CRRC is a Chinese publicly traded rolling stock manufacturer, formed on 1 June 2015 with the merger of CNR and CSR.
As of 2016 it had 183,061 employees, and is by far the largest rolling stock manufacturer in the world eclipsing Alstom and Siemens.
Pacesetter is a name that rather has the wrong ring to it in the arena of British railways...
Chinese rolling stock manufacturer CSR Nanjing Puzhen Rolling Stock Co announced on May 21 that it plans to offer electric multiple-units from its Pacemaker family in response to a call for tenders to supply London Midland with between 40 and 120 vehicles.
CRRC are on the shortlist for the new Tyne & Wear Metro units so are trying to make an entry in to the UK market.CRRC, the merger of CNR and CSR (of which CSRE was part), is the firm you need to worry about.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/CRRC
They are not on the shortlist for any UK bids, not even for HS2.
However, they are active worldwide, eg they are building EMUs for Sydney Trains.
They renamed it to Pacesetter.The emu design was called Pacemaker. From Railway Gazette back in 2009
The obvious problem is still there though... makes it seem deliberate!They renamed it to Pacesetter.
Who Are They?
My cynical view is that someone expected to make his fortune by applying a relatively large markup to cheaper Chinese rolling stock, while still undercutting the usual European train builders. No-one seems to have taken up the offer back then...
Yes. They would be cheap for a reason. You'd get no support for them, so getting acceptance would be a costly exercise for the operator for a start.Well I mean plenty of european products on the market right now are pretty cheap anyways, could these trains be much worse?
Heavily pushed by the consultant who acted as GC's Engineering Director in the early days. Funnily enough, he was also acting as a consultant to a Chinese train builder wanting to break into the UK market.From what I can remember from the time they were part of the same group that originally owned Grand Central and Alliance Rails expansion plans featured CSRE built trains replacing the HSTs, the revival of GNER brand for what eventually became GCs Bradford services operating services from Huddersfield and Stalybridge to London as GNWR and also had Blackpool as new services. None of the plans came to fruition and GC and alliance rail is now owned by Arriva.
Pacesetter is a name that rather has the wrong ring to it in the arena of British railways...
Heavily pushed by the consultant who acted as GC's Engineering Director in the early days. Funnily enough, he was also acting as a consultant to a Chinese train builder wanting to break into the UK market.
Pacesetter and Pacer are to some extent synonyms.I've apparently forgotten some past event. Or else there's a double-entendre that I'm too innocent to understand. Can you explain?
Apparently CAF didn't expect to be giving the level of support that was assumed for their new buildsYes. They would be cheap for a reason. You'd get no support for them, so getting acceptance would be a costly exercise for the operator for a start.
I've apparently forgotten some past event. Or else there's a double-entendre that I'm too innocent to understand. Can you explain?
Pretty much. If I was trying to sell a train for use in Northern England, I'd avoid calling it anything that sounded like "pacer"!Pacesetter and Pacer are to some extent synonyms.
I'm pretty sure CSRE were present at Railtex one year; certainly, David Shipley was present representing them, but I can't remember from my conversation with him if he was there as MD of the company or as an agent/etc.
The emu design was called Pacemaker. From Railway Gazette back in 2009:
https://www.railwaygazette.com/news/single-view/view/csr-to-offer-pacemaker-emu-in-britain.html
Given how utterly useless he was as GC’s Engineering Director then it is no surprise they didn’t win an order. There was a documentary made many years ago about GC’s start up and his inability to manage suppliers was shocking.David Shipley was the MD of CSRE and he was once a member of this very website some years ago using the username Kingfisher200262.
Thanks for answering my question, and thanks to jopsuk as well. If I was buying a train for use in Northern England, or the South West or Wales, its name wouldn't be my no.1 preoccupation. Apparently Greater Anglia and Merseyrail weren't much concerned about names either, when they ordered something called Flirt.Pretty much. If I was trying to sell a train for use in Northern England, I'd avoid calling it anything that sounded like "pacer"!
That is an awful render. That end gangway door looks like it was lifted from another image.The emu design was called Pacemaker. From Railway Gazette back in 2009:
https://www.railwaygazette.com/news/single-view/view/csr-to-offer-pacemaker-emu-in-britain.html