• Our booking engine at tickets.railforums.co.uk (powered by TrainSplit) helps support the running of the forum with every ticket purchase! Find out more and ask any questions/give us feedback in this thread!

England's new three-tier lockdown system

Status
Not open for further replies.
Sponsor Post - registered members do not see these adverts; click here to register, or click here to log in
R

RailUK Forums

radamfi

Established Member
Joined
29 Oct 2009
Messages
9,267
I'd rather stay in the UK TBH. It's just that I think they should pick whether they want to be independent or a full part of the union and stick with it.

But you might be able to get back into the EU after independence. Or are you assuming that the UK will re-join anyway?
 

Yew

Established Member
Joined
12 Mar 2011
Messages
6,549
Location
UK
Apparently Manchester are going into T3.

Jonathan Van Tam also has the cool nickname of "Jay Vee Tee"
 

Ianno87

Veteran Member
Joined
3 May 2015
Messages
15,215
Jonathan Van Tam also has the cool nickname of "Jay Vee Tee"

Properly cringey when Boris says it....

A bit irritated there are public questions asking if a national lockdown would be appropriate, when the slides presented clearly show that infection rates are not a national problem.
 

Darandio

Established Member
Joined
24 Feb 2007
Messages
10,678
Location
Redcar
Just prolonging the agony then. If T3 comes, say, at the weekend, what do they do if the cases and hospital admissions falls significantly before then?

Pretend it hasn't happened.

It's announced they are going tier 3 in Greater Manchester from Friday, it's only 9 days after Liverpool even though they wanted them both at the same time. What a load of bollocks.
 

Ianno87

Veteran Member
Joined
3 May 2015
Messages
15,215
"JVT" (As he's now apparently known) seems a bit obsessed by care homes, with a public question who has only been able to see her mother with dementia once since March.

My Dad was only in a care home for 15 months before passing away; I can't imagine losing 7 months (and likely more) of this of opportunity to see him. Visitors are probably one of the few 'quality of life' metrics that actually matter for care home residents.
 

Ianno87

Veteran Member
Joined
3 May 2015
Messages
15,215
Properly cringey when Boris says it....

A bit irritated there are public questions asking if a national lockdown would be appropriate, when the slides presented clearly show that infection rates are not a national problem.

At least "JVT" seems to recognise that a national lockdown to is unlikely be effective in a national sense as difficult to justify in many areas with low rates. Thankfully.
 

Howardh

Established Member
Joined
17 May 2011
Messages
8,155
Judging by social media, to put it politely, we're not over-enthusiastic about Johnson's statement.
 

packermac

Member
Joined
16 Sep 2019
Messages
543
Location
Swanage
This story highlights just how ridiculous this has all become


One lady comments that she will not see her granddaughter, even though they live on opposite sides of the same street, their homes are in different Tiers.

There’s no way I would comply in that situation
This happens everywhere though around the world wherever there is a boundary or border. Someone has to be the ones on it. I seemed to remember in the first wave the BBC reported on a supermarket that sat across the Dutch/Belgium border (it runs through the store) and hence had at that time different rules depending on which side of the border (i.e. which country) you were from.
No different to many European borders where there used to be a border post in what was basically a residential street before free movement removed the need.
 

Darandio

Established Member
Joined
24 Feb 2007
Messages
10,678
Location
Redcar
I had to laugh at this line:

Boris Johnson says he wanted a deal but had to take action because of the urgency of the situation.

So urgent that they spent a week arguing about money.
 

STINT47

Member
Joined
16 Aug 2020
Messages
607
Location
Nottingham
To say people are not happy with the situation in Manchester after these announcements is an understatement.

Will be interesting to see levels of compliance and if this leads to civil unrest. The Kaiser Chiefs I predict a riot is going round in my head right now.
 

SteveM70

Established Member
Joined
11 Jul 2018
Messages
3,856
What an utter sh*tshow of a press conference

Johnson appears to be penalising the people of Manchester because Burnham stood up to him.

And Cummings appears to have decided the medics need to be shown as “personalities” as Van-Tam was referred to excruciatingly as JVT at every opportunity
 

Darandio

Established Member
Joined
24 Feb 2007
Messages
10,678
Location
Redcar
What an utter sh*tshow of a press conference

Johnson appears to be penalising the people of Manchester because Burnham stood up to him.

How exactly? They were destined for tier 3 anyway, it was even acknowledged by the likes of Burnham that they had to go that way.

Arguing over money for a week when an apparent 'urgent' crisis needed dealing with makes them both look incredibly stupid as far as i'm concerned.
 

DB

Guest
Joined
18 Nov 2009
Messages
5,036
This happens everywhere though around the world wherever there is a boundary or border. Someone has to be the ones on it. I seemed to remember in the first wave the BBC reported on a supermarket that sat across the Dutch/Belgium border (it runs through the store) and hence had at that time different rules depending on which side of the border (i.e. which country) you were from.
No different to many European borders where there used to be a border post in what was basically a residential street before free movement removed the need.

Isn't North Yorkshire (England's largest county by area) counted as one entity? So if there is an increase in cases in Scarborough or Whitby that could lead to restrictions in Skipton, Settle and Hawes? Not very logicial.
 

Ianno87

Veteran Member
Joined
3 May 2015
Messages
15,215
Isn't North Yorkshire (England's largest county by area) counted as one entity? So if there is an increase in cases in Scarborough or Whitby that could lead to restrictions in Skipton, Settle and Hawes? Not very logicial.

