Delay from Hayes & Harlington - Missed Onward Connection with Advance Ticket

Discussion in 'Fares Advice & Policy' started by CheesyChips, 20 Mar 2017.

Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. CheesyChips

    CheesyChips Member

    Messages:
    217
    Joined:
    18 Jun 2015
    Some thoughts on the following would be most helpful. Thank you in advance.

    My journey was from Hayes and Harlington to Old Hill, 20th March, for which I used contactless from Hayes and Harlington to Paddington (GWR), Paddington to Marylebone by tube then held an advance ticket for the 14:10 Chiltern Service to Birmingham (then local LM services to Old Hill to complete my journey).

    I boarded the 13:10 GWR service at Hayes and Harlington which became severely delayed between Southall and Ealing Broadway due to a failed Heathrow Connect service sat at West Ealing (so I’m told). The driver announced that he had been instructed to change ends and take us back to Hayes and Harlington to switch to the main line and take us into Paddington that way, which is what happened.

    Essentially, we arrived at Paddington 63 mins late http://www.realtimetrains.co.uk/train/C20960/2017/03/20

    I therefore missed the train at Marylebone for which I had an advance ticket but Chiltern quite happily endorsed my ticket for the 15:10 so nothing lost there but 1 hour of time.

    I have two questions:

    1. Did Chiltern endorse my ticket because they’re obliged to or because they used discretion?
    2. Do I have any recourse to make a claim for my delay between Hayes and Harlington and Paddington? I'm particularly interested because I used contactless.
     
  2. MikeWh

    MikeWh Established Member Senior Fares Advisor

    Messages:
    4,861
    Joined:
    15 Jun 2010
    Location:
    Crayford
    If the delay was verifiable and your original journey satisfied minimum connection times between Paddington and Marylebone then they should allow later travel. It's good to hear a TOC doing this.
    Yes. Your ticket can be verified by a journey history printout from TfL. Whatever compensation scheme GWR operate is the one you claim against.
     
  3. 455driver

    455driver Veteran Member

    Messages:
    11,332
    Joined:
    10 May 2010
    Where was your rail ticket actually from?
    If Marylebone then I am note sure you have any recourse because it is your responsibility to get to your starting station as listed on your ticket, thats why you would have been better with a ticket from H&H which would have been fine.
     
  4. Joe Paxton

    Joe Paxton Member

    Messages:
    877
    Joined:
    12 Jan 2017
    If you have not registered your contactless card with TfL, then you can get access to the last 7 day's journey & payment history by clicking on the link at the bottom left of this page. Then print it out - or, with some browsers (such as Chrome or Edge) you can natively 'print to PDF' which is useful if you want to keep a record saved to disk or if you don't have a printer.

    If you have registered your contactless card, then login as usual. If you choose this moment to register your contactless card then I'm pretty sure you also then get access to recent journey and payment history on that card.

    (A TfL account can have multiple contactless and/or Oyster cards attached to it, so you don't need a separate TfL account for each card.)
     
  5. crehld

    crehld Established Member Senior Fares Advisor

    Messages:
    1,952
    Joined:
    1 Nov 2014
    Location:
    Between Crewe & Hellifield
    This is quite incorrect. The Op held a ticket between Hayes and Harlington and Paddington (in the format of a contactless payment card). The National Rail Conditions of Travel explicitly permit passengers to use more than one ticket to complete their journey, and customers are entitled to delay repay or whatever compensation scheme is in place for their entire journey in circumstances of delay. As explained by the Op, they had already begun their journey at the point they were delayed. Chiltern were quite correct to permit the Op to board the next available service without hassle. As MikeWh stated, so long as the journey was above board with minimum connection times and the like the Op should be entitled to their due compensation.
     
  6. sheff1

    sheff1 Established Member

    Messages:
    3,046
    Joined:
    24 Dec 2009
    Location:
    Sheffield
    Hayes and Harlington, as clearly stated in the OP.
     
  7. yorkie

    yorkie Administrator Staff Member Administrator

    Messages:
    34,588
    Joined:
    6 Jun 2005
    Location:
    Yorkshire
    The former.

    The only loss of rights with using Contactless/Oyster on National Rail services is that you have to queue at the ticket office to get the delay verified. If you use paper tickets, you do not need to do this. As a result, you may miss a train and increase your entitlement to delay compensation, so it is surprising the rail industry has this requirement, but there you go. Full details are in the Advance Fares FAQ in The Manual, which is reproduced in our Fares Guide.
    You are entitled to delay compensation for your journey, which was between Hayes & Harlington and Old Hill.

    Be careful not to complicate matters in your compensation claim.

    Clearly state your journey was from Hayes & Harlington to Old Hill. I'd include a photograph of your paper ticket, a screenshot of your Contactless journey history and a screenshot showing the valid itinerary from Hayes & Harlington to Old Hill departing at 13:10.

    Indeed. I'll quote this again, and it's as true now as it was then:
     
  8. bb21

    bb21 Moderator Staff Member Moderator

    Messages:
    21,246
    Joined:
    4 Feb 2010
    I don't think this is quite there, as no ticket is involved. A contactless payment card is very clearly not a ticket. It is different to an Oyster which contains a Travelcard product. I have been looking for supporting material of this claim but am so far unable to find any. (It is quite possible that I might have missed it.)

