Cumbria - Manchester route validity

Discussion in 'Fares Advice & Policy' started by neilmc, 16 Mar 2017.

Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. neilmc

    neilmc Member

    Messages:
    672
    Joined:
    23 Oct 2011
    Principally for Penrith but I assume the answer will apply for anywhere Lancaster-Carlisle. For an off-peak return going via:

    Wigan North Western (TPE) - obviously valid as the direct train

    Preston and Bolton - obviously valid as the shortest distance

    Wigan North Western/ Wallgate - presumably valid as shown by journey planners. Raises an interesting question though as this is NEITHER the shortest journey or a direct train even though it's shorter than the direct train (TPE) so could it technically be NOT valid?

    Warrington Bank Quay/ Central. As per Wigan. I am intending breaking my return journey overnight at Irlam, do you think there is any possibility I will have difficulty with Northern guards?

    Just as an optional extra, would this ticket be valid via Preston and Blackburn?
     
  2. yorkie

    yorkie Administrator Staff Member Administrator

    Messages:
    34,588
    Joined:
    6 Jun 2005
    Location:
    Yorkshire
    Origin Routeing Point – Oxenholme Lake District
    Destination Routeing Point – MANCHESTER GROUP

    This is valid as it's traceable on map MX
    I note you do not ask if it's valid this way, but in case you or anyone else is wondering ;), it's traceable on maps XW+NR

    But to answer the question: I do not think you will have problems with Northern Guards.
    Yes, on map MX

    (Maps can be viewed here http://data.atoc.org/routeing-maps)
     
  3. neilmc

    neilmc Member

    Messages:
    672
    Joined:
    23 Oct 2011
    Thanks, I was assuming via Warrington would be OK since

    a) when travelling from East Midlands to Cumbria via Manchester, this is a standard routing avoiding changing in Manchester, assuming you don't mind trolling across Warrington centre with luggage just to get a Pendolino!

    b) when going on to the Network Rail site and asking for journeys Penrith to Manchester, this option is also given for a few journeys.
     
  4. yorkie

    yorkie Administrator Staff Member Administrator

    Messages:
    34,588
    Joined:
    6 Jun 2005
    Location:
    Yorkshire
    I agree, but it surprised me given your doubts about whether it's valid to go via Wigan Wallgate, which is a shorter route than via Warrington.

    That said, you can never assume anything with the Routeing Guide :lol:

    Also, no need to cross Warrington centre if there's a suitably timed train from Bank Quay to Manchester.
     
  5. kieron

    kieron Established Member

    Messages:
    1,677
    Joined:
    22 Mar 2012
    Location:
    Connah's Quay
    Indeed you can't. Penrith-Manchester is not valid on the trains between Warrington Bank Quay and Manchester, as there are no mapped routes via Earlestown Group (which is between them). A Penrith-Stalybridge ticket would be valid that way, though.
     
  6. Bletchleyite

    Bletchleyite Veteran Member

    Messages:
    19,744
    Joined:
    20 Oct 2014
    Location:
    Up and down the south WCML (mostly)
    The Routeing Guide really could do with being recursive.

    FWIW, talking about old style Reasonable Routes, I would say Chorley is clearly OK, Wigan is a bit south but still sort-of OK, Warrington is taking the mick a bit, particularly the CLC.

    However if you use NRE it does give you a non-split route via the CLC.
     
    Last edited: 17 Mar 2017
  7. Merseysider

    Merseysider Established Member Fares Advisor

    Messages:
    3,538
    Joined:
    22 Jan 2014
    Location:
    North West
    Warrington is perfectly reasonable imo. Part of what used to constitute a reasonable route was how quick it was to complete the journey that way. Local connections off the WCML can be horrendously bad after about 7pm or 8pm so it's only natural that as many options be open to passengers as possible.

    FWIW I've heard guards/TMs advising pax (southbound) to change at Bank Quay for the ATW to Manchester, and I've never had an issue using tickets from Carlisle or further north on either route east from Warrington.
     
  8. LNW-GW Joint

    LNW-GW Joint Established Member

    Messages:
    10,016
    Joined:
    22 Feb 2011
    Location:
    Mold, Clwyd
    Routeing via Warrington BQ/Central figures on a surprisingly large set of journeys, eg Leeds-Southampton Any Permitted, as noted on another thread.
    The options probably date back to the point on BR when the CLC route became virtually the only through route across Manchester with the running down of "LNWR/L&Y" routes via Wigan/Earlestown.
    I could imagine these options might disappear now the L&M is becoming the primary east-west route (again), with TPE not operating via the CLC.
     
  9. kieron

    kieron Established Member

    Messages:
    1,677
    Joined:
    22 Mar 2012
    Location:
    Connah's Quay
    Do you mean something like the following?

    Oxenholme-Warrington Bank Quay is valid this way because it's the shortest route.
    Warrington Bank Quay-Manchester Piccadilly is valid that way because that's the shortest route.
    Therefore, Oxenholme-Manchester Piccadilly is valid going first this way then that.

    If you do, the routeing guide wouldn't be worth much as almost any route is valid using the above logic. If you mean something else, whatever it is probably wouldn't allow the above route on an Oxenholme-Manchester ticket in the first place.
     
  10. Merseysider

    Merseysider Established Member Fares Advisor

    Messages:
    3,538
    Joined:
    22 Jan 2014
    Location:
    North West
    I think he means that if a route is permitted between A and Z, the relevant part of that same route should also be permitted between B and Y, etc
     
  11. kieron

    kieron Established Member

    Messages:
    1,677
    Joined:
    22 Mar 2012
    Location:
    Connah's Quay
    I don't know what he meant. All I have is the word "recursive" and a suggestion that the change it represents is relevant to this thread.

    If it means anything, "recursive" implies that something is repeated in some way. You wouldn't need to repeat anything to find a route from A to Z. You'd only need to know which A and Z to use.

    For all I know, the word may have just been chosen because it sounds nice.
     
  12. John @ home

    John @ home Established Member Fares Advisor

    Messages:
    4,965
    Joined:
    1 Mar 2008
    As far as I can trace, the word "recursive" was first used in the context of the National Routeing Guide some 10 years ago by Roland Perry on newsgroup uk.railway. In that discussion, a "recursive" Routeing Guide was taken to be one where:
    • if A - B is a Permitted route, and
    • x - A is a Permitted Route, and
    • B - y is a Permitted Route, then
    • x - A - B - y is a Permitted Route.
    That was (and is) not a feature of the National Routeing Guide.
     
    Last edited: 18 Mar 2017
  13. kieron

    kieron Established Member

    Messages:
    1,677
    Joined:
    22 Mar 2012
    Location:
    Connah's Quay
    Thanks for the background. Unless I'm missing something, that never could be part of the National Routeing Guide.

    If you simply added this to the NRCOC, then a passenger could say x is Wilnecote, y is Tamworth, and A-B is the journey he or she actually wants to make. Then buy an x-y ticket and break the journey to suit. I'm sure there's something else to it, though.
     
  14. sheff1

    sheff1 Established Member

    Messages:
    3,046
    Joined:
    24 Dec 2009
    Location:
    Sheffield
    I understand recursive meant that if, say, a ticket from Penrith to Manchester was valid via Warrington then it would automatically be valid via all permitted routes between (i) Penrith & Warrington and (ii) Warrington and Manchester.

    Such provision is not in the Routeing Guide at present. There are cases where a ticket is valid A - C via B and a ticket from B - C is valid via x or y, but a ticket from A - C is valid A - B - x- C but is not valid A - B -y -C.
     
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.

Share This Page