• Our new ticketing site is now live! Using either this or the original site (both powered by TrainSplit) helps support the running of the forum with every ticket purchase! Find out more and ask any questions/give us feedback in this thread!

East Coast Trains: What are your hopes, fears and predictions?

Status
Not open for further replies.

southern442

Established Member
Joined
20 May 2013
Messages
2,207
Location
Surrey
My only concern capacity-wise was using 5-car rather than 9-car units, I know that might be hard to justify with regards to revenue extraction but when it comes to busy routes such as the ECML principles like these seem to work against capacity efficiency.
 
Sponsor Post - registered members do not see these adverts; click here to register, or click here to log in
R

RailUK Forums

Halish Railway

Established Member
Joined
26 Apr 2017
Messages
1,818
Location
West Yorkshire / Birmingham
My only concern capacity-wise was using 5-car rather than 9-car units, I know that might be hard to justify with regards to revenue extraction but when it comes to busy routes such as the ECML principles like these seem to work against capacity efficiency.
They’re standard class throughout, thus they do not experience the problem of poor usage of space caused by having 2+1 seating and a kitchen that takes up half of the DPTF. If the 803s don’t have a buffet then that would spare up even more room to put 2+2 seating.
 

DB

Guest
Joined
18 Nov 2009
Messages
5,036
They’re standard class throughout, thus they do not experience the problem of poor usage of space caused by having 2+1 seating and a kitchen that takes up half of the DPTF. If the 803s don’t have a buffet then that would spare up even more room to put 2+2 seating.

I suspect they won't have a buffet - none of the 80x do so far apart from the LNER ones.

That said, if they have a catering trolley they will need somewhere for that to be kept, filled with water, etc - but that doesn't require a large space and could be in one of the crumple zone areas.
 

Domh245

Established Member
Joined
6 Apr 2013
Messages
8,425
Location
nowhere
The capacity of the 803s is 400, going by Beacon Rail's page. An all-standard TPE/HT 802 would come in at 376, so unless the passenger they give on the page has generous tolerances, they need to fit an extra 24 seats in. Replacing all luggage racks with a pair of seats would get you to 396
 

Journeyman

Established Member
Joined
16 Apr 2014
Messages
6,295
The capacity of the 803s is 400, going by Beacon Rail's page. An all-standard TPE/HT 802 would come in at 376, so unless the passenger they give on the page has generous tolerances, they need to fit an extra 24 seats in. Replacing all luggage racks with a pair of seats would get you to 396
Much smaller galley?
 

Glenn1969

Established Member
Joined
22 Jan 2019
Messages
1,983
Location
Halifax, Yorks
Are they still going for October even though no one has any idea when long distance travel will be allowed for non essential purposes?
 

Carlisle

Established Member
Joined
26 Aug 2012
Messages
4,231
Are they still going for October even though no one has any idea when long distance travel will be allowed for non essential purposes?
If it’s not allowed by October, something not currently foreseen will have gone seriously wrong with the vaccination program
 
Last edited:

Bald Rick

Veteran Member
Joined
28 Sep 2010
Messages
30,346
Are they still going for October even though no one has any idea when long distance travel will be allowed for non essential purposes?

ECTL don’t have to decide when to activate the service for several months yet.
 

paul1609

Established Member
Joined
28 Jan 2006
Messages
7,792
Location
Wittersham Kent
The capacity of the 803s is 400, going by Beacon Rail's page. An all-standard TPE/HT 802 would come in at 376, so unless the passenger they give on the page has generous tolerances, they need to fit an extra 24 seats in. Replacing all luggage racks with a pair of seats would get you to 396
Given that 80% of their market is going to be new to rail, from coach and air, airline seating would be the 80%'s expectation, take the tables out of the trailer coaches, shouldn't be a problem fitting another 12 seats taking the 3 trailers to 100 seats- 50 in each of the end cars, job done.
 