    What this boils down to AIUI is that the OP had a valid itinerary, and travelled according to that itinerary. On touching in with his contactless payment card, the contract for conveyance is formed, at which point the delay to his journey was not known (very important). The question then surrounds whether an indeterminable product "purchased" at the time of touch-in (however becoming determined at touch-out) equates to a paper ticket purchased at the same time for the same journey travelled (in this case Hayes & Harlington - Marylebone). I don't think there is any confirmation either way although I would argue that it would be weak to be arguing otherwise, which is what then allows this product to be combined with other paper tickets in the usual manner.
     
  9. Mag_seven

    Mag_seven Established Member

    Messages:
    1,654
    Joined:
    1 Sep 2014
    Location:
    Almost the west country
    I hope that TOC's are now not going to start to wriggle out of their responsibilities if one part of a journey is made using contactless payment, bearing in mind that travel by means of contactless is bound to increase over the next few years.
     
  10. bb21

    bb21 Moderator Staff Member Moderator

    Messages:
    21,246
    Joined:
    4 Feb 2010
    I don't know, but I am uneasy with the certainty sometimes communicated on this forum that a contactless payment card equates a paper ticket. I have yet to see any supporting evidence of that.

    The only way to ease your worries for definite is for the status of contactless payment card to be clarified in the NRCoT, as it has been around for a number of years now and its usage only going to increase as you correctly stated, so the NRCoT really need to keep up with the development of new technology.
     
  11. crehld

    crehld Established Member Senior Fares Advisor

    Messages:
    1,952
    Joined:
    1 Nov 2014
    Location:
    Between Crewe & Hellifield
    Allow me to assist ;)

    For me this is enshrined in the Condition 4.2 in the National Rail Conditions of Travel:

    I'd argue use of a contactless payment card constitutes a ticket which is stored on a smartcard or electronic device. But you don't have to take my word for it. Helpfully, p.7 of the National Rail Conditions of Travel elaborates and contains the following note:

    Appendix B of the National Rail Conditions of Travel elaborates further and sets out the definitions of key terms used in the said Conditions of Travel. It defines a "ticket" as follows (my emphasis where it appears):

    I think on this basis we can rest assured that a contactless payment card constitutes a ticket on at least equal terms with its paper counterpart.

    Yes I agree completely - as is the case with all delay compensation claims where split tickets (paper or otherwise) are used.
     
  12. crehld

    crehld Established Member Senior Fares Advisor

    Messages:
    1,952
    Joined:
    1 Nov 2014
    Location:
    Between Crewe & Hellifield
    It already is clarified in the NRCoT!!
     
    Last edited: 21 Mar 2017
  13. maniacmartin

    maniacmartin Established Member Senior Fares Advisor

    Messages:
    4,849
    Joined:
    15 May 2012
    Location:
    Purley
    Even though the contactless payment card is now specified in the NRCoT, I still envisage it's use causing more complication than had a through paper ticket been used. It's difficult enough to get some TOCs to pay Delay Repay for all tickets used for the journey instead of just the ticket on which the delay occured without adding CPCs into the mix. This is especially true when the delay occured on a cheap ticket that connects with an expensive ticket.
     
    Last edited: 22 Mar 2017
  14. Joe Paxton

    Joe Paxton Member

    Messages:
    877
    Joined:
    12 Jan 2017
    I agree that there isn't the clarity regarding this that there could or should be - indeed looking at the London-area TOCs I don't think any actually mention contactless in terms of Delay Repay, and only some mention Oyster. (I haven't yet had reason to try a DR claim from a TOC when I was using contactless, though I have with Oyster.)

    I'd urge the OP to put in a Delay Repay claim for the whole journey to GWR though and see what happens. It makes logical sense to me, though I note manianmartin's comments above about some TOCs being awkward about paying Delay Repay on multiple tickets.
     
  15. sheff1

    sheff1 Established Member

    Messages:
    3,046
    Joined:
    24 Dec 2009
    Location:
    Sheffield
    There should not be any need to specify all the different possibilities of "ticket" in the Delay Repay guidance. A "ticket" is comprehensively defined in the NRCoT, from which crehid has helpfully posted the relevant extract above.
     
  16. sheff1

    sheff1 Established Member

    Messages:
    3,046
    Joined:
    24 Dec 2009
    Location:
    Sheffield
    As it had been in the NRCoC since at least May 2012 !
     
  17. Joe Paxton

    Joe Paxton Member

    Messages:
    877
    Joined:
    12 Jan 2017
    Fair enough, though many passengers won't have a clue about the NRCoT (its mere existence, let alone its contents!). Omitting any mention of Oyster and/or contactless doesn't exactly invite passengers who used those "tickets" to claim for Delay Repay... which of course might well be the very point of omitting any mention of them...

    (I also appreciate that getting a journey history for Oyster/contactless is a bit of a faff, and explaning how to do so is a bit involved.)
     
  18. MikeWh

    MikeWh Established Member Senior Fares Advisor

    Messages:
    4,861
    Joined:
    15 Jun 2010
    Location:
    Crayford
    I have!

    GTR paid out with a copy of the TfL journey history after a half hour delay between St Pancras and Wimbledon.
     
  19. bb21

    bb21 Moderator Staff Member Moderator

    Messages:
    21,246
    Joined:
    4 Feb 2010
    Yes, that is exactly what I was looking for. :D
     
  20. bb21

    bb21 Moderator Staff Member Moderator

    Messages:
    21,246
    Joined:
    4 Feb 2010
    Unfortunately we don't all have time to keep up with all the developments. That is why the forum appointed (Senior) Fares Advisors.

    Even taking a step back, with matters we have been aware of, sometimes they are missed or forgotten. Such is life.
     
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.

Share This Page