert when the withdrawals will begin and what will be replacing them.
 

physics34

Established Member
Joined
1 Dec 2013
Messages
3,697
With the revised interior? No, thank you. You can keep them. ;)

With so much overcrowding on South Eastern, the mind boggles that we would rather scrap perfectly serviceable trains than allow SET to have the 387/2s for a few years.

Ha ha.. i really dont think they will scrap them but there must be a use for them somewhere!!!
 

RobShipway

Established Member
Joined
20 Sep 2009
Messages
3,337
Ha ha.. i really dont think they will scrap them but there must be a use for them somewhere!!!

I thought 387/2 where replacing the class 442's, when they have started to come on line so to speak on the Gatwick services?

The only use I can see the class 442's having is as pulled coaches working in push/pull mode with a Class 73/9 replacing the Southern Class 171's, so that the class 171's can be moved to over routes to replace class 156/158's and then those replace some class 150's and class 150's replace some pacers on routes.
 

hwl

Established Member
Joined
5 Feb 2012
Messages
7,396
I thought 387/2 where replacing the class 442's, when they have started to come on line so to speak on the Gatwick services?

The only use I can see the class 442's having is as pulled coaches working in push/pull mode with a Class 73/9 replacing the Southern Class 171's, so that the class 171's can be moved to over routes to replace class 156/158's and then those replace some class 150's and class 150's replace some pacers on routes.

The dwell time and acceleration wouldn't be good for service performance on services with that many stops. Also see Baldrick's comments above about general reliability.
 

theageofthetra

On Moderation
Joined
27 May 2012
Messages
3,504
Won't the west of London Bridge issue be resolved when the new bridge opens? Or is the problem further along?
 

SpacePhoenix

Established Member
Joined
18 Mar 2014
Messages
5,492
The only place they'll be going after withdrawal will be the scrapyard. What classes diesel loco can haul them? Any preserved line that has them classes could perhaps take a unit but would it be viable for a preserved railway (cost and ease of maintenance)?
 

talldave

Established Member
Joined
24 Jan 2013
Messages
2,181
The only place they'll be going after withdrawal will be the scrapyard. What classes diesel loco can haul them? Any preserved line that has them classes could perhaps take a unit but would it be viable for a preserved railway (cost and ease of maintenance)?

I would pay good money to go see them popped in the crusher :)
 

swt_passenger

Veteran Member
Joined
7 Apr 2010
Messages
31,414
The purpose of this thread was to assert when the withdrawals will begin and what will be replacing them.

Problem is that replacement of GatEx 442s by 387/2s immediately follows 387/1 delivery, (and so by the end of this year/early next), is already a known fact, covered in a number of previous threads - initially following GTRs announcement as franchise winner, and subsequently when the 387/2s were eventually confirmed.

It could equally well be suggested that this is yet another 387/2 thread...
 

richa2002

Established Member
Joined
8 Jun 2005
Messages
2,275
Problem is that replacement of GatEx 442s by 387/2s immediately follows 387/1 delivery, (and so by the end of this year/early next), is already a known fact, covered in a number of previous threads - initially following GTRs announcement as franchise winner, and subsequently when the 387/2s were eventually confirmed.

It could equally well be suggested that this is yet another 387/2 thread...
Apologies. Not all of us constantly keep up to date with every part of the modern railway, especially as plans seem to change frequently. Seeing as threads on here can often go into tens of pages, it's difficult to sort the actual information from the mountain of opinions.
 
Last edited:

talldave

Established Member
Joined
24 Jan 2013
Messages
2,181
Philistine. All they need is to be retractioned.

I'm biased - I spent almost 3 hours trapped on one in a freezing cold tunnel. It's not a very pleasant experience at all and seeing them consigned to transporting baked beans would be suitable revenge.

The incident did lead to one of the most surreal ticket checks ever - carried out under the dim glow of the emergency lighting.
 

Chris Wallis

Member
Joined
17 May 2014
Messages
54
Location
Soham, Cambs
Couldn't they have the couplings replaced - assuming that is required - and sent up to Northern to be dragged by Pacers?

