Where are you going to send the surplus Electrostars?Standard product for all 3rd rail South London metro would make demand shifts easier to deal with too….
Where are you going to send the surplus Electrostars?Standard product for all 3rd rail South London metro would make demand shifts easier to deal with too….
Do they do metro?Where are you going to send the surplus Electrostars?
Yes, Southern 377s work all of the Metro routes which have 10-car trains - ie all of Victoria to Epsom, Dorking & Horsham, Victoria to Sutton via Norbury, Victoria to West Croydon via Crystal Palace, Victoria to London Bridge via Crystal Palace, London Bridge to Epsom, London Bridge to Caterham / Tattenham Corner. (Not all of these service groups are running at present and 8-car formations do a limited number of workings.) Some of these would be ripe for 376s though if external cameras can be fitted for DOO.Do they do metro?
Can they then replace the Networkers?Yes, Southern 377s work all of the Metro routes which have 10-car trains - ie all of Victoria to Epsom, Dorking & Horsham, Victoria to Sutton via Norbury, Victoria to West Croydon via Crystal Palace, Victoria to London Bridge via Crystal Palace, London Bridge to Epsom, London Bridge to Caterham / Tattenham Corner. (Not all of these service groups are running at present and 8-car formations do a limited number of workings.) Some of these would be ripe for 376s though if external cameras can be fitted for DOO.
Why are they building additional sidings at Chart Leacon then?Indeed there's just no space for them and no plans for new sidings. Can't see them being used elsewhere in any great numbers so scrappage it is
What should have happened was the 701's were redirected to SE to eliminate Networkers. SWT had a perfectly adequate fleet plan including 455's with there new traction kit.I think @Journeyman summed it up quite nicely - a fleet to replace the 455s plus allow cascade of Electrostars which are currently covering suburban services.
Aventra's would look to be a good fit - the successor to the Electrostar, 20m carriage lengths, either as 4 or 8 car units.
Have the subject units been de-branded in line with stock that's gone off lease before?Realtime Trains - 584I 1059 Gillingham E.M.U.D. to Worksop Up Receptions
Realtime Trains provides live realtime running information for the Great British railway network using open data.www.realtimetrains.co.uk
The move to Worksop for Thursday is in.
That was never going to happen while the SE franchise future was (and maybe still is) up in the air. The 701s were ordered by SWR not long after that franchise began, so a long term commitment was possible; the Govia-run SE franchise though was just receiving extension after extension, often on the order of just 6 months at a time.What should have happened was the 701's were redirected to SE to eliminate Networkers. SWT had a perfectly adequate fleet plan including 455's with there new traction kit.
What should have happened was the 701's were redirected to SE to eliminate Networkers. SWT had a perfectly adequate fleet plan including 455's with there new traction kit.
SWT didn't seem them as lash ups. Granted 455 won't provide same passenger environment as 701 whenever they get them into use but they had spent the money on all these projects so they should have stuck with them for next 10 years then renewed all the fleet. Instead they now have multi traction fleet and SE is now dumped with another stock type to maintain. All this builds in high base costs to running services in these areas which won't go unnoticed by treasury but because all this new stuff is on contracts they will get rid of the stuff that can be off leased for least financial cost.3 bodged solutions to providing a 10 car railway (455+456 lashups, the 458/5s, and 707s - including the 455 retraction), none of which were particularly well suited to long term futures at the franchise, strikes me as 'adequate'. Just because the 455s had been retractioned didn't mean they were acceptable for another 10 years (or more) service
Besides, as I understand it SE metro is a mixed 8/10 car railway, so quite how it would have worked with the 10 (/2x5) car 701s I don't know
They’ve only got to Gillingham Depot under their own power tonight so I doubt it just yetHave the subject units been de-branded in line with stock that's gone off lease before?
Why are they building additional sidings at Chart Leacon then?
It was a comment about what makes sense given prior investment, not what is happening which is a bit of a bodge job as the 707s were going off lease.The 707s have just been moved to South Eastern - why move them to Southern and lose a coach? Makes no sense at all.
I think a new build Aventra is more likely for Southern allowing 455s and 313s to be replaced.
