sprinterguy
Established Member
I apologise if my light hearted jest has caused any manner of offence, it wasn't intended for anyone to get exercised about. I didn't realise that Barrow genuinely had any willing defenders, so kudos to you and thank you for introducing a sense of mild surprise to my afternoon.Oh how we laugh at the 'longest cul-de-sac' jibe! It came from a comedian (Mike Harding). You understand how comedians make jokes? (Never been to Scarborough, Whitby, Devon & Cornwall, Hull, etc?)
I'm quite familiar with the work of Mike Harding and I certainly don't need the craft of comedy explained to me, but there's an element of truth to the majority of stereotypes.
I have been to all the places you have listed apart from Hull, and none of them have felt as far removed from everywhere else as Barrow. For sure it doesn't feel anywhere near as remote as some areas of the Scottish Highlands for example, but such areas give a very different sense of isolation rather than deprivation.
The Dock Museum is pretty good, but I think that also having to resort to listing the Wetherspoons as one of the attractions of a town is clutching at straws a bit.A couple of hours in Barrow? Unfortunately the National League form team have no game that day so you'll have to make do with admiring the Victorian architecture, visit the Dock Museum, walk around the wonderful public park, visit one of the four nature reserves, take a stroll on one of the beaches or, I suppose, even visit 'The Duke' outside the station or look at the pretty pictures of trains in the 'Furness Railway' a little further down Abbey Road. Helpfully, both serve not only good beers but hot drinks. You may need them after several hours in a carriage with the door windows open all the way from The Great Border City.
I believe that I answered your original question adequately. The source of the data is important as the initial cause attributed to delays or cancellations uploaded to publically accessible feeds such as Realtime Trains doesn't necessarily provide an accurate portrayal of the true reason and hence the cause of disruption can potentially be incorrectly attributed to the locomotives when, following investigation, it was proven to be no such thing.Of course a train may not turn up for many reasons but delay attribution is irrelevant to the figures I referred to and you have ignored my original question. If you have waited for a train to work, school or college at, say, Seascale then over a four-month period you have been twice as likely to have had a LHCS train cancelled, part-cancelled or more than thirty minutes late at its final destination compared with all trains on the two routes.
I have made no allegations against the unreliability of the loco hauled stock. The evidence in the available data, the number of cancellations and anecdotal evidence is conclusive. 87015's query was regarding the quality of the data collated by FLAG, not the quality of the stock itself!Given the large number of scheduled services run over a four-month period, can you suggest why that huge difference could be consistently attributable to any reason other than one type of train being inherently less reliable than the remainder?