Bald Rick

Veteran Member
Joined
28 Sep 2010
Messages
30,346
Is there actually space for them in the timetable before the May 22 recast?

Yes - they have access rights remember, so space has to be found (making all reasonable efforts). Whether it is ‘good’ space or not remains to be seen!
 

swt_passenger

Veteran Member
Joined
7 Apr 2010
Messages
32,200
Yes - they have access rights remember, so space has to be found (making all reasonable efforts). Whether it is ‘good’ space or not remains to be seen!
What happens if they can be theoretically pathed in the timetable, but there’s no electrical power available on a significant part of the route?
 

Bald Rick

Veteran Member
Joined
28 Sep 2010
Messages
30,346
What happens if they can be theoretically pathed in the timetable, but there’s no electrical power available on a significant part of the route?

Then Part D of the Network Code is applied. Operators’ slots with firm rights (like ECTL) have primacy over those that have contingent rights (like, ahem, ‘others’)
 

Class 170101

Established Member
Joined
1 Mar 2014
Messages
8,098
Yes - they have access rights remember, so space has to be found (making all reasonable efforts). Whether it is ‘good’ space or not remains to be seen!
In that case then is it possible that should May 22 be delayed but with East Coast Trains on the graph not withstanding swt_passenger's point
What happens if they can be theoretically pathed in the timetable, but there’s no electrical power available on a significant part of the route?
that Middlesbrough could still happen as extension of existing York service, and Harrogate, Huddersfield, Skipton and Bradford Forster Square as extension of the existing Leeds services until the May 22 proposed timetable issues can be resolved either for May 22 or later if extra planning time is needed?
 

Bald Rick

Veteran Member
Joined
28 Sep 2010
Messages
30,346
In that case then is it possible that should May 22 be delayed but with East Coast Trains on the graph not withstanding swt_passenger's point

that Middlesbrough could still happen as extension of existing York service, and Harrogate, Huddersfield, Skipton and Bradford Forster Square as extension of the existing Leeds services until the May 22 proposed timetable issues can be resolved either for May 22 or later if extra planning time is needed?

That’s a very different question. That depends what LNERs funder wants to do.
 

takno

Established Member
Joined
9 Jul 2016
Messages
5,746
Given that 80% of their market is going to be new to rail, from coach and air, airline seating would be the 80%'s expectation, take the tables out of the trailer coaches, shouldn't be a problem fitting another 12 seats taking the 3 trailers to 100 seats- 50 in each of the end cars, job done.
I wouldn't say that the passengers themselves will be new to rail. The individual journeys will have been captured from air travel, but most of the passengers will have done it by train before. The seats will certainly be more comfortable than plane seats whatever the configuration, but the passengers will be in them for 3 times as long, and they may well put a premium on being able to spend that time around a table.
 

fgwrich

Established Member
Joined
15 Apr 2009
Messages
9,514
Location
Hampshire
So unlikely to get much summer domestiv traffic then (unless we have an 'Indian' Summer I suppose).
You have to remember that Edinburgh is also a very tourist driven city, and it's Festive Season (Christmas Market + Hogmanay) is incredibly popular. If First get this aspect right (publicity etc) then I think they'll do well to compete with NX / Megabus / LNER etc.
 

paul1609

Established Member
Joined
28 Jan 2006
Messages
7,792
Location
Wittersham Kent
I wouldn't say that the passengers themselves will be new to rail. The individual journeys will have been captured from air travel, but most of the passengers will have done it by train before. The seats will certainly be more comfortable than plane seats whatever the configuration, but the passengers will be in them for 3 times as long, and they may well put a premium on being able to spend that time around a table.
Personally if the average fare is going to be £25 for London to Edinburgh. I'd be happy with an airline seat. East Coast could leave the tables in the end coaches and charge a premium for a table seat much like Easyjet do with upfront seats on the London- Edinburgh Flights.
 

takno

Established Member
Joined
9 Jul 2016
Messages
5,746
Personally if the average fare is going to be £25 for London to Edinburgh. I'd be happy with an airline seat. East Coast could leave the tables in the end coaches and charge a premium for a table seat much like Easyjet do with upfront seats on the London- Edinburgh Flights.
My thinking is that they would almost always be able to fill the tables at 40 quid, and still almost always beating the air fare and winning on comfort. If you can get the same revenue from fewer cattle, why would you make life difficult for yourself?
 

