• Our new ticketing site is now live! Using either this or the original site (both powered by TrainSplit) helps support the running of the forum with every ticket purchase! Find out more and ask any questions/give us feedback in this thread!

Class 701 'Aventra' trains for South Western Railway

Sponsor Post - registered members do not see these adverts; click here to register, or click here to log in
R

RailUK Forums

Joined
30 Jul 2015
Messages
933
It looks like a pair of 455s made what these days is an unusual trip to Windsor this morning, deputising for a 701 (same diagram as 2U31)
 

nctd2306

Member
Joined
2 Jan 2024
Messages
125
Location
Berkshire
It looks like a pair of 455s made what these days is an unusual trip to Windsor this morning, deputising for a 701 (same diagram as 2U31)
I wonder how it managed to call at Datchet which can no longer accommodate an 8-455
Presumably it just skipped it?
 

Goldfish62

Veteran Member
Joined
14 Feb 2010
Messages
11,360
The same is being found on SWR as when Thameslink introduced long single units replacing formations consisting of 2 or 3 units. Previously you'd run a short formation if there was a unit failure - the service would still run. Now the service is cancelled. It makes issues more noticeable.
 

Jamesrob637

Established Member
Joined
12 Aug 2016
Messages
5,568
The same is being found on SWR as when Thameslink introduced long single units replacing formations consisting of 2 or 3 units. Previously you'd run a short formation if there was a unit failure - the service would still run. Now the service is cancelled. It makes issues more noticeable.

One of Northern's advantages. Now if only so many services weren't booked 2-car but that's for another thread
Can't 5-car 701s be used, then you still run 5 if one fails?
 

cactustwirly

Established Member
Joined
10 Apr 2013
Messages
7,703
Location
UK
It looks like a pair of 455s made what these days is an unusual trip to Windsor this morning, deputising for a 701 (same diagram as 2U31)
That explains a lot, when I looked at RTT this morning it was only showing 1x 10 car service from Windsor. 701031 must have been a swap at some point
 

swr444

Member
Joined
26 Aug 2008
Messages
636
Location
London
NR does not always means skipped, although it usually does. But in this instance 2U21 arrived at Windsor when it was supposed to have been at Datchet so could not have called there.
It means no report which means it didn’t stop in section for enough time.
 

cactustwirly

Established Member
Joined
10 Apr 2013
Messages
7,703
Location
UK
Had my first ride on one today and those seats are really cramped. A 455 is more comfortable as the seats are wider and have gaps between them.

They are a massive comfort downgrade compared to a 458/5
 

norbitonflyer

Established Member
Joined
24 Mar 2020
Messages
3,446
Location
SW London
And right on cue, 031 has just broken down on 2U31 (never even left Waterloo)
701031 has been in and out of service all day.

2U08 (0551 ex windsor) ran
2U11 (0703 ex Waterloo) cancelled "planning error")
2U18 (0821 ex Windsor) cancelled (late arrivel of incoming)
2U21 (0933 ex Waterloo) filled by 2x455
2U28 (1051 ex Windsor) filled by 2x 455
2U31 (1203 ex waterllo) cacelled (doors)
2U38 (1321 ex windsor) staerted Staines
2U41 and 2U48 running
 

swr444

Member
Joined
26 Aug 2008
Messages
636
Location
London
Can confirm that the Shepperton 701 diagram will be starting from next week. 2H08 05:43 off Teddington is the first working

Also a 701 on the Shepperton line this Saturday, it's on whatever circuit 2H27 is.

Found 2 sets out on this sunday coming as well, on the Kingston Rounder / Shepperton diagram and a Windsor diagram. 2K09 and 2U39 are examples.
 
Last edited:
Joined
2 Jun 2023
Messages
586
Location
Richmond
Can confirm that the Shepperton 701 diagram will be starting from next week. 2H08 05:43 off Teddington is the first working

Also a 701 on the Shepperton line this Saturday, it's on whatever circuit 2H27 is.

