• Our booking engine at tickets.railforums.co.uk (powered by TrainSplit) helps support the running of the forum with every ticket purchase! Find out more and ask any questions/give us feedback in this thread!

GWR Class 800

Status
Not open for further replies.
Sponsor Post - registered members do not see these adverts; click here to register, or click here to log in
R

RailUK Forums

The Ham

Established Member
Joined
6 Jul 2012
Messages
10,324
Is that why the season ticket holders were actively looking for an HST at Paddington, then?

For the same reason that people get on the same train and sit in the same seat and get upset when they find someone had got there first.

People don't generally like change, the older that they are the less inclined they are to accept change.
 

Mollman

Established Member
Joined
21 Sep 2016
Messages
1,231
Regarding comments about them being too short - even if it is a 2x5 working people may feel there are not enough carriages because you cannot move between the two halves of the train easily. As with double Voyagers or 185s it is common to find one set a lot busier than the other.
 

The Ham

Established Member
Joined
6 Jul 2012
Messages
10,324
Regarding comments about them being too short - even if it is a 2x5 working people may feel there are not enough carriages because you cannot move between the two halves of the train easily. As with double Voyagers or 185s it is common to find one set a lot busier than the other.

Given that one 5 coach set can hold 60% of the passengers of a HST there's some tolerance between the two for one being busier than the other. The regulars are likely to learn which at gets busier and will seat themselves accordingly.
 

D1009

Established Member
Joined
22 Feb 2012
Messages
3,166
Location
Stoke Gifford
Given that one 5 coach set can hold 60% of the passengers of a HST there's some tolerance between the two for one being busier than the other. The regulars are likely to learn which at gets busier and will seat themselves accordingly.
No, we're talking Reading commuters here, who pile in the rear door
 

Mintona

Established Member
Joined
8 Jan 2006
Messages
3,592
Location
South West
Have any more 9 car sets entered service yet? I thought I saw 800313 in service yesterday.

It was definitely in service yesterday, looking incredibly shiny. I saw it leaving Bristol Parkway about 2100 heading to London.
 

The Ham

Established Member
Joined
6 Jul 2012
Messages
10,324
No, we're talking Reading commuters here, who pile in the rear door

Yes, so all the regulars going further will all aim to get in the front unit and have lots of space. The Reading commuters are all crammed together whilst leaving most of the rest of the passengers a much more pleasant journey.

You just have to feel sorry for those with advanced tickets with a booked seat in the rear unit, but there's probably not many of them in the peaks.
 

Master29

Established Member
Joined
19 Feb 2015
Messages
1,970
It seems the 802 may finally be entering service on Monday but does anyone have any idea of diagrams?
 

BowesRanger

Member
Joined
16 Jul 2018
Messages
100
Saw an unbranded 800 trundle through Bowes Park the other day, apparently heading up the Hertford loop, not just turning around in the reversing siding.

Any idea why they're using that line? Possibly for diversion routes?
 

Rail Blues

Member
Joined
2 Aug 2016
Messages
608
he poster you are referring to has been busy telling the world about his dislike of the 800s and the IEP programme generally on another forum, with occasional appearances here, for a number of years now. The basic script hasn't really changed since they were still at the design stage and probably never will.

As an aside (and I am not referring to this above poster specifically) but it never fails to amaze me the number of people on this board, when it is suggested that their particular bugbear is a bit crank-like or confined to a subsection of enthusiasts and isn't shared by the travelling public at large, will cite overhearing or having a conversation with a regular passenger ( often an American or German tourist for reasons I can't fathom) who happened to mention unprompted their particular pet peeve, such as the slope on the corridor connection between the class 800 as 'proof' of the validity of whatever non issue they've been chaffing over.

Funnily enough, as someone actively interested in the railways, I've never felt the need when visiting another country to buttonhole a fellow passenger and give them a critical and detailed commentary on the rolling stock or opine about the topic so loudly that a stranger sitting a few seats away can hear.

I would say the chances of a 'normal' passenger doing so are up there with sitting in a table seat with Lord Lucan, Elvis and Shergar, almost like the conversation never actually happened at all.
 
Last edited:

43055

Established Member
Joined
8 Mar 2018
Messages
2,902
Hi does anyone know if the 9 car sets have a composite coach?

I say this because when I left Bristol yesterday on the 1300 to Manchester and the 1300 to London looked like it had the driving car and the coach next to it as first class and no composite after (first class was at the rear). It may be a branding issue as the white first class line was not present on the full first class vehicle.
 

Charlie M.

Member
Joined
4 Oct 2015
Messages
170
Location
Gloucester
Hi does anyone know if the 9 car sets have a composite coach?

