Goldfish62
Veteran Member
- Joined
- 14 Feb 2010
- Messages
- 11,186
As you would expect because that's what we were told the agreement was.The document pictured in post 7097 refers (twice) to Driver Controlled Operation ( DCO) - not DOO.
As you would expect because that's what we were told the agreement was.The document pictured in post 7097 refers (twice) to Driver Controlled Operation ( DCO) - not DOO.
DCO is essentially DOO but with a guard on board. The driver has full control of the doors, the guard being there solely for revenue protection and safety purposes. DCO is quicker than GO, but safer than DOO.Oh I assumed they were both the same thing, what's the difference? Is it this "guard does passenger service duties" agreement that was made a while ago?
If i understand it correctly:Oh I assumed they were both the same thing, what's the difference? Is it this "guard does passenger service duties" agreement that was made a while ago?
The poster to whom I was replying had said incorrectly that it referred to DOO. I was trying to avoid more possible confusion by correcting thatAs you would expect because that's what we were told the agreement was.
I can not say for sure but i think it is very likely that they have. It seems that SWR are eventually replacing all their announcements with the 158s and 159s and 484s already done. Considering that the 701s are a major launch they probably want the new announcements from day one so i would guess that the switch from Celia Drummond to Elinor Hamilton has already happened.Have the onboard announcements on these trains been changed from Celia to Elinor?
The company also seemed keen on the soft launch to test out the current method of working on a temporary basis. If what I suspect will happen is dispatch moves back to guard close for full operation then it will need union agreement, but that wouldn't take long anyway.If full fleet introduction is dependent on further union agreements, there's potentially scope to delay that without it being construed as industrial action.
But this is no more than speculation on my part, so I don't want to push the point any further. We'll find out in due course.
There is also a counter that they are replacing 2 full fleets of trains and not everyone needed to be trained on 707s so it was slightly easier.I don't understand why this should all be a particular issue. It's not as if there's never been any new trains introduced on the South Western before (although some people seem to want to ensure that it never happens again). Surely they just do what they've done in the past, most recently with the 707s.
Why do you think it would move back to the guard? That's not exactly the standard method of operation in London and the SE. Then there's the agreement struck with ASLEF on DCO, including a financial incentive.The company also seemed keen on the soft launch to test out the current method of working on a temporary basis. If what I suspect will happen is dispatch moves back to guard close for full operation then it will need union agreement, but that wouldn't take long anyway.
I just think the risk of being left behind is too high in its current format, yeah the guard has to key on but there's multiple situations which could arise where that key could be knocked off accidently. Yeah its all subjective but it could happen.Why do you think it would move back to the guard? That's not exactly the standard method of operation in London and the SE. Then there's the agreement struck with ASLEF on DCO, including a financial incentive.
I can't see the DfT agreeing to it.
On your first point it works perfectly well on Greater Anglia and Southern so any suggestion that it won't here is surely South Western exceptionalism!I just think the risk of being left behind is too high in its current format, yeah the guard has to key on but there's multiple situations which could arise where that key could be knocked off accidently. Yeah its all subjective but it could happen.
Then you've got all this degraded working, what's stopping drivers every 5 minutes just saying the cameras are crap I'm not working them here you go?
Logically if it says driver open driver close, guards will be gone in the next pay deal
Do they have the same key on and check then key off aswell, if so that is fair enough I didn't know!On your first point it works perfectly well on Greater Anglia and Southern so any suggestion that it won't here is surely South Western exceptionalism!
On your last point I think recent history makes that incredibly unlikely. We've been through all that with over two years of strike action before Covid.
They can go on strike!The RMT can do nothing about that then can they?
Not sure striking on services that won't need them on to run will make a difference, but like you say let's move onThey can go on strike!
Anyway, let's move well away from the DOO debate and back to our favourite unit's eagerly anticipated introduction.
My boldSouthern Metro, Thameslink, GWR 387s, GA 720s, Elizabeth line, Southeastern Metro and LO all run DOO. Why can’t the 701s? Would certainly be much faster than having the guard faff with the doors?
So they are to be DCO after all. Sounds good.My bold
The 701s are due to be operated DCO. In DCO, the guards do not operate the doors? The trains are essentially operated DOO but with a guard onboard for customer interaction, revenue checks (where grade permits) and safety critical duties during disruption.
For SWR it might be "Driver Release - Guard Close"?Oh I assumed they were both the same thing, what's the difference? Is it this "guard does passenger service duties" agreement that was made a while ago?
If they reported all the bad news the magazines would need to be five times thicker for a start...Not helped by an industry related public magazine culture that has over the last decade or so (IMHO) become what some might say is nothing more than a PR mouthpiece for the industry, so any bad news gets buried before it even surfaces (current SWR woes a noticeable example). There was a time when the industry related media would ask probing questions, but no more it would seem. Are we on a very dangerous (lack of truth news) slope in such matters I wonder, think China, Russia and their news agencies! But one is getting a tad OT now, so apologies to all !
Nobody is reporting a date yet.Hi, are the new trains going to be introduced on Friday, Saturday or Sunday?
In passenger service? Is it on RTT?Apparently one return trip tomorrow to Windsor is planned
If the weather there, is anything like the past 3 hours on the Hants-Sussex coast, then I bet they'd rather keep the 701's doors closed!Realtime Trains | 5Q22 1307 London Waterloo to London Waterloo | 04/01/2024
Real-time train running information for 5Q22 1307 departure from London Waterloo to London Waterloo on 04/01/2024. From Realtime Trains, an independent source of train running info for Great Britain.www.realtimetrains.co.uk
A 701 currently on test around the hounslow loop. Train is stopping and opening doors and using what looked like driver open guard close method.
There's four return trips in as 5Qxx during the day; if this happens I would guess they'll convert one of those at short notice? Two of them are square in the middle of the off peak period.In passenger service? Is it on RTT?
How exciting! Can’t wait to see photos and videos if it works out.Apparently one return trip tomorrow to Windsor is planned
Apparently one return trip tomorrow to Windsor is planned
No service trains planned tomorrow.In passenger service? Is it on RTT?