Container Ship Charter Rates “Off the charts”

[Kremlin Stooge]

From American Shipper at FreightWaves: https://www.freightwaves.com/news/c...ff-the-charts-fantasy-charter-rate-135000-day

In a sign of just how frenzied the container market has become, a freight forwarder is reportedly paying $135,000 per day for a short-term charter of the S Santiago, a 15-year-old container ship with a capacity of 5,060 twenty-foot equivalent units (TEUs).


“Charter rates for short employment … have gone out of control,” said Alphaliner in its new weekly report.


“Depending on the sources, the ship would have obtained anything between $100,000 and $145,000 per day, an absolute historic high. The name of the charterer has not been fully confirmed, although it is believed to be a forwarder.”


An industry source speaking to American Shipper on condition of anonymity said the rate was $135,000 per day, the duration was 45-90 days (one round voyage with an option for a second) and the charterer was Chinese freight forwarder 3 Seas.


The source said that there is “more and more enquiry every day” with “people panicking now” amid “unprecedented times.”


Alphaliner said that “this colossal rate is substantially higher than the already whopping $70,000-$90,000 per day — depending on the final duration — agreed recently by Hapag-Lloyd for a two- to three-month employment of the 4,308-TEU CMA CGM Opal.”



The industry source told American Shipper that the S Santiago deal was concluded last week and that he wouldn’t be surprised if a new record were reached this week.


According to U.K.-based valuation and data provider VesselsValue, the 2006-built S Santiago is owned by Cyprus Sea Lines and is currently valued at $38.48 million.


To put the enormity of the charter deal in perspective, the shipowner will earn back one-sixth of the ship’s value in a single voyage — and one-third of the vessel’s value if the charterer takes the option for the second voyage.

What this means for cargo shippers​

The historic S Santiago transaction is yet another big red flag for cargo shippers. Charter rates like this only make sense if freight rates are high enough for the charterer to turn a profit.


It also underscores just how tight vessel supply is.


Alphaliner reported that only 2.7% of the global container fleet was inactive as of May 24, totaling 660,662 TEUs. Of that, 70% (461,779 TEUs) was inactive due to ships being in the yards for repairs or maintenance.



And cargo shippers will not be getting any relief in the near or medium term from newbuild deliveries.


There has been a surge of orders recently, but those are for 2023-2024 deliveries. Clarksons Research Services estimates that fleet growth in 2022 will fall to 2.5% from 4.6% this year.

 

[Neo9320]

This is not a topic I had ever looked in to before, but now I’m intrigued…thank you very much for sharing. Very interesting article!

 

[Bald Rick]

It’s been like this for months, and is why the prices of light but bulky products that we import (eg garden furniture) have also shot up. It’s not just the ship rates that have risen, but container rates themselves are at record highs. The manufacturers can’t make them quick enough, and shippers are doing all sorts of things to get them back to port quickly (often refusing back hauls, which actually makes the problem worse).

The bubble will burst soon enough.

 

[61653 HTAFC]

A shortage of shipping containers, you say...?

Hmmm... how many containers could we get out of melted down 442s?

 

[Bald Rick]

A shortage of shipping containers, you say...?

Hmmm... how many containers could we get out of melted down 442s?

I don’t think plastic containers are the answer...

 

[61653 HTAFC]

I don’t think plastic containers are the answer...

I suppose some countries wouldn't be too happy if told that their shipping containers "used to be pigs"...

 

[Giugiaro]

I guess this video sums it up quite well:

 

[ATW Alex 101]

I work in this industry and can confirm that the price of containers have been affected as stated in the OP!