ValleyLines142
Established Member
What's to be embarrassed about - you've got a valid ticket after all?
I know, but it can be annoying, especially when there's a bit of a queue to exit the station.
What's to be embarrassed about - you've got a valid ticket after all?
Lots of totally unacceptable, tortious and even unlawful things are standard practice in the customer facing part of the rail industry. Almost all have a blind eye turned to them for one reason or another.But I don't think you're saying that it's acceptable for people like me who buy such a ticket being treated as potential criminals by railway staff, are you? Because this is what happens, although I have the fortitude to work past it. And it's not really acceptable, I don't think.
me who buy such a ticket being treated as potential criminals by railway staff, are you?
Why is that necessary? Surely the rejection should be two attempted uses in the same direction?
My guess would be the barriers don't (always?) differentiate in and out movements. I have had numerous occasions where I have left a station to use a local shop or such and got out OK but know full well I am not going to get back in again!
It's not that it can't be programmed to differentiate, but that's additional complexity to solve a non-problem in the typical use case.If it’s really the case that a gate with ticket slots / readers on either side of the barrier can’t differentiate as to which is being used, that’s a truly dreadful piece of design
Still, I've never yet actually been unable to get past the barriers with the ticket. Even the Euston barrier staff were polite last September, despite the usual "I've not seen one of these before, what is it?"
Actually, at some stations it isn’t possible due to the limitations of the gate line logic software. If it was just complexity I would have found a way of doing it!It's not that it can't be programmed to differentiate, but that's additional complexity to solve a non-problem in the typical use case.
I meant in the underlying microcode, rather than the end-user's programming. If the TOC's demanded it, the vendors would provide it.Actually, at some stations it isn’t possible due to the limitations of the gate line logic software. If it was just complexity I would have found a way of doing it!
The problem with rovers is that the issuing station is encoded as the origin.
Yes.Even if the issuing station is not within the validity of the rover?
The limitation is more about the space on the magnetic strip. Financially, there is minimal value in changing the coding for such outdated technology. Therefore it will not happen.I meant in the underlying microcode, rather than the end-user's programming. If the TOC's demanded it, the vendors would provide it.
Which goes back to the idea that it's not worth it for the typical use case.The limitation is more about the space on the magnetic strip. Financially, there is minimal value in changing the coding for such outdated technology. Therefore it will not happen.
When I last used a Devon ranger, it opened the barriers at Exeter St David’s, but not Plymouth or Exeter Central.
Even if the issuing station is not within the validity of the rover?
Yes.