XC just don't look after them. The condition of VTWC's sets is markedly superior.
After 17 years in service I would expect front line stock on a long distance franchise to be overdue a comprehensive internal refurbishment. However the cancellation of the franchise process and delay in any alternative arrangements is probably delaying this. Another example where the breakdown in the franchising process is not putting passengers first.
Strip the interior to a bare shell and start again from scratch. Not unreasonable for a mid life refurb.They are all maintained at the same place. Are you suggesting that Central Rivers treat the two fleets differently?
The XC Voyagers have had one refit when the shop was taken out - it is just that they retained the same moquette on the seats.
I'm not sure what you would do in a 'comprehensive internal refurbishment'. You can't really reconfigure the interior and although they have been in service for 17 years the interior, whilst very familiar, isn't particularly dated.
I dunno, the interior colour scheme is pretty dated. Particularly the panelling in that weird off-white/yellow colour, and the silver panelling in the vestibules that makes me think of a 20-year-old sci-fi set!
Scrapping would be a better alternative, Voyagers are quite simply, horrid.
They are all maintained at the same place. Are you suggesting that Central Rivers treat the two fleets differently?
Might I suggest a midlife refurb and extension to 6 carriages.
The model is no longer manufactured, so additional carriages would carry the great expense of reproducing the old production lines.
Or just get new trains to replace the HSTs and some Voyagers so the Voyagers can run in multiple.Then might I suggest new units able to work in multiple with 22x units, possibly to extend all trains to 8/9/10 cars during peak hours
Scrapping would be a better alternative, Voyagers are quite simply, horrid.
Or just get new trains to replace the HSTs and some Voyagers so the Voyagers can run in multiple.
They are all maintained at the same place. Are you suggesting that Central Rivers treat the two fleets differently?
Once you get past that it’s a multiple unit not a HST or coaches hauled by a class 47, and excluding the fact that they are often over crowded, what exactly are wrong with Voyagers?
They seem to generate extreme hate and I’m sure half the reasons are due to the above. Would a 8 car class 8xx be better than 2x220?
Once you get past that it’s a multiple unit not a HST or coaches hauled by a class 47, and excluding the fact that they are often over crowded, what exactly are wrong with Voyagers?
They seem to generate extreme hate and I’m sure half the reasons are due to the above. Would a 8 car class 8xx be better than 2x220?
Cramped, uncomfortable, the toilets reek and they are generally just diabolical. I put Voyagers on my list of disliked rolling stock right up next to the Class 158. Pendolinos are only a slight improvment on Voyagers. IMHO they should really just design and build a modern day equivalent of the HST with a loco at each end and some DECENT coaches in between, how hard can it actually be?
Once you get past that it’s a multiple unit not a HST or coaches hauled by a class 47, and excluding the fact that they are often over crowded, what exactly are wrong with Voyagers?
They seem to generate extreme hate and I’m sure half the reasons are due to the above. Would a 8 car class 8xx be better than 2x220?
Transpennine have, brand new Mark 5a coaches with a driving car and a class 68 on the front pushing and pulling, the class 68 could also be changed to a class 88 dual mode OHLE/Diesel loco for CrossCountry servicesCramped, uncomfortable, the toilets reek and they are generally just diabolical. I put Voyagers on my list of disliked rolling stock right up next to the Class 158. Pendolinos are only a slight improvment on Voyagers. IMHO they should really just design and build a modern day equivalent of the HST with a loco at each end and some DECENT coaches in between, how hard can it actually be?
Strip the interior to a bare shell and start again from scratch. Not unreasonable for a mid life refurb.
Agreed.
Strip out, fit new interior including seats better aligned to windows and with more tables, sort out loo stench, and reduce amount of wasted space near carriage ends by cutting number of bike racks and out of use cubby holes (or shops) as well as losing.
Send to Scotland following refurbishment for duties now being covered by HST's.
Something '802-ish' of appropriate length could and should have been / still be procured to operate long distance XC services.
But, with the way this country's railways are run, no.
Strip the interior to a bare shell and start again from scratch. Not unreasonable for a mid life refurb.
They are all maintained at the same place. Are you suggesting that Central Rivers treat the two fleets differently?
I never thought it possible as a Far wesr GWR traveller, but the voyagers are far far better than the IETs, at least in 1st
1st in an IET is way below a Voyager, and evn XC coffee is better than GWR