• Our new ticketing site is now live! Using either this or the original site (both powered by TrainSplit) helps support the running of the forum with every ticket purchase! Find out more and ask any questions/give us feedback in this thread!

Collision and derailment near Salisbury (Fisherton Tunnel) 31/10/21

Status
Not open for further replies.

30907

Veteran Member
Joined
30 Sep 2012
Messages
19,532
Location
Airedale
Apart from the relative lack of injuries, the other cause for thankfulness (reading RTT so public info) is that an eastbound GW passed the junction just before the SW.
 
Sponsor Post - registered members do not see these adverts; click here to register, or click here to log in
R

RailUK Forums

Iskra

Established Member
Joined
11 Jun 2014
Messages
8,561
Location
West Riding
If the signals were not lit then the driver should have treated them as being their most restrictive aspect.
Maybe they did, and they just couldn't stop in time- possibly accentuated by the rail and weather conditions.
 

physics34

Established Member
Joined
1 Dec 2013
Messages
3,777
These photos have clearly been photographed off a screen. Whoever is leaking these images and other information from internal sources should be ashamed.
Im not overly fussed with the pics being leaked...(nothing to hide and all that) but im concerned about internal communica and reports being leaked.
 

357

Established Member
Joined
12 Nov 2018
Messages
1,559
Eyewitness told the BBC the following:
I'd say that around 100-150 passengers were taken off 2 trains at the station with vague descriptions of "an incident in the tunnel" that was initially blocking eastbound trains, after about 30 minutes it was advised that all trains will be cancelled and we started seeing people heading down the line with protective gear and head torches on. The platform was blocked off and remaining passengers were asked to congregate outside the front of the station, at times we were asked to move to allow various police and ambulance crews to enter the station

1635714597140.png
 
Last edited:

Wilts Wanderer

Established Member
Joined
21 Nov 2016
Messages
2,755
Is the junction layout a diamond or a pair of single lead turnouts and up-down facing crossover? I wonder if the southbound GWR passing the junction has any bearing on the route the SWR service has taken to come into collision with the preceding GWR.
 

shakey1961

Member
Joined
21 Dec 2014
Messages
155
From the Telegraph Website:

"It is understood that the 1708 Portsmouth Harbour to Bristol Temple Meads train, a Great Western service, hit an object as it came out of a tunnel near Salisbury station and the rear carriage derailed."

 
Last edited by a moderator:

alxndr

Established Member
Joined
3 Apr 2015
Messages
1,547
Maybe they did, and they just couldn't stop in time- possibly accentuated by the rail and weather conditions.
I was only trying to answer the question as to what a driver should do if the signal was not lit correctly. I have no idea what did/didn't take place here and have no wish to speculate, hence the heavy emphasis in my original post on the "if".
 

MadMac

Member
Joined
13 Jun 2008
Messages
1,060
Location
Moorpark, CA
Do we know this to be true?

The reports say the signalling was knocked out. We don't know how that happened. It's quite possible that the signal protecting the tunnel was no longer operating correctly. The cabling could easily have been damaged during the train derailment.

I'm also glad that everyone seems to be (relatively) unscathed.
Entirely possible for the cables to have been damaged by the derailment, but (if, and it’s a BIG ‘if’, that’s what happened) damaged in such a way as to give a proceed aspect to a following train, especially when there’s two ways to approach from? That’s sheer bad luck. I can’t think of another instance of something like that happening. The full circumstances will come out in time.
 

Mitchell Hurd

On Moderation
Joined
28 Oct 2017
Messages
1,674
Forgive me for asking but would the engines have automatically cut out - the last thing you want when 2 diesel trains end up like this in a tunnel is for the tunnel to fill with carbon monoxide.

I'm well relieved that there were no fatalities on both trains!
 

bramling

Veteran Member
Joined
5 Mar 2012
Messages
18,205
Location
Hertfordshire / Teesdale
If power to this area is fed through the tunnel and the cable has been severed that would lead to dark signals so plausible but not sure what drivers responsibilities are in this situation.

No aspect is a danger signal.
If the signals were not lit then the driver should have treated them as being their most restrictive aspect.

Something which unfortunately isn’t that easy to do in practice in darkness.
 

Bletchleyite

Veteran Member
Joined
20 Oct 2014
Messages
101,125
Location
"Marston Vale mafia"
Entirely possible for the cables to have been damaged by the derailment, but (if, and it’s a BIG ‘if’, that’s what happened) damaged in such a way as to give a proceed aspect to a following train, especially when there’s two ways to approach from? That’s sheer bad luck. I can’t think of another instance of something like that happening. The full circumstances will come out in time.

