• Our booking engine at tickets.railforums.co.uk (powered by TrainSplit) helps support the running of the forum with every ticket purchase! Find out more and ask any questions/give us feedback in this thread!

East Coast Trains Ltd Launch and branding

Status
Not open for further replies.

ModernRailways

Established Member
Joined
21 Apr 2011
Messages
2,050
East Coast Trains Ltd will be launching very soon. The services will be branded 'lumo' and on launch there will be some cheap walk up fares running all the way till December. Extremely low quality is because I've had to remove other information.
 

Attachments

  • lumo logo.jpg
    lumo logo.jpg
    1.8 KB · Views: 786
Sponsor Post - registered members do not see these adverts; click here to register, or click here to log in
R

RailUK Forums

Joined
21 Aug 2021
Messages
213
Location
Aylesbury
East Coast Trains Ltd will be launching very soon. The services will be branded 'lumo' and on launch there will be some cheap walk up fares running all the way till December. Extremely low quality is because I've had to remove other information.
Where is this information from? I can not find anything online other than the trademark registration for "Lumo" that East Coast Trains Limited made? Where are the details of the cheap walk up fares available?
 

ModernRailways

Established Member
Joined
21 Apr 2011
Messages
2,050
Where is this information from? I can not find anything online other than the trademark registration for "Lumo" that East Coast Trains Limited made? Where are the details of the cheap walk up fares available?
This has been passed to me from a colleague who moved over to join them. It's not announced anywhere yet and is meant to be under wraps.
 

adc82140

Established Member
Joined
10 May 2008
Messages
2,933
So far this week we've had "Lumo" and "City Beam". Roll on GB Railways and an end to this nonsense.
 
Joined
21 Aug 2021
Messages
213
Location
Aylesbury
This has been passed to me from a colleague who moved over to join them. It's not announced anywhere yet and is meant to be under wraps.
Ah i see. Personally i would have preferred to if they just called it "East Coast Trains" instead. What is it with so many TOCs coming up with all these ridiculous names during the past few years. It certainly seems to be the latest trend to gives silly meaningless names to trains. Arterio, Aurora, Azuma, Citybeam, Lumo, Paragon, etc.

I would be interested to know how they came up with the name "Lumo" for these services! A quick Google search tells me that "Lumo" is a Video Game and also a major Electricity and Gas supplier in Australia so who knows how they came up with this name!

Any news yet on how the ticketing will operate? Will they be part of the normal ticketing system? Will tickets be available to purchase from Guards onboard trains just like FHT and GC do? Will you be able to buy their tickets from TVMs and Ticket Offices at stations? Or is all this still being decided?
 

800001

Established Member
Joined
24 Oct 2015
Messages
3,576
To my knowledge there tickets are due to go on sale from tomorrow.
 

Ianno87

Veteran Member
Joined
3 May 2015
Messages
15,215
So far this week we've had "Lumo" and "City Beam". Roll on GB Railways and an end to this nonsense.

But GBR branding won't extend to open access?

Yep. Let's hear it for fewer services and more expensive fares, then.

Who thinks these names up?
Lumo or Slomo...

"Lumos" (the spell for light from Harry Potter springs to mind).

It's *almost* as if they're trying to appeal to the general public than a bunch of trainspotters. Crazy.
 

tommy2215

Member
Joined
10 Aug 2017
Messages
341
Very good news for Morpeth who by the start of the December timetable will have gained an extra 16 trains a day.
 

trek

Member
Joined
30 Mar 2013
Messages
168
Any news yet on how the ticketing will operate? Will they be part of the normal ticketing system? Will tickets be available to purchase from Guards onboard trains just like FHT and GC do? Will you be able to buy their tickets from TVMs and Ticket Offices at stations? Or is all this still being decided?

Not sure where to find a source, but I believe the idea the whole way through has been to focus on advance fares, they won't offer any "lumo only" walk up tickets, although "any permitted" will be valid. There's no reason TVMs and Ticket Offices would't offer their fares - they appear to be in BRFares now - KGX-NCL starting at £7.90 with no railcard :o

I suspect anyone on board will be sold a ticket as they won't have a Penalty Fares scheme, but remains to be seen the policy on offering discounted fares on board.
 

Ianno87

Veteran Member
Joined
3 May 2015
Messages
15,215
Not sure where to find a source, but I believe the idea the whole way through has been to focus on advance fares, they won't offer any "lumo only" walk up tickets, although "any permitted" will be valid. There's no reason TVMs and Ticket Offices wiuldn't offer their fares - they appear to be in BRFares now - KGX-NCL starting at £7.90 with no railcard :o

I suspect anyone on board will be sold a ticket as they won't have a Penalty Fares scheme, but remains to be seen the policy on offering discounted fares on board.

I'm guessing the "Advance" tickets will be available up to departure, provided there is still availability.

Not sure where to find a source, but I believe the idea the whole way through has been to focus on advance fares, they won't offer any "lumo only" walk up tickets, although "any permitted" will be valid. There's no reason TVMs and Ticket Offices would't offer their fares - they appear to be in BRFares now - KGX-NCL starting at £7.90 with no railcard :o

I suspect anyone on board will be sold a ticket as they won't have a Penalty Fares scheme, but remains to be seen the policy on offering discounted fares on board.

Even the most expensive single King's Cross-Edinburgh is only £21.90. That's insane.
 

bramling

Veteran Member
Joined
5 Mar 2012
Messages
17,771
Location
Hertfordshire / Teesdale
Yep. Let's hear it for fewer services and more expensive fares, then.