Bletchleyite

Veteran Member
Joined
20 Oct 2014
Messages
101,242
Location
"Marston Vale mafia"
Personally if the average fare is going to be £25 for London to Edinburgh. I'd be happy with an airline seat. East Coast could leave the tables in the end coaches and charge a premium for a table seat much like Easyjet do with upfront seats on the London- Edinburgh Flights.

Good point, I suppose that while easyJet doesn't have distinct marked-out classes of service it does still have multiple classes in terms of exactly what seat you select (or accept at random), and as this is meant to be an airline style concept there's no reason that concept couldn't apply.

I wonder might they also offer something like I recall one of the Scandinavian open access operators do, i.e. allowing a lone traveller to pay extra (but not quite the full fare extra) to keep the next seat empty, perhaps only offered on quieter trains where you'd have spare seats anyway so you're just reshuffling which seats are "spare"? At the right price I'd consider that, as it provides much of the benefit of the "1 side" that constitutes most of the selling point of First Class to me. And of course is made possible by compulsory reservation, as without it there's little to stop a walk-up passenger plonking themselves there.
 

paul1609

Established Member
Joined
28 Jan 2006
Messages
7,792
Location
Wittersham Kent
My thinking is that they would almost always be able to fill the tables at 40 quid, and still almost always beating the air fare and winning on comfort. If you can get the same revenue from fewer cattle, why would you make life difficult for yourself?
Personally I wouldn't pay any premium for a table seat( they never have enough leg room for me) and at £40 the service is beginning to look unattractive when compared to the overnight megabus (normally pay under £20), split fares via Crewe or even railcard discounted Avanti fares. If you are faced with premium fares to a Central London Termius, Easyjets lower tiers of fares from Gatwick will still be attractive.
 

Ianno87

Veteran Member
Joined
3 May 2015
Messages
15,215
Personally if the average fare is going to be £25 for London to Edinburgh. I'd be happy with an airline seat. East Coast could leave the tables in the end coaches and charge a premium for a table seat much like Easyjet do with upfront seats on the London- Edinburgh Flights.

That's kind of how Ouigo works in France - pay slightly more for niceties like a plug socket (though for 803s I'd expect sockets at all seats as standard).

Personally I wouldn't pay any premium for a table seat( they never have enough leg room for me) and at £40 the service is beginning to look unattractive when compared to the overnight megabus (normally pay under £20), split fares via Crewe or even railcard discounted Avanti fares. If you are faced with premium fares to a Central London Termius, Easyjets lower tiers of fares from Gatwick will still be attractive.

Laptop users may gladly pay a premium, for example (though 80x airline seats tend to be very good with laptops).
 

Bletchleyite

Veteran Member
Joined
20 Oct 2014
Messages
101,242
Location
"Marston Vale mafia"
Personally I wouldn't pay any premium for a table seat( they never have enough leg room for me) and at £40 the service is beginning to look unattractive when compared to the overnight megabus (normally pay under £20), split fares via Crewe or even railcard discounted Avanti fares. If you are faced with premium fares to a Central London Termius, Easyjets lower tiers of fares from Gatwick will still be attractive.

I'm not sure that is the main thing they're competing against, partly because there's only one of those (plus a NatEx doing the same) so you're only talking a maximum of about 100 passengers per day or so, and because passengers who are willing to take an overnight coach journey are as far budget as you can get without not bothering at all (an overnight seated coach really is the lowest "class" of travel conceivable short of kipping in the back of a bin lorry), so they will likely not manage to succeed in competing with that on price.

