• Our new ticketing site is now live! Using either this or the original site (both powered by TrainSplit) helps support the running of the forum with every ticket purchase! Find out more and ask any questions/give us feedback in this thread!

ECML disruption, 1/5/21

Status
Not open for further replies.

Ceat0908

Member
Joined
10 Jul 2020
Messages
103
Appears to be significant disruption, according to LNER because of signalling issues. Any idea what is going on specifically. been delayed plenty of times by sig issues, but 220 mins delay on one service is a lot!
 
Sponsor Post - registered members do not see these adverts; click here to register, or click here to log in
R

RailUK Forums

nlogax

Established Member
Joined
29 May 2011
Messages
5,517
Location
Mostly Glasgow-ish. Mostly.
NR had to fix some signalling in the Dunbar to Berwick area. It's blitzed the reservations-only policy for services during the first half of the day. The s/b Azuma I'm on right now is very busy as part of today's free-for-all.
 

Taunton

Established Member
Joined
1 Aug 2013
Messages
10,580
It's blitzed the reservations-only policy for services during the first half of the day. The s/b Azuma I'm on right now is very busy as part of today's free-for-all.
So when it's convenient for the railway they can just say "get any train you like". But not when it's convenient for the passengers.
 

Ianno87

Veteran Member
Joined
3 May 2015
Messages
15,215
So when it's convenient for the railway they can just say "get any train you like". But not when it's convenient for the passengers.

In the other discussion a common question is "what happens during disruption?".

Well, here's your answer... the system copes.
 

nlogax

Established Member
Joined
29 May 2011
Messages
5,517
Location
Mostly Glasgow-ish. Mostly.
In the other discussion a common question is "what happens during disruption?".

Well, here's your answer... the system copes.
Indeed it does. LNER doing well today considering they've dealing with high loadings while the WCML is mostly out of action at the same time as these signalling woes.

Had to bite my tongue when a nearby passenger in this crowded carriage asked the train manager 'but what about social distancing?'. The TM was far more tactful in his response than I would have been.
 

Ianno87

Veteran Member
Joined
3 May 2015
Messages
15,215
Had to bite my tongue when a nearby passenger in this crowded carriage asked the train manager 'but what about social distancing?'. The TM was far more tactful in his response than I would have been.

"You are very welcome to leave the train and travel later on or tomorrow if you do not feel comfortable"

(I presume the guy just wanted other people to get off...)
 

nlogax

Established Member
Joined
29 May 2011
Messages
5,517
Location
Mostly Glasgow-ish. Mostly.
"You are very welcome to leave the train and travel later on or tomorrow if you do not feel comfortable"

(I presume the guy just wanted other people to get off...)
I wanted to suggest they vacate their seat and find some comfy overhead space in the luggage racks..
 

noddingdonkey

Member
Joined
2 Nov 2012
Messages
797
Had to bite my tongue when a nearby passenger in this crowded carriage asked the train manager 'but what about social distancing?'. The TM was far more tactful in his response than I would have been.

OK, I'll bite. Why is it inappropriate to think that a TOC would be expected to have risk assessed the maximum permissable occupancy of each type of train carriage and to have a queuing system in place should services be over subscribed?

In the current situation, don't covid restrictions trump a little inconvenience for people having to wait for the next train?
 

221129

Established Member
Joined
21 Mar 2011
Messages
6,520
Location
Sunny Scotland
In the current situation, don't covid restrictions trump a little inconvenience for people having to wait for the next train?
Put simply, no. Social distancing isn't a legal requirement and maximum capacity is a guideline not a hard rule. In disruption like today's the aim is to get people to where they need to be. No one is forcing people to get on trains.
 

43096

On Moderation
Joined
23 Nov 2015
Messages
15,885
In the other discussion a common question is "what happens during disruption?".

Well, here's your answer... the system copes.
What are loadings like compared to pre-Covid though? Rather less, which inherently means it is easier to cope. If everything was wedged (as was the case on Sundays) they’d be stuffed.
 

Ianno87

Veteran Member
Joined
3 May 2015
Messages
15,215
What are loadings like compared to pre-Covid though? Rather less, which inherently means it is easier to cope. If everything was wedged (as was the case on Sundays) they’d be stuffed.

Even with every seat reserved, it at least means management of the number of people to handle during disruption, so you're not dealing with trains that are *already* full and standing before disruption is thrown into the mix. I fact, you will know exactly the number of passengers reserved and can plan accordingly (including numbers joining at intermediate stations, amount of road transport required etc).