"Lumos" (the spell for light from Harry Potter springs to mind).

It's *almost* as if they're trying to appeal to the general public than a bunch of trainspotters. Crazy.

I don’t know, it sounds more like some kind of toilet cleaner to me.
 

Ianno87

Veteran Member
Joined
3 May 2015
Messages
15,215
I don’t know, it sounds more like some kind of toilet cleaner to me.

If their fares are genuinely as cheap as it appears, they could call themselves Turd on a Stick and it wouldn't make much difference.
 

trek

Member
Joined
30 Mar 2013
Messages
168
Even the most expensive single King's Cross-Edinburgh is only £21.90. That's insane.
I just noticed that. I suspect they may be very low for the launch period. The original pitch was an average fare of £25, I believe, currently everything in is below that!
 

py_megapixel

Established Member
Joined
5 Nov 2018
Messages
6,673
Location
Northern England
I'm surprised they even bothered coming up with a new brand. "Avanti East Coast" would have been fine.

If their fares are genuinely as cheap as it appears, they could call themselves Turd on a Stick and it wouldn't make much difference.
Especially considering it's heavily rumoured that the trains will be more comfortable than the LNER equivalents!! It would be insane for people not to use them if there was a departure at an appropriate time.
 

Ianno87

Veteran Member
Joined
3 May 2015
Messages
15,215
I'm surprised they even bothered coming up with a new brand. "Avanti East Coast" would have been fine.

Thiugh it needs to be clear they are not a "normal" operator, accepting walk up tickets etc. Hence totally different name.
 

bramling

Veteran Member
Joined
5 Mar 2012
Messages
17,771
Location
Hertfordshire / Teesdale
If their fares are genuinely as cheap as it appears, they could call themselves Turd on a Stick and it wouldn't make much difference.

Time will of course tell if such fares can be sustained going forward. Even if they manage to fill every single seat I can’t see that being viable.
 

py_megapixel

Established Member
Joined
5 Nov 2018
Messages
6,673
Location
Northern England
Thiugh it needs to be clear they are not a "normal" operator, accepting walk up tickets etc. Hence totally different name.
That would make sense, though if they are participating in the RDG's ticketing system (which they seem to be, if their fares are in the data) then will they not have to accept 'any permitted' walk up tickets anyway?
 

Sprinter156

Member
Joined
17 Jan 2017
Messages
62
Location
South West Scotland
It certainly seems to be the latest trend to gives silly meaningless names to trains. Arterio, Aurora, Azuma, Citybeam, Lumo, Paragon, etc.
To be fair, Azuma is Japanese for "east" (London North Eastern Railway), and Paragon is most likely based on Hull Paragon interchange (where these units operate). The others do sound random though
 

trek

Member
Joined
30 Mar 2013
Messages
168
That would make sense, though if they are participating in the RDG's ticketing system (which they seem to be, if their fares are in the data) then will they not have to accept 'any permitted' walk up tickets anyway?
They will. But it doesn't mean it makes sense for their promotional material/marketing to fit with the others.

Remember this is an operation to mostly go against airlines, and to a smaller extent against LNER and coaches. They need a brand to get known, and likely very low initial fares. See services like "ouigo" in France with similarly odd names.
 

Mainline421

Member
Joined
7 May 2013
Messages
504
Location
Aberystwyth
Thiugh it needs to be clear they are not a "normal" operator, accepting walk up tickets etc. Hence totally different name.
By all accounts they will accept walk-up tickets. It would be foolish not to participate in ORCATS, even if it makes up a small percentage of their passengers. Although I agree the branding should differentiate the product from the 'full service' offering of Avanti.
 

Ianno87

Veteran Member
Joined
3 May 2015
Messages
15,215
By all accounts they will accept walk-up tickets. It would be foolish not to participate in ORCATS, even if it makes up a small percentage of their passengers. Although I agree the branding should differentiate the product from the 'full service' offering of Avanti.

They may accept them, but not take revenue from them, or something? I thought they couldn't so as not to be primarily abstractive

Edit: Just reviewing the 2016 ECML Track Access Decision letter, I think ECT successfully proved that enough new revenue could be generated from their low cost model (and abstraction from airlines) to be Not Primarily Abstractive from (then) VTEC etc Which suggests they will take some revenue from existing walk up tickets.
 
Last edited:

trek

Member
Joined
30 Mar 2013
Messages
168
They may accept them, but not take revenue from them, or something? I thought they couldn't so as not to be primarily abstractive

Previous indications have shown they will take some ORCATS revenue from them but given their very limited service (and longer journey time) compared to the incumbent operator LNER they will take a relatively small amount, and still passed a "not primarily abstractive" test overall. GC, XC, HT, TPE etc all get something from a KGX-EDB ticket due to the potential for a customer to use those trains and change or otherwise break journey

What they did do to reduce their ORCATS raid is not include any 1st class, so they won't get any revenue from those tickets. That's always been an imblanced one as GC get 1st class ORCATS revenue on their services despite the significantly worse on board offering than LNER.

Just noticed advance fares appear to have been put in to offer a PRIV discount so start at £1.95 KGX-NCL. I suspect an error but I can dream!
 

Hadders

Veteran Member
Associate Staff
Senior Fares Advisor
Joined
27 Apr 2011
Messages
13,189
I wonder if they will be reservation compulsory?
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Top