I say this because when I left Bristol yesterday on the 1300 to Manchester and the 1300 to London looked like it had the driving car and the coach next to it as first class and no composite after (first class was at the rear). It may be a branding issue as the white first class line was not present on the full first class vehicle.

No composite coaches on the 9 car
 

Pete_uk

Established Member
Joined
28 Jan 2017
Messages
1,253
Location
Stroud, Glos
I just realised, I have never noticed the height difference between the powered and eunpowered coaches.
 

tbtc

Veteran Member
Joined
16 Dec 2008
Messages
17,882
Location
Reston City Centre
As an aside (and I am not referring to this above poster specifically) but it never fails to amaze me the number of people on this board, when it is suggested that their particular bugbear is a bit crank-like or confined to a subsection of enthusiasts and isn't shared by the travelling public at large, will cite overhearing or having a conversation on with a regular passenger ( often an American or German tourist for reasons I can't fathom) who happened to mention unprompted their particular pet peeve, such as the slope on the corridor connection between the class 800 as 'proof' of the validity of whatever non issue they've been chaffing over.

Funnily enough, as someone actively interested in the railways, I've never felt the need when visiting another country to buttonhole a fellow passenger and give them a critical and detailed commentary on the rolling stock or opine about the topic so loudly that a stranger sitting a few seats away can hear.

I would say the chances of a 'normal' passenger doing so are up there with sitting in a table seat with Lord Lucan, Elvis and Shergar, almost like the conversation never actually happened at all.

Great point - this has been bothering me for a while too - the incredibly detailed quotes from random members of the public that just see to echo the views of the particular poster in question (not a dig at any one poster, a general point about these kind of baloney quotes). One poster on a local bus forum always seemed to overhear passengers who said particularly knowledgable things about how they preferred the W-reg ALX400s to the X-reg ALX400s or they noticed minor details about side-destination blinds... I must have been unlucky since the passengers who shared my bus rides never seemed bothered about such geeky details - if anything they were more likely to get flustered because they didn't read the number of the bus they'd hailed and ended up going in the wrong direction :lol:

I agree that the lack of corridor connection is disappointing (though thoroughly understandable in sloped 125-mph stock), but we all know that Reading passengers won't move one further coach along to get a seat so I'm not convinced that many passengers are going to walk over a hundred metres to get through to the "other" unit (of a 5+5). There'll be *some* people who'd walk that far along a moving train (though personally I don't don't do much more than about one mile per hour as I wobble my way through the carriages of a train at speed) but we all know that the carriages at the "London" end of a long train will always be busier than those at the "country" end yet people are reluctant to walk far for the sake of a seat. I take the lack of corridor connection as a bigger issue in shorter trains (like the doubled up Pacers we have around these parts), where the desire to walk from one unit to the other is more pressing.

The GWML managed with doubled up 165/166s didn't it?

I just realised, I have never noticed the height difference between the powered and eunpowered coaches.

Remember the days of "the powered coaches will be so steeply sloped (due to the engined underneath) that the trolley will struggle to get through and passengers will be put off the big hill"?

Like a lot of the complaints about 80x a couple of years ago, it's all gone fairly quiet since people actually got to use them.
 

Bletchleyite

Veteran Member
Joined
20 Oct 2014
Messages
97,837
Location
"Marston Vale mafia"
The only thing that is insanely rubbish about them is the seats. With Grammer IC3000s (or even E3000s per the Desiro) they’d be fine.

Though I do think low floor should have been a requirement.
 

cactustwirly

Established Member
Joined
10 Apr 2013
Messages
7,455
Location
UK
The only thing that is insanely rubbish about them is the seats. With Grammer IC3000s (or even E3000s per the Desiro) they’d be fine.

Though I do think low floor should have been a requirement.

No the seats themselves are fine, but they just need a load of extra padding!
 

Rail Blues

Member
Joined
2 Aug 2016
Messages
608
units. Over half the order is 5 car, with a minority of full length ones.
I forecast mainly bus style seating with only a small number of tables. Fewer than half the seats are at tables. I can remember the original HST layout of 16 tables per coach



It has been noted often enough here and elsewhere that the full fleet of five-car 800s is still not available to GWR, which means that Hitachi has to cover 32 daily diagrams with 32 sets, instead of 36, and somehow also carry out programmed maintenance and handle unexpected faults. In that situation. some short-forms are almost inevitable, unless you are expecting Hitachi to achieve faultless performance day after day. If short-forming continues to happen frequently when the full 800 and 802 fleets are available, that would be cause for concern, but we are not at that stage yet.

Shush Jimm don't confuse the poor fellow with actual information or facts, these types don't like reality interfering with their attempts to wallow in a warm bath of bogus nostalgia.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Top