I suppose an advantage of axle counters is that a unit leaving the rails entirely can't result in a section appearing empty. I assume the signalling isn't clever enough to realise that a train "disappearing", i.e. leaving a block but not having entered the next one, hasn't actually left it?
 

zwk500

Veteran Member
Joined
20 Jan 2020
Messages
14,372
Location
Bristol
From the Telegraph Website "It is understood that the 1708 Portsmouth Harbour to Bristol Temple Meads train, a Great Western service, hit an object as it came out of a tunnel near Salisbury station and the rear carriage derailed."
This is speculation at this time. Wait for the RAIB.
 

Metal_gee_man

Member
Joined
28 Oct 2017
Messages
669
Politics For All has leaked the incident report on Twitter


WICC: Incident Message Red: 1F30/1L53 derailment and collision

1F30 has struck an object in Fishwrton tunnel on the down line approaching Salisbury.
1F30 has derailed in the tunnel and 1L53 has then struck 1F30.
Both trains are derailed and 1F30 is on its side.
No injuries reported on 1L53. The driver is trapped in the cab and its unknown if they are injured.
No information on the passengers and crew on 1F30.
Multiple staff on en route and emergency services have declared this as a critical incident
 

Attachments

  • 20211031_205940.jpg
    20211031_205940.jpg
    83.6 KB · Views: 345

30907

Veteran Member
Joined
30 Sep 2012
Messages
19,532
Location
Airedale
Is the junction layout a diamond or a pair of single lead turnouts and up-down facing crossover? I wonder if the southbound GWR passing the junction has any bearing on the route the SWR service has taken to come into collision with the preceding GWR.
Conventional double junction.
 

Bletchleyite

Veteran Member
Joined
20 Oct 2014
Messages
101,125
Location
"Marston Vale mafia"
Wow, that looks bad. Lucky escape for all on board. Also very lucky it didn't result in fuel everywhere and the possible effects of that in a tunnel which don't really bear thinking about.

In some ways not dissimilar to the collision in the tunnel north of Watford a few years ago?
 

paulmch

Member
Joined
20 Dec 2018
Messages
124
Whoever from the industry has leaked the control logs and images of the incident should have the book thrown at them...
 

bramling

Veteran Member
Joined
5 Mar 2012
Messages
18,205
Location
Hertfordshire / Teesdale
I suppose an advantage of axle counters is that a unit leaving the rails entirely can't result in a section appearing empty. I assume the signalling isn't clever enough to realise that a train "disappearing", i.e. leaving a block but not having entered the next one, hasn't actually left it?

It’s certainly technically possible to design signalling such that track circuits must be operated in a logical order, and for signals to be turned to danger if an irregularity is detected.
 

Metal_gee_man

Member
Joined
28 Oct 2017
Messages
669
Whoever from the industry has leaked the control logs and images of the incident should have the book thrown at them...
I agree, I shared the image from politics for all and typed it out for accessibility purposes for our visually impaired readers so I hope no thanks I'm glorifying it just helping out
 

AzureOtsu

Member
Joined
2 Jan 2021
Messages
174
Location
Hove
i was on the train behind this at andover when i was directed back to basingstoke. sitting with a signaller who works at salisbury and he says he had no idea until i told him what happened
 

_toommm_

Established Member
Joined
8 Jul 2017
Messages
5,958
Location
Yorkshire
Let's remember aswell that this forum has been quoted before in the media, with the speculation being took as fact. There's currently 850 guests browsing this thread, and we wouldn't want anything that's conjecture on here to be publicised as fact.
 

43096

On Moderation
Joined
23 Nov 2015
Messages
15,966
Do we know that 1L53 was definitely involved? Reason I ask is that 159102 (which is the incident unit) shows as having been on the rear of 1L49 and detached at Salisbury.
 

D6130

Established Member
Joined
12 Jan 2021
Messages
6,536
Location
West Yorkshire/Tuscany
Is the junction layout a diamond or a pair of single lead turnouts and up-down facing crossover? I wonder if the southbound GWR passing the junction has any bearing on the route the SWR service has taken to come into collision with the preceding GWR.
It's a diamond crossing. Not enough room for a ladder junction.
 

zwk500

Veteran Member
Joined
20 Jan 2020
Messages
14,372
Location
Bristol
i was on the train behind this at andover when i was directed back to basingstoke. sitting with a signaller who works at salisbury and he says he had no idea until i told him what happened
Of course the bloke next to you on the train, who happens to be a signaller, wouldn't know as he's not on duty!
 

357

Established Member
Joined
12 Nov 2018
Messages
1,559
Of course the bloke next to you on the train, who happens to be a signaller, wouldn't know as he's not on duty!
You'd be surprised how much staff who are not working know about incidents that happen when they are off.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Top