• Our booking engine at tickets.railforums.co.uk (powered by TrainSplit) helps support the running of the forum with every ticket purchase! Find out more and ask any questions/give us feedback in this thread!

Class 484 replacing class 483 on the island line: progress updates

Status
Not open for further replies.

cav1975

Member
Joined
24 Sep 2010
Messages
366
Presumably to test the 484s on Island Line before the coming winter's rebuilding/signalling alterations they will need to retain their train stops.
 
Sponsor Post - registered members do not see these adverts; click here to register, or click here to log in
R

RailUK Forums

dgl

Established Member
Joined
5 Oct 2014
Messages
2,411
As I might have said before could they test them overnight out of Weymouth, the lines relatively quiet and Weymouth has sidings to accommodate them. Has history of testing trains before (including the recent 455 AC traction conversions) so testing them there should be a known commodity.
 

Meerkat

Established Member
Joined
14 Jul 2018
Messages
7,521
Melton has a 2.5 mile DC test track but I believe units have to clock up 1,500 or 2,000 miles of testing.
Who says they have to - are there strict rules?
Just seems that if other variants have tested most of the trains systems then it wouldn’t take much testing to be confident the new trains would be more reliable than the current ones!
 

RichT54

Member
Joined
6 Jun 2018
Messages
420
Who says they have to - are there strict rules?
Just seems that if other variants have tested most of the trains systems then it wouldn’t take much testing to be confident the new trains would be more reliable than the current ones!

Do they need testing for safety as well as reliability?
 

Chris125

Established Member
Joined
12 Nov 2009
Messages
3,076
As I might have said before could they test them overnight out of Weymouth, the lines relatively quiet and Weymouth has sidings to accommodate them. Has history of testing trains before (including the recent 455 AC traction conversions) so testing them there should be a known commodity.

Perhaps, but how do they get there? They aren't as straightforward to move around as self-propelled 230s and they aren't as gauge friendly either, as the bodies haven't been raised to clear platforms. It seems a lot of faff for a small outfit like Vivarail.

Who says they have to - are there strict rules?
Just seems that if other variants have tested most of the trains systems then it wouldn’t take much testing to be confident the new trains would be more reliable than the current ones!

I've just checked and an article in the Railway Magazine earlier this year said they'll need to complete 750 miles fault-free running with testing overnight on the Island (back when the first unit was due in late May...)

Hope this link works: https://www.pressreader.com/uk/the-railway-magazine/20200129/281767041365110
 

swt_passenger

Veteran Member
Joined
7 Apr 2010
Messages
31,386
Who says they have to - are there strict rules?
Just seems that if other variants have tested most of the trains systems then it wouldn’t take much testing to be confident the new trains would be more reliable than the current ones!
I reckon posts about fault free running miles usually include an element of “guess the mileage”, it’s quite rare for the same figure to come up twice in a row. I expect in reality the figure is determined for the particular contract, and it’s rarely published...

(I wrote that before post #485 from @Chris125)
 

Meerkat

Established Member
Joined
14 Jul 2018
Messages
7,521
Perhaps, but how do they get there? They aren't as straightforward to move around as self-propelled 230s and they aren't as gauge friendly either, as the bodies haven't been raised to clear platforms. It seems a lot of faff for a small outfit like Vivarail.



I've just checked and an article in the Railway Magazine earlier this year said they'll need to complete 750 miles fault-free running with testing overnight on the Island (back when the first unit was due in late May...)

Hope this link works: https://www.pressreader.com/uk/the-railway-magazine/20200129/281767041365110
So 55 round trips - how many do your reckon you can get through per night...assuming no breakdowns!
 

Chris125

Established Member
Joined
12 Nov 2009
Messages
3,076
So 55 round trips - how many do your reckon you can get through per night...assuming no breakdowns!

If they could get 6 hours overnight they'd surely manage at least 8 return trips, perhaps more?
 

Meerkat

Established Member
Joined
14 Jul 2018
Messages
7,521
If they could get 6 hours overnight they'd surely manage at least 8 return trips, perhaps more?
I used a calculator then typed the wrong number!! It’s 45 trips not 55. So 6 nights with a bit of luck!
 

Helvellyn

Established Member
Joined
28 Aug 2009
Messages
2,012
I've just checked and an article in the Railway Magazine earlier this year said they'll need to complete 750 miles fault-free running with testing overnight on the Island (back when the first unit was due in late May...)

Hope this link works: https://www.pressreader.com/uk/the-railway-magazine/20200129/281767041365110
The new issue of RAIL says the same thing - overnight testing and training. Three units will be delivered in the Autumn to allow this, with the remaining two arriving during the blockade next year. Various works (including the platform height increases) mean the '38 stock will cease running at the start of January.
 

Meerkat

Established Member
Joined
14 Jul 2018
Messages
7,521
The new issue of RAIL says the same thing - overnight testing and training. Three units will be delivered in the Autumn to allow this, with the remaining two arriving during the blockade next year. Various works (including the platform height increases) mean the '38 stock will cease running at the start of January.
Where will they keep the first three, are they clearing out the old trains from the depot early (how many duff ones are in there?)?
 

DavidGrain

Established Member
Joined
29 Dec 2017
Messages
1,236
Are all the platforms still long enough for two units? I remember that the original tube trains were classified 4VEC and 3TIS so 4 car units must have worked the line in the past.
 

Journeyman

Established Member
Joined
16 Apr 2014
Messages
6,295
Are all the platforms still long enough for two units? I remember that the original tube trains were classified 4VEC and 3TIS so 4 car units must have worked the line in the past.

Seven car trains regularly operated when tube stock was first introduced. Apparently the limiting factor is now Lake station, which is long enough for five cars, so yes, paired units will he able to operate.
 