Ahem....now where did I put that coat....
 

cjmillsnun

Established Member
Joined
13 Feb 2011
Messages
3,254
I'm biased - I spent almost 3 hours trapped on one in a freezing cold tunnel. It's not a very pleasant experience at all and seeing them consigned to transporting baked beans would be suitable revenge.

The incident did lead to one of the most surreal ticket checks ever - carried out under the dim glow of the emergency lighting.

Which says that the juice rail was discharged. They won't go very far without electricity. A 377 would've been just as unpleasant.
 
Last edited:

CosherB

Established Member
Joined
23 Feb 2007
Messages
3,041
Location
Northwich
Another solution to a problem that doesn't exist? 48 new driving trailers available for conversion for LHCS? Mind you, with 16(?) Mk3B DVTs in storage, I can't envisage much demand for them ..... Booths it is then.
 

sarahj

Established Member
Joined
12 Dec 2012
Messages
1,897
Location
Brighton
I'm biased - I spent almost 3 hours trapped on one in a freezing cold tunnel. It's not a very pleasant experience at all and seeing them consigned to transporting baked beans would be suitable revenge.

The incident did lead to one of the most surreal ticket checks ever - carried out under the dim glow of the emergency lighting.

The only reason I can imagine someone doing a check is to find out who is going where. though there are one or two at the depot....
 

richa2002

Established Member
Joined
8 Jun 2005
Messages
2,275
Another solution to a problem that doesn't exist? 48 new driving trailers available for conversion for LHCS? Mind you, with 16(?) Mk3B DVTs in storage, I can't envisage much demand for them ..... Booths it is then.
The big difference between a DVT and 442 driving trailer is that a DVT is seen as a waste of space as it has no seating but a 442...
 

route:oxford

Established Member
Joined
1 Nov 2008
Messages
4,949
The only use I can see the class 442's having is as pulled coaches working in push/pull mode with a Class 73/9 replacing the Southern Class 171's, so that the class 171's can be moved to over routes to replace class 156/158's and then those replace some class 150's and class 150's replace some pacers on routes.

Hmm... How many Class 73s will there be in Scotland?

I'm thinking 442+73 on the Fife Circle.
 

JB_B

Established Member
Joined
27 Dec 2013
Messages
1,414
I have happy memories of commuting on 442s back in the early '90s ( in the snug!).

They certainly were problematic when returned from storage to work the Brightons (seemed terrible at the start and have never been quite right). The odd thing is that most of the problems i've encountered seem to be above deck ( doors / interlock / PA etc) – those bits are old but not the truly ancient parts – why do they cause more trouble?

(Certainly agree that, these days, going down to Weymouth a 444 would be prefereable)
 

notadriver

Established Member
Joined
1 Oct 2010
Messages
3,653
Juice up the North Downs line and use the 442s on there, nice 5 car sets that would be just right for the North Downs line with their 1600 hp under the MBLS or MLC, which would demolish the steep grades between Guildford & Redhill with aplomb.

They could also provide a through service to London as well, one 5 coming in from Wokingham & another coming in from Reigate to combine at Guildford as 10 car to London.

The 166s presently in use on the line are quicker than a 442 would be on third rail. I remember when the 159s came to SWT how it was they not the 442s that were quickest to accelerate :)
 

HarleyDavidson

Established Member
Joined
23 Aug 2014
Messages
2,529
The 166s presently in use on the line are quicker than a 442 would be on third rail. I remember when the 159s came to SWT how it was they not the 442s that were quickest to accelerate :)

No, but on the North Downs, their 5 car formations would be very useful in the peaks, their low down grunt would as I've said would get them up the gradients on that line with ease, the line speeds over the North Downs is only IIRC a maxima of 70 between Reading & Redhill, with 90 being available for the short section down to Gatwick.

Also, this would provide the North Downs with its own dedicated fleet & their use would release the 166s for use in the West country, especially around Bristol & Exeter.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Top