Yes that's right the engine we used went off to do another duty, and then went back to our engine shed when finnished.Well, back in those days locos sent for scrapping certainly had their motion removed in most cases. But there would be nothing wrong with keeping one loco fit for service to haul 2-3 to the scrappers. I'm sure this happened on many occasions, but in truth, I can't remember a single specific case.
And it's not clear what you are saying here, but the implication is that you took the scrappers into the yard with another locomotive, not condemned. Is that correct?
Welcome to the forum, BTW.
The fireman who worked 30506 from Feltham Loco. to Staines (where it failed) on its trip to Barry hailing 2 other engines for scrap was reunited with it in June this year at 506's return to traffic. I've no idea what the other engines were, but they were dumped in a siding at Staines.
Pat
This is very interesting. I had a footplate ride on 30506 at the Mid Hants many years ago and always loved the loco. I hadn’t heard the above story before though.According to Bradley (LSWR locomotives - The Urie Classes) they were three being hauled away by 30506 - 30499, 30841/7 and the date of dispatch from Feltham was 18/06/64. They had all been withdrawn on 05/01/64 (as per contemporary SLS Journals).
I remember having a good look, with others, at 30506 in about 1971 in Barry and the consensus was, that with a little work, it would have been possible to steam it out of there.This is very interesting. I had a footplate ride on 30506 at the Mid Hants many years ago and always loved the loco. I hadn’t heard the above story before though.
Incidentally at the time 30499 was also at the line and was shoved right down the far end of the headshunt at Alresford amongst the bushes still looking exactly as it did in the scrapyard.
The thought of that just made my knees tremble...I remember having a good look, with others, at 30506 in about 1971 in Barry and the consensus was, that with a little work, it would have been possible to steam it out of there.
I hope the last mile of track and ballast was painted green for any locos having to make such a journey under their own steam
The Green Mile as in the film where inmates on death row in an American prison, walk to there demise. The locos would be making there own way to there demise.I'm afraid that you'll have to explain that one … !
Until the very final years of steam loco operation, those withdrawn were normally broken up at the main works rather than sold to outside contractors. They travelled there just like other locos going there for periodic overhaul, unless they were unserviceable (and this happened with locos going for overhaul as well). The outside contractors generally did not have any facility or knowledge for dealing with a loco arriving in working order, such as emptying the boiler or tender, so locos sold to them would need some preparation by rail staff, and then be hauled.
The Green Mile as in the film where inmates on death row in an American prison, walk to there demise. The locos would be making there own way to there demise.