• Our new ticketing site is now live! Using either this or the original site (both powered by TrainSplit) helps support the running of the forum with every ticket purchase! Find out more and ask any questions/give us feedback in this thread!

Cornish or Thames Valley branches could be converted to light rail?

cslusarc

Member
Joined
27 Jan 2011
Messages
164
Moderator note: split from

Are any Cornish or Thames Valley branch lines are ripe for conversion to Tramway/Light Rail Technology?
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Sponsor Post - registered members do not see these adverts; click here to register, or click here to log in
R

RailUK Forums

I'm here now

Member
Joined
26 Aug 2023
Messages
88
Location
Cornwall
Moderator note: split from

Are any Cornish or Thames Valley branch lines are ripe for conversion to Tramway/Light Rail Technology?
St Ives - it’s slow enough!
 

Mgameing123

Member
Joined
29 Apr 2023
Messages
475
Location
Denmark
Moderator note: split from

Are any Cornish or Thames Valley branch lines are ripe for conversion to Tramway/Light Rail Technology?
I wouldn’t recommend light rail but it is possible. I’d rather focus on getting High Wycombe to Bourne End reopened as heavy rail to allow more freight and better passenger connections.
 

edwin_m

Veteran Member
Joined
21 Apr 2013
Messages
25,957
Location
Nottingham
What would be the benefit? Light rail vehicles are generally more expensive per seat than trains, and there is no obvious advantage to having a vehicle on these branches that can run on the street. Also, if the branch vehicle couldn't run on the main line, each branch would need some sort of maintenance facility.
 

The Planner

Veteran Member
Joined
15 Apr 2008
Messages
16,901
I wouldn’t recommend light rail but it is possible. I’d rather focus on getting High Wycombe to Bourne End reopened as heavy rail to allow more freight and better passenger connections.
What freight use does the Bourne End branch have? The Chiltern line is basically useless for freight.
 

The Planner

Veteran Member
Joined
15 Apr 2008
Messages
16,901
The Calvert freight trains and a potential diversion of the Acton freight trains via the New North Mainline.
Not enough of them to even make a dent, and the fact you would have to find a path on the GW reliefs which would be nigh on impossible.
 

Mgameing123

Member
Joined
29 Apr 2023
Messages
475
Location
Denmark
Not enough of them to even make a dent, and the fact you would have to find a path on the GW reliefs which would be nigh on impossible.
The current Acton freight trains already steal alot of capacity. By moving them to the New North Mainline you will be able the frequency of the Elizabeth Line.
 

The Planner

Veteran Member
Joined
15 Apr 2008
Messages
16,901
The current Acton freight trains already steal alot of capacity. By moving them to the New North Mainline you will be able the frequency of the Elizabeth Line.
Which ones, the Mendips? Any Acton trains towards the Chilterns go via Acton Canal Wharf and Neasden. Everything else currently is HS2 aggregate related which will cease in 2-3 years.
 

Mgameing123

Member
Joined
29 Apr 2023
Messages
475
Location
Denmark
Which ones, the Mendips? Any Acton trains towards the Chilterns go via Acton Canal Wharf and Neasden. Everything else currently is HS2 aggregate related which will cease in 2-3 years.
I don't think you understand. Its more the the freight trains that head in the Reading direction. Instead of going via the GWML and taking up capacity on the Elizabeth Line. they could be redirected onto the New North Mainline then the Chiltern line until around Loudwater and onto the Wycombe Railway.
 

MarlowDonkey

Established Member
Joined
4 Apr 2013
Messages
1,262
Instead of going via the GWML and taking up capacity on the Elizabeth Line. they could be redirected onto the New North Mainline then the Chiltern line until around Loudwater and onto the Wycombe Railway.
There's a lot of development along the old route of the Wycombe Railway between Bourne End and High Wycombe. But even if it was rebuilt, it's still facing the wrong way at High Wycombe. For that matter the former junction to the New North at Old Oak Common is the Paddington side of Acton yard.
 

mrcheek

Established Member
Joined
11 Sep 2007
Messages
1,518
I suspect any future light rail conversions will wait and see how well it works on the Cardiff Valley lines.

