dk1
Veteran Member
You can train on a class 755 and then sign both them and class 745 but not the other way round.Who has been training on them at Orient Way CS if Class 755s are unlikely to go there?
You can train on a class 755 and then sign both them and class 745 but not the other way round.Who has been training on them at Orient Way CS if Class 755s are unlikely to go there?
Hopefully some of those ECS moves will diminish once multiple operation is finished & if fuelling becomes more commonplace elsewhere during the day. For example one day last week thanks to the non-coupling issue I was 'spare' from home all afternoon but had to go pass to Ipswich on the 23:05 just to bring a 755 back to Crown Point. Crazy!!3TPH is indeed possible, but will take just one train about 10 late, maybe less, the throw it out, and then there are the constant ECS moves to / from Norwich and the Point, will also need Norwich Station to up their game too
As has been described elsewhere on these pages at length, the 20 were bought as that is what is needed to operate the service proposed in the franchise bid. 9 in circuit on the Stansteds, with one spare, and 9 in circuit on the Norwich service with one spare. This assumed reduced journey times for both, particularly for the latter. The ‘third’ Norwich service an hour was always going to be a 720.
West Anglia drivers.I disagree. Where all trains are a similar speed / acceleration 3tph is possible. Where the problem comes is with the North Walsham Tanks taking up the half hour between one Intercity and the next because of its slow speed.
Who has been training on them at Orient Way CS if Class 755s are unlikely to go there?
Been having a play lately. 100mph is easily attainable on a 755 (in AC mode) before shutting off for Stowmarket neutral section whereas 95 is the most I've got out of a 745. I will keep trying.Has anyone hit a full 100mph yet from the 50mph TSR before braking for Stowmarket stop? I think 95mph is the fastest i have seen on a 755/3. Even then it seemed a quite easy station stop.
Are you guys finding the 745/1s slightly faster accelerating. I am assuming lighter due to no tables? I measured 0 to 100mph in 100 secs!!! SENSATIONAL!!!Been having a play lately. 100mph is easily attainable on a 755 (in AC mode) before shutting off for Stowmarket neutral section whereas 95 is the most I've got out of a 745. I will keep trying.
Not noticed anything.Are you guys finding the 745/1s slightly faster accelerating. I am assuming lighter due to no tables? I measured 0 to 100mph in 100 secs!!! SENSATIONAL!!!
Surely that's got to be a coincidence. 500 odd seatback tables could only weigh as much as maybe 10 passengers, I can't believe you'd see a noticeable difference from that.Are you guys finding the 745/1s slightly faster accelerating. I am assuming lighter due to no tables? I measured 0 to 100mph in 100 secs!!! SENSATIONAL!!!
The 745/1s still have seatback tables. It is the main tables and supports that have gone.Surely that's got to be a coincidence. 500 odd seatback tables could only weigh as much as maybe 10 passengers, I can't believe you'd see a noticeable difference from that.
Of course they have, sorry - in which case it'll likely be even less weight. I'd be surprised if there was any substantial difference between the performance of each unit, must just have been an enthusiastic driver and the right conditions.The 745/1s still have seatback tables. It is the main tables and supports that have gone.
I can only think it was due to a number of factors - very light load...plenty of juice in the 25kV supply, a healthy performing unit..and a driver giving it the full beans!
Silly question perhaps, but do you have a line voltage meter in your cab?The 745/1s still have seatback tables. It is the main tables and supports that have gone.
I can only think it was due to a number of factors - very light load...plenty of juice in the 25kV supply, a healthy performing unit..and a driver giving it the full beans!
I believe so. Certainly the Hitachi 80x stuff does.Silly question perhaps, but do you have a line voltage meter in your cab?
It's not uncommon elsewhere, especially in lowish voltage DC countries. I've seen 3.6kV DC (rather than 3.0kV) in a stationary Belgium EMU cab in Luxembourg & 1.1kV (rather than 1.5kV DC) wasn't unusual in the Netherlands either.
Other trains running on the line in the same or opposite direction can have an effect on that too.Silly question perhaps, but do you have a line voltage meter in your cab?
It's not uncommon elsewhere, especially in lowish voltage DC countries. I've seen 3.6kV DC (rather than 3.0kV) in a stationary Belgium EMU cab in Luxembourg & 1.1kV (rather than 1.5kV DC) wasn't unusual in the Netherlands either.
Silly question perhaps, but do you have a line voltage meter in your cab?
It's not uncommon elsewhere, especially in lowish voltage DC countries. I've seen 3.6kV DC (rather than 3.0kV) in a stationary Belgium EMU cab in Luxembourg & 1.1kV (rather than 1.5kV DC) wasn't unusual in the Netherlands either.
The opposite can also happen when a train brakes not far, as it sends back power to the knitting, the current can go in excess, and it can even prevent the older train from leaving a station until the current comes down again.It usually averages around the 23/24 mark on a normal day, 22 when there are lot of trains around.
Thanks. ISTR that the original BR specifications for 25 kV locos & units were for X tons @ x speeds at a line voltage of 22.5kV, they must have realized that it's not possible to provide an exact 25kV feed everywhere.Pretty much the norm these days, all the new Bombardier Aventras do the same (albeit not a meter but a visual indication to the nearest whole Kv eg 23,22,21) on the TCMS screen that acts a line voltage indication. The days of physical line lights seem to gone. It usually averages around the 23/24 mark on a normal day, 22 when there are lot of trains around.
The opposite can also happen when a train brakes not far, as it sends back power to the knitting, the current can go in excess, and it can even prevent the older train from leaving a station until the current comes down again.
Other trains running on the line in the same or opposite direction can have an effect on that too.
I have a recollection (just tried to find a reference but failed, so treat with a pinch of salt) that they initially had to timetable trains so as to match the uphill trains to the downhill ones, but later they put automatically switched banks of resistances in the feed stations to dump excess power.That was a real problem in Belgium when they electrified their main line through the Ardennes to Arlon & onward into Luxembourg.
If there were too many trains regenerating downhill, when the over-voltage exceeded 3.6 kV DC, the regen brake would shut down which triggered a heavy air-brake application..... AFAIK, some of the sub-stations were equipped with resistor banks to absorb the unwanted energy.
Q?, did the Woodhead route have similar problems?
So I see that even on a Sunday there are three 745/0 diagrams which are being operated without first class (I assume 745/1s?)
Is this to give the 745/1s a run out or is there a shortage, even on a Sunday, of 745/0s.
Update: 97mph achieved on 106.Been having a play lately. 100mph is easily attainable on a 755 (in AC mode) before shutting off for Stowmarket neutral section whereas 95 is the most I've got out of a 745. I will keep trying.
That is damn good going & has set me a challenge.Update: 97mph achieved on 106.
The 745/1's definitely seem to have more oomph in them for some reason - or maybe my first runs on the 745/0's weren't being driven at full power. I have recorded 0-60mph in 37 seconds Northbound out of Stowmarket and 100mph in under two minutes despite the climb to Haughley - which is pretty phenomenal! Of course - passenger loading are still almost negligible.That is damn good going & has set me a challenge.