376s receive proper maintenance at Ramsgate depot, even though they are stabled more commonly in metro area sidings, so if metro units were going to Ashford I wouldn't say it's completely unusual.It's not much use for Networkers or Metro fleet being all the way out in Ashford, and isn't it just a like-for-like depot for Southeastern as Thameslink have taken some of their sidings with no net increase.
So in effect it does absolutely nothing about sidings pressure for suburban routes.
It's almost entirely a 12-car ready railway now but lacks the stock to form 12 car services, which makes 10-car trains a little odd after all the investment.Besides, as I understand it SE metro is a mixed 8/10 car railway, so quite how it would have worked with the 10 (/2x5) car 701s I don't know
True but heavy maintenance isn't as regular as using it as daily sidings.376s receive proper maintenance at Ramsgate depot, even though they are stabled more commonly in metro area sidings, so if metro units were going to Ashford I wouldn't say it's completely unusual.
SWT was a completely different franchise to what exists now under SWR. First-MTR won the franchise by bidding for this new set of requirements that was set out.SWT didn't seem them as lash ups. Granted 455 won't provide same passenger environment as 701 whenever they get them into use but they had spent the money on all these projects so they should have stuck with them for next 10 years then renewed all the fleet…
Get the 376s and 377s from se and replace the 455, 313 and 171s and pretty much SN would be entirely served by electrostars. It would have been more sensible for that to happen imo so southern can have a more standard fleetBecause replacing 40 year old stock with 30 year old stock possibly isn't the best way forward ?
At some point there is going to need to be a plan to replace the 455s and 313s which Southern has, both of which are at or near life expired. Replacing them with 30 year old stock, which wouldn't be standard is probably more costly and is basically kicking the can down the road. Far better to order a common fleet which would wipe out those and possibly even the 171s if there is a way forward with Uckfield and Marshlink.
Realtime Trains - 584I 1059 Gillingham E.M.U.D. to Worksop Up Receptions
Realtime Trains provides live realtime running information for the Great British railway network using open data.www.realtimetrains.co.uk
The move to Worksop for Thursday is in.
Thanks - I don't need to hurriedly book the day off work!likely to be units 466033+465246+465236
Why are they building additional sidings at Chart Leacon then?
Can the marginal platforms at Charing Cross cope with 12 car trains with SDO?
Believe it’s 466024 now instead of 033.likely to be units 466033+465246+465236
That's correct, 466024 was last seen yesterday on 5G01 paired with 465236/246 from Grove Park Up Carriage Holding Sidings to Gillingham (Kent) Electrical Multiple Unit Depot booked to arrive 21:28 last night.Believe it’s 466024 now instead of 033.
Get the 376s and 377s from se and replace the 455, 313 and 171s and pretty much SN would be entirely served by electrostars. It would have been more sensible for that to happen imo so southern can have a more standard fleet
…and as we know from previous discussions the ITT all but told them they needed a new inner suburban fleet, because the various capacity requirements and dwell times couldn’t be met.SWT was a completely different franchise to what exists now under SWR. First-MTR won the franchise by bidding for this new set of requirements that was set out.
Not to mention their express cousins which are off lease for plenty of reasons around resilience, but in terms of the reliability of the units shouldn't be life-expired. At the moment we're seeing a weird reverse order withdrawal where the youngest Networker family units have gone first and the oldest, the Turbos, look set to outlive the rest. The 465/466 happen to be going in the middle by the looks of things.There are issues with the Networkers, but I'm slightly baffled by the idea that they are time expired and ready for the scrapyard when their diesel cousins are in perfect nick and will continue in service for years. The Chiltern 165s even have very effective aircon fitted
Not to mention their express cousins which are off lease for plenty of reasons around resilience, but in terms of the reliability of the units shouldn't be life-expired. At the moment we're seeing a weird reverse order withdrawal where the youngest Networker family units have gone first and the oldest, the Turbos, look set to outlive the rest. The 465/466 happen to be going in the middle by the looks of things.
Thanks for the update class 466. Has this now been confirmed?Believe it’s 466024 now instead of 033.
466024, 465236 & 465246 were the ones moved from Grove Park to Gillingham yesterday, 466033 was out in service this morning and is now at Slade Green DepotThanks for the update class 466. Has this now been confirmed?