So when that turns out to be an absolute disaster, the idea of tram-trains, and light rail conversion will be abandoned for good....
 

MarkyT

Established Member
Joined
20 May 2012
Messages
6,659
Location
Torbay
What would be the benefit? Light rail vehicles are generally more expensive per seat than trains, and there is no obvious advantage to having a vehicle on these branches that can run on the street. Also, if the branch vehicle couldn't run on the main line, each branch would need some sort of maintenance facility.
I wonder if the same price metric applies for the latest fleets of tram-trains in Cardiff and light metro units for T&W which will both interrun with general rail traffic in places (and both, incidentally, have magnetic track brakes. Stadler's new Merseyrail units don't appear to have this feature). A custom lighter vehicle could still have tighter curving and steeper hill-climbing abilities than typical on HR without having to meet street running requirements. That might help save money and destruction in any future extensions built.
 

daodao

Established Member
Joined
6 Feb 2016
Messages
3,194
Location
Dunham/Bowdon
I suspect any future light rail conversions will wait and see how well it works on the Cardiff Valley lines.

So when that turns out to be an absolute disaster, the idea of tram-trains, and light rail conversion will be abandoned for good....
There is a case for light rail conversion of heavy rail lines where they can be linked into existing light rail networks such as Blackpool, Croydon and Manchester. However, there is no point in converting isolated heavy rail routes such as the Cornish or Thames Valley branch lines to light rail.
 

MarkyT

Established Member
Joined
20 May 2012
Messages
6,659
Location
Torbay
There is a case for light rail conversion of heavy rail lines where they can be linked into existing light rail networks such as Blackpool, Croydon and Manchester. However, there is no point in converting isolated heavy rail routes such as the Cornish or Thames Valley branch lines to light rail.
The boundaries are blurring more now. I agree conversion to isolated LR, with necessarily dedicated servicing and maintenance facilities on each branch is not sensible unless one was to be incorporated into a more extensive new LR network locally, where the depot overhead could be spread more widely. Developing some lighter more agile rolling stock that can still interrun, possibly as part of the branch route from major station to the junction or to access depots could still be worthwhile, especially if some 'lighter' extensions are planned in the future.
 

Bletchleyite

Veteran Member
Joined
20 Oct 2014
Messages
101,819
Location
"Marston Vale mafia"
There is a case for light rail conversion of heavy rail lines where they can be linked into existing light rail networks such as Blackpool, Croydon and Manchester. However, there is no point in converting isolated heavy rail routes such as the Cornish or Thames Valley branch lines to light rail.

Might any of the branches in question benefit from a short street extension?
 

daodao

Established Member
Joined
6 Feb 2016
Messages
3,194
Location
Dunham/Bowdon
That may be so, but what future extensions are in prospect for the routes that are the subject of this thread?
Re-opening Bere Alston to Tavistock has been postulated, which would join the existing route to Gunnislake (a Cornish branch line) at Bere Alston.

Might any of the branches in question benefit from a short street extension?
I don't think so.
 

MarkyT

Established Member
Joined
20 May 2012
Messages
6,659
Location
Torbay
That may be so, but what future extensions are in prospect for the routes that are the subject of this thread?
The only one that has come up so far is Bourne End - High Wycombe. Any alternative new route for that would probably require some impressive hill-climbing abilities.
 

The Planner

Veteran Member
Joined
15 Apr 2008
Messages
16,901
I don't think you understand. Its more the the freight trains that head in the Reading direction. Instead of going via the GWML and taking up capacity on the Elizabeth Line. they could be redirected onto the New North Mainline then the Chiltern line until around Loudwater and onto the Wycombe Railway.
Clearly I don't. Do you mean the connection is put back in at OOC to West Ruislip (which it isn't) then they go up to Princes Risborough to run round (which it isn't long enough for) to go down to Maidenhead and still be facing the wrong way?
 

AlastairFraser

Established Member
Joined
12 Aug 2018
Messages
2,897
I think that it is a decent idea to trial perhaps Revolution VLR as a shuttle on the Bere Alston-Gunnislake branch, if the Tavistock extension is built and that branch takes the through trains to Plymouth.
It will test the unit's ability to handle sharp curves and also a live test of the realistic operational costs.