Found 2 sets out on this sunday coming as well, on the Kingston Rounder / Shepperton diagram and a Windsor diagram. 2K09 and 2U39 are examples.
3 new diagrams then, albeit not on the same day
 

norbitonflyer

Established Member
Joined
24 Mar 2020
Messages
3,446
Location
SW London
Can confirm that the Shepperton 701 diagram will be starting from next week. 2H08 05:43 off Teddington is the first working

Also a 701 on the Shepperton line this Saturday, it's on whatever circuit 2H27 is.
That seems to start with 2H12 0641 Wat-Shepperton, 2H11 0742 Shepperton - Waterloo, and repeat every 2 hours

Found 2 sets out on this sunday coming as well, on the Kingston Rounder / Shepperton diagram and a Windsor diagram. 2K09 and 2U39 are examples.
2K09 is 0718 Waterloo-Wimbledon- Richmond- Waterloo, then
2O17 0917 Waterloo-Ric-Wim- Waterloo
2H23 1048 Wat-Shepp
2H34 1211 Shepp-Wat
2K33 1318 Wat - Wim - Ric - Wat
(repeats after six hours, reporting numbers incrementing by 24)

and
2U19 0844 Waterloo-Windsor all stations
2u26 1001 Windsor -Waterloo all stations
1U29 1125 waterloo- Windsor (semi fast)
1u36 1234 Windsor-Waterloo (semi fast)
2u39 1344 Waterloo- Windsor all statoins
(repeats after five hours, reporting numbers increment by 20)

If these come to pass, they will be the first calls by a 701 at Queenstown, Wandsworth Town, Barnes, Mortlake, North Sheen, St Margarets and Strawberry Hill
 
Last edited:

markle

Member
Joined
13 Apr 2023
Messages
68
Location
London
If these come to pass, they will be the first calls by a 701 at Queenstown, Wandsworth Town, Barnes, Mortlake, North Sheen, St Margarets and Strawberry Hill

There are already some Shepperton via Richmond services running 701s that call at Strawberry Hill - e.g. 2H93
 

Elorith

Member
Joined
30 Mar 2022
Messages
140
Location
West Midlands
A poor & short sighted decision by those in charge, particularly as the time, money & effort invested in obtaining the agreements, hardware, training & additional staff flexibility all appear to have been wasted.
Presumably there is still the option of bringing in full DCO at a later date.

The same is being found on SWR as when Thameslink introduced long single units replacing formations consisting of 2 or 3 units. Previously you'd run a short formation if there was a unit failure - the service would still run. Now the service is cancelled. It makes issues more noticeable.
The other advantage of having a formation of 2 or 3 units coupled together is that you can bring what is effectively 2 or 3 possible trains on/off depots all at once.

You only require one driver to move the set.
 

DMckduck97

Member
Joined
26 Jul 2020
Messages
354
Location
England
Presumably there is still the option of bringing in full DCO at a later date.


The other advantage of having a formation of 2 or 3 units coupled together is that you can bring what is effectively 2 or 3 possible trains on/off depots all at once.

You only require one driver to move the set.
It is sort of admitting defeat, will be much harder to implement in the future. There's no time like the present in my opinion .

We all know what the railway is like at this point.
 

norbitonflyer

Established Member
Joined
24 Mar 2020
Messages
3,446
Location
SW London
Not a good morning,
Surbiton peakbuster (2J92) cancelled due to crew issues (although it seems the empty stock ran, as 701043)
First round trip to Windsor 2U07/14 cancelled because of a "unit swap" (what?) but diagram taken up from 2U17 by 701036
 

Towers

Established Member
Joined
30 Aug 2021
Messages
2,370
Location
UK
Presumably there is still the option of bringing in full DCO at a later date.
That would be time consuming, disruptive and of little obvious benefit. The ‘paperwork’ to approve stations for DCO would likely all need doing again, drivers would need releasing for more training, etc. Very unlikely to be worth the hassle if the trains are running fine with guards who will remain on board anyway.
 

Carlisle

Established Member
Joined
26 Aug 2012
Messages
4,282
The ‘paperwork’ to approve stations for DCO would likely all need doing again,
If recent posts are accurate hardly any stations got fully cleared for DCO anyway meaning there weren’t sufficient stops for trainees to get easily passed out, hence it was dropped.
 
Last edited:

Top