Of course, what you do show there is why that sort of supplement works - see speedy boarding, extra legroom seats etc - because some people think it's not worth the money and so benefit from a cheaper fare, but others think it's great and willingly hand over more, so you get both markets. I'd not like to see stuff that makes travel deliberately worse e.g. luggage restrictions or sham "check-ins" like the French did with Ouigo, but I equally can see the point in seating-related upgrades even in a single-class cabin, and indeed I usually take advantage of them to get an extra legroom window seat because that's valuable to me.

Laptop users may gladly pay a premium, for example (though 80x airline seats tend to be very good with laptops).

Yep, there are many downsides of the "good old" Sophia, but also upsides, one notable one being, as you say, that the tray table is a good size and has the pull-out laptop support, which when coupled with the very upright seat back means laptop use is well-accommodated.
 

Journeyman

Established Member
Joined
16 Apr 2014
Messages
6,295
Personally if the average fare is going to be £25 for London to Edinburgh. I'd be happy with an airline seat. East Coast could leave the tables in the end coaches and charge a premium for a table seat much like Easyjet do with upfront seats on the London- Edinburgh Flights.
I'd actually pay a premium for an airline seat over a table!
 

Bletchleyite

Veteran Member
Joined
20 Oct 2014
Messages
101,242
Location
"Marston Vale mafia"
I'd actually pay a premium for an airline seat over a table!

They may of course offer exactly that, namely paid seat selection otherwise you get something random. Though I suspect you're likely to be in luck as I'd figure that tables would cost more, as might any non-priority extra legroom seats.

If I were them I'd keep back the bad seats (non-window-aligned or the narrow ones against the door pockets if they're having those) to allocate "randomly", as fewer people will pay for those, and a high risk of getting one might encourage more people to pay for selection.
 

Journeyman

Established Member
Joined
16 Apr 2014
Messages
6,295
They may of course offer exactly that, namely paid seat selection otherwise you get something random. Though I suspect you're likely to be in luck as I'd figure that tables would cost more, as might any non-priority extra legroom seats.
Of course. I prefer airline seats as I usually travel alone, and would far rather not spend the journey sat opposite a stranger (or two) for four hours.
 

py_megapixel

Established Member
Joined
5 Nov 2018
Messages
6,848
Location
Northern England
They may of course offer exactly that, namely paid seat selection otherwise you get something random
Of course. I prefer airline seats as I usually travel alone, and would far rather not spend the journey sat opposite a stranger (or two) for four hours.
Is it likely that they will actually enforce seat reservations then? (e.g. if your ticket says seat B34 you MUST sit in B34)?
Currently there aren't any TOCs which - in normal times, anyway - will insist you move if you have a reservation for a seat other than the one you have taken.
 

Ianno87

Veteran Member
Joined
3 May 2015
Messages
15,215
Is it likely that they will actually enforce seat reservations then? (e.g. if your ticket says seat B34 you MUST sit in B34)?
Currently there aren't any TOCs which - in normal times, anyway - will insist you move if you have a reservation for a seat other than the one you have taken.

If East Coast Trains are planning on having a relatively high loading factor, then you'll be de-facto restricted to your reserved seat by virtue of all the others being allocated anyway.
 

Bletchleyite

Veteran Member
Joined
20 Oct 2014
Messages
101,242
Location
"Marston Vale mafia"
Is it likely that they will actually enforce seat reservations then? (e.g. if your ticket says seat B34 you MUST sit in B34)?
Currently there aren't any TOCs which - in normal times, anyway - will insist you move if you have a reservation for a seat other than the one you have taken.

If they choose to have an airline style policy of charging for allocation based on the merits of particular seats, yes, I'd imagine so. The whole thing is to be modelled on a low-cost airline.

If East Coast Trains are planning on having a relatively high loading factor, then you'll be de-facto restricted to your reserved seat by virtue of all the others being allocated anyway.

That too.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Top