The latter data would be particularly useful if a low-cost solution was sought to reopen other rural branches in the SW to passenger service e.g. Lostwithiel to Fowey or a reopened Chard Jcn to Chard.
 

zwk500

Veteran Member
Joined
20 Jan 2020
Messages
14,517
Location
Bristol
I think that it is a decent idea to trial perhaps Revolution VLR as a shuttle on the Bere Alston-Gunnislake branch, if the Tavistock extension is built and that branch takes the through trains to Plymouth.
It will test the unit's ability to handle sharp curves and also a live test of the realistic operational costs.

The latter data would be particularly useful if a low-cost solution was sought to reopen other rural branches in the SW to passenger service e.g. Lostwithiel to Fowey or a reopened Chard Jcn to Chard.
Reopening the Tavistock line to allow a trial to take place on the orphaned section is certainly an 'outside the box' justification.

If you wanted to test the VLR on an isolated line why not Liskaerd to Looe?
 

zwk500

Veteran Member
Joined
20 Jan 2020
Messages
14,517
Location
Bristol
With it being Coventry based and with the Parry units starting to get very knackered, Stourbridge is the sensible first try, not somewhere down in the Westcountry.
Agreed, but this thread is about Cornish or Thames Valley Branches.
 

Ashley Hill

Established Member
Joined
8 Dec 2019
Messages
3,755
Location
The West Country
Surely Light Rail is for urban/suburban services that are highly populated requiring a frequent service. I cannot see the Cornish branches falling into this category.
 

Bletchleyite

Veteran Member
Joined
20 Oct 2014
Messages
101,819
Location
"Marston Vale mafia"
Agreed, but this thread is about Cornish or Thames Valley Branches.

I know, what I'm saying is that Cornish and Thames Valley branches aren't the right place for that unit, or at least not yet.

Surely Light Rail is for urban/suburban services that are highly populated requiring a frequent service. I cannot see the Cornish branches falling into this category.

It's a cheapo 153, basically. The difference between light and heavy rail is getting very blurred these days.
 

JLH4AC

Member
Joined
15 Jul 2023
Messages
156
Location
Market Rasen
It depends on what you mean by light rail, modern lightweight railcars (Such as Stadler FLIRT, Siemens Desiro, and Stadler GTW.) are often referred to as light rail/hybrid rail in the US such vehicles or remanufactured alternatives such as class 230 would be ideally suited for those branch lines, especially considering that peak demand on some of these lines can justify three two-car class 150 sets being coupled together yet normal demand can barely justify a single two-car class 150 set.

Light metro would be overkill, and demand on these lines is often too great for ultra light vehicles. Tram-trains would only make sense to me if harbour tramways were to be restored as part of seafront redevelopment or street running was used to extend some of the branch lines, otherwise you are ordering vehicles with unneeded features or heavily modifying a design to perform a role that that another existing design can do just as well.
 

AlastairFraser

Established Member
Joined
12 Aug 2018
Messages
2,897
Reopening the Tavistock line to allow a trial to take place on the orphaned section is certainly an 'outside the box' justification.

If you wanted to test the VLR on an isolated line why not Liskaerd to Looe?
Oh, I don't propose reopening it just for that purpose. I just think Bere Alston to Gunnislake would be ideal, and the opportunity to test Revolution VLR there would be a bonus, as well as the many direct benefits reopening Bere Alston/Plymouth to Tavistock will bring.
 

Ashley Hill

Established Member
Joined
8 Dec 2019
Messages
3,755
Location
The West Country
Oh, I don't propose reopening it just for that purpose. I just think Bere Alston to Gunnislake would be ideal, and the opportunity to test Revolution VLR there would be a bonus, as well as the many direct benefits reopening Bere Alston/Plymouth to Tavistock will bring.
Would a VLR cope with the gradient though. It’s also very slippery between Okeltor and Sandways crossings. At least they don’t have to routinely stop at them anymore.
 

Top