Chris125

Established Member
Joined
12 Nov 2009
Messages
3,076
The new issue of RAIL says the same thing - overnight testing and training. Three units will be delivered in the Autumn to allow this, with the remaining two arriving during the blockade next year. Various works (including the platform height increases) mean the '38 stock will cease running at the start of January.

Well spotted, it's by far the most straightforward option if Vivarail can get them down in time.

Times 5 units

Only three need commissioning before the blockade which should be doable, they are working with Vivarail on how to do the other two before the line reopens.

Seven car trains regularly operated when tube stock was first introduced. Apparently the limiting factor is now Lake station, which is long enough for five cars, so yes, paired units will he able to operate.

Worth noting that a 4-car 484 isn't massively shorter than the 5-car Standard Stock trains the 'modern' stations at Lake and Smallbrook were presumably built for given the longer carriages and modern safety margins, but they should just fit. There isn't much spare room at Shanklin or Pier Head either these days but perhaps TPWS could allow them to stop a little nearer the buffers if need be?
 
Last edited:

hwl

Established Member
Joined
5 Feb 2012
Messages
7,390
Well spotted, it's by far the most straightforward option if Vivarail can get them down in time.



Only three need commissioning before the blockade which should be doable, they are working with Vivarail on how to do the other two before the line reopens.



Worth noting that a 4-car 484 isn't massively shorter than the 5-car Standard Stock trains the 'modern' stations at Lake and Smallbrook were presumably built for given the longer carriages and modern safety margins, but they should just fit. There isn't much spare room at Shanklin or Pier Head either these days but perhaps TPWS could allow them to stop a little nearer the buffers if need be?
Any idea how many axles are actually powered on them post refurb? I'm just wondering as they have 2 driving units and no trailers compared to a mix at LU so they could get away with fewer traction motors on replacement... (you can also get more power out of an AC motor of the same size.)
 

Rick1984

Member
Joined
23 Aug 2012
Messages
1,034
Popped by Smallbrook on Saturday, couldn't get a decent photo but they've lifted the Down (southbound) line under Smallbrook Lane as expected - this, and the Up line under Rink Road tackled last week, should address what were believed to be the tightest clearances on the line.

Smallbrook Lane: IMG_0351 - Copy.JPG

Rink Road: IMG_0344 - Copy.JPG IMG_0346 - Copy.JPG
They just lowered the track?
 

D365

Veteran Member
Joined
29 Jun 2012
Messages
11,450
Any idea how many axles are actually powered on them post refurb? I'm just wondering as they have 2 driving units and no trailers compared to a mix at LU so they could get away with fewer traction motors on replacement... (you can also get more power out of an AC motor of the same size.)

AFAIK all motored axles (D78 spec) remain motored in D-Train form.
 

Midnight Sun

Member
Joined
16 Sep 2018
Messages
310
Seem to remiember that the Class 483 units were tested on the Alton line on Sundays before shipping to the IOW.
 

SouthernR

Member
Joined
25 Aug 2020
Messages
112
Location
Lancaster
At least one pair of 4-VEC & 3-TIS units made test/training runs on the Portsmouth line (seen at Godalming) c.1967.
 

pompeyfan

Established Member
Joined
24 Jan 2012
Messages
4,191
Someone I know who’s a driver and enthusiast has pictures of 483s shuttling around Fratton depot, as well as 485s at various places between Portcreek and Petersfield. One of them has an IC branded 73 on the back, so hopefully that gives a clue to their age.
 

Paul180

Member
Joined
3 Jan 2010
Messages
188
Location
Do you mind I am from Surrey
Someone I know who’s a driver and enthusiast has pictures of 483s shuttling around Fratton depot, as well as 485s at various places between Portcreek and Petersfield. One of them has an IC branded 73 on the back, so hopefully that gives a clue to their age.
They were tested on the Portsmouth direct south of Haslemere, Someone has been posting photos of them on a FB group recently it's probably the same person.
 

Rick1984

Member
Joined
23 Aug 2012
Messages
1,034
Service cancelled due to graffiti on train. It was already down to 1 train service. In this circumstance would it not make more sense to run it vandalised, depending on what's happened to it?
On phone so can't copy from article.

 

cjmillsnun

Established Member
Joined
13 Feb 2011
Messages
3,254
Service cancelled due to graffiti on train. It was already down to 1 train service. In this circumstance would it not make more sense to run it vandalised, depending on what's happened to it?
On phone so can't copy from article.

Depends. If it was over the front screens then the driver’s view will be affected.
 

Lockwood

Member
Joined
4 Apr 2013
Messages
940
Service cancelled due to graffiti on train. It was already down to 1 train service. In this circumstance would it not make more sense to run it vandalised, depending on what's happened to it?
On phone so can't copy from article.


There is no Island Line train service this morning (Monday) .

South Western Railway has said graffiti has caused the service to be stopped.

A spokesperson for the company said:

"We have been informed that due to vandalism there is currently no service on the Island Line.

"The service was reduced to one train due to a train fault, but the remaining train in service was vandalised overnight.

"Until the graffiti can be removed the train will be unable to enter service."

All services between Ryde Pier Head and Shanklin are suspended.

Happy to help :)
 

cav1975

Member
Joined
24 Sep 2010
Messages
366
Service cancelled due to graffiti on train. It was already down to 1 train service. In this circumstance would it not make more sense to run it vandalised, depending on what's happened to it?
On phone so can't copy from article.

Surely running with the graffiti in place would give publicity to the perpetrators and encourage them to do it more often.
 

Lockwood

Member
Joined
4 Apr 2013
Messages
940
And now they know that they can cause disruption to the island's railway with a spray can
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Top