Isn’t the latter the whole philosophy behind compulsory reservations?

It seems all reservations were cancelled, so the guy may or may not have been on his booked train.
 

nlogax

Established Member
Joined
29 May 2011
Messages
5,517
Location
Mostly Glasgow-ish. Mostly.
Isn’t the latter the whole philosophy behind compulsory reservations?
LNER did try to implement a vague degree of social distancing but in the context of 200+ minute delays and being the only direct Scotland to London route today I can see why reservations were binned.
 

Ianno87

Veteran Member
Joined
3 May 2015
Messages
15,215
LNER did try to implement a vague degree of social distancing but in the context of 200+ minute delays and being the only direct Scotland to London route today I can see why reservations were binned.

If SD had tried to be enforced, you'd just be in part shoving the problem onto the station instead.
 

JonathanH

Veteran Member
Joined
29 May 2011
Messages
19,949
It still demonstrates why the government's official advice is that people should try to minimise travel as much as possible, to leave room for those who have to travel, particularly if there is disruption.
 

route101

Established Member
Joined
16 May 2010
Messages
10,867
I got caught up in this. Booked on the 0900 LNER from Edinburgh to Newcastle. Turned up at P5 and a member of staff said to board the the delayed 0830 on P6. Got told to board coach c, no reservations coach. (Not sure how one coach would take a 9 car 801)

The 801 used for the 0900 departure formed the 0930 departure, that was also sat with a train load of passengers and was full to capacity according to the guard.

Still no sign of our departure, and the 0930 next to us eventually departed at 1045. A few people bailed from our train, I decided to give it another 15 mins as bit pointless going to Newcastle for a few hours now. Another 801 was sat on P4 with a load of passengers going nowhere. At 1130 the guard the said its unlikely we will depart until 1pm at least. I thought screw it and jumped off. Went to Gala instead.

The 0830 didn't depart until 1246 from looking at RTT.
 

greyman42

Established Member
Joined
14 Aug 2017
Messages
5,129
It still demonstrates why the government's official advice is that people should try to minimise travel as much as possible, to leave room for those who have to travel, particularly if there is disruption.
I don't see any good reason to minimise travel. The government should be encouraging it.
 

bramling

Veteran Member
Joined
5 Mar 2012
Messages
18,162
Location
Hertfordshire / Teesdale
I don't see any good reason to minimise travel. The government should be encouraging it.

Someone needs to have the backbone to decide one way or another if social distancing is necessary. If it is then minimise travel is appropriate, if not then it isn’t. As usual we have the muddled mess, the same muddled mess that’s given is a high death toll *and* high economic and societal damage. We seem to get the worst of all worlds.
 

greyman42

Established Member
Joined
14 Aug 2017
Messages
5,129
Someone needs to have the backbone to decide one way or another if social distancing is necessary. If it is then minimise travel is appropriate, if not then it isn’t. As usual we have the muddled mess, the same muddled mess that’s given is a high death toll *and* high economic and societal damage. We seem to get the worst of all worlds.
I think that the public have decided that it is not, which usually results in the government dropping it to save face. An example of this was the lifting of the ban, which nobody took any notice of, on meeting your friends on a park bench.
 
Last edited:

bramling

Veteran Member
Joined
5 Mar 2012
Messages
18,162
Location
Hertfordshire / Teesdale
I think that the public have decided that it is not which usually results in the government dropping it to save face. An example of this was the lifting of the ban, which nobody took any notice of, on meeting your friends on a park bench.

I agree entirely, it's farcical. I'm just sick of the fact that we still have some pretty draconian restrictions (an extreme example being limits on numbers at funerals) on the basis that social distancing remains so vitally important, yet on the other hand when it suits packed trains are perfectly fine. If it didn't matter so much it would be funny, however the whole thing is messing with people's wellbeing and livelihoods.
 
Joined
29 Nov 2018
Messages
652
If SD had tried to be enforced, you'd just be in part shoving the problem onto the station instead.
Waverley didn't seem overly busy yesterday. I was there from about 1 until 3pm (northbound woes in my case).
Spent a while in Caffe Nero at platform 2 & 19 - a few people milling around but not to a worrying degree.
Quite a big station though. Maybe Newcastle wouldn't fare so well.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Top