Reality is that a local outbreak in one place wouldn't register on the averaged out figures for the whole area.
 

DB

Guest
Joined
18 Nov 2009
Messages
5,036
Reality is that a local outbreak in one place wouldn't register on the averaged out figures for the whole area.

Possibly not - but the area is mostly so sparsely populated that a concentration in one of the larger towns (there are only really two - Harrogate and Scarborough) could have an impact.
 

NorthOxonian

Established Member
Associate Staff
Buses & Coaches
Joined
5 Jul 2018
Messages
1,486
Location
Oxford/Newcastle
Isn't North Yorkshire (England's largest county by area) counted as one entity? So if there is an increase in cases in Scarborough or Whitby that could lead to restrictions in Skipton, Settle and Hawes? Not very logicial.

I believe restrictions are decided at a district level. Barrow has Tier 2 but Carlisle is still Tier 1 despite them being in the same county, likewise for Elmbridge vs Guildford or Coventry vs Birmingham. Granted, in North Yorkshire some of the districts are pretty huge (Hambleton might be the worst - if the York spike spread to Easingwold, why should Stokesley/Northallerton be put into measures), but in exceptional circumstances districts can be split too (such as the High Peak).
 

packermac

Member
Joined
16 Sep 2019
Messages
543
Location
Swanage
How exactly? They were destined for tier 3 anyway, it was even acknowledged by the likes of Burnham that they had to go that way.

Arguing over money for a week when an apparent 'urgent' crisis needed dealing with makes them both look incredibly stupid as far as i'm concerned.
Exactly if I was a newspaper editor I would already have the headline written for 4 or 5 weeks time "Burnham killed my (insert applicable relative)
 

Darandio

Established Member
Joined
24 Feb 2007
Messages
10,678
Location
Redcar
Exactly if I was a newspaper editor I would already have the headline written for 4 or 5 weeks time "Burnham killed my (insert applicable relative)

Well I wouldn't quite go that far!

I understand the need to try and secure adequate funding for the people you represent. What I don't agree with is using it as leverage to delay measures until you get what you want, especially if the need is so urgent and much of the rhetoric is about taking swift action to save lives. Now they're calling Burnham #KingoftheNorth on social media, it baffles me.
 

yorksrob

Veteran Member
Joined
6 Aug 2009
Messages
38,938
Location
Yorks
Exactly if I was a newspaper editor I would already have the headline written for 4 or 5 weeks time "Burnham killed my (insert applicable relative)

If they were intent on peddling the fallacy that the tier three restrictions would actually have an effect.
 

DJH1971

Established Member
Joined
10 Jun 2012
Messages
1,543
Location
St Helens, Merseyside
The advice does seem to be a bit vague, especially regarding non-essential travel from and very high risk area and vice-versa.

The official guidance on Gov.UK for travel to and from a very high risk area states 'you should try to avoid travelling outside the very high alert level area you are in or entering a very high alert level area, other than for things like work, education or youth services, to meet caring responsibilities or if you are travelling through as part of a longer journey'. Basically whilst it is advising you not to take non-essential travel, it is also implying that it is not illegal to do so.
 

kristiang85

Established Member
Joined
23 Jan 2018
Messages
2,655
This happens everywhere though around the world wherever there is a boundary or border. Someone has to be the ones on it. I seemed to remember in the first wave the BBC reported on a supermarket that sat across the Dutch/Belgium border (it runs through the store) and hence had at that time different rules depending on which side of the border (i.e. which country) you were from.
No different to many European borders where there used to be a border post in what was basically a residential street before free movement removed the need.

Ah that would be one of my favourite geo-political anomalies in Europe - Baarle Hertog. Give it a search on Google Maps; the borders are crazy indeed. The definition of your jurisdiction (whether Belgium or Netherlands) is based on which side of the border your front door is, so over the decades various houses/businesses on the lines have changed their front doors around depending on which tax regime was friendlier.

Quite how it worked in COVID times (e.g. the Netherlands has been a lot more lax than Belgium), it would be interesting to know.
 

Peter Sarf

Established Member
Joined
12 Oct 2010
Messages
5,673
Location
Croydon
Well I wouldn't quite go that far!

I understand the need to try and secure adequate funding for the people you represent. What I don't agree with is using it as leverage to delay measures until you get what you want, especially if the need is so urgent and much of the rhetoric is about taking swift action to save lives. Now they're calling Burnham #KingoftheNorth on social media, it baffles me.

I wonder if the cost of the delay will turn out to be more than the £5m they were squabbling over.
 

Chester1

Established Member
Joined
25 Aug 2014
Messages
3,995
I wonder if the cost of the delay will turn out to be more than the £5m they were squabbling over.

It bought a week and a half extra for Mancs to see friends and family and for hospitality businesses to make some money.
 

HSTEd

Veteran Member
Joined
14 Jul 2011
Messages
16,704
I understand the need to try and secure adequate funding for the people you represent. What I don't agree with is using it as leverage to delay measures until you get what you want, especially if the need is so urgent and much of the rhetoric is about taking swift action to save lives. Now they're calling Burnham #KingoftheNorth on social media, it baffles me.

Because people are finally starting to realise that lockdown without the cushy 80% is a nightmare?

I wonder if the cost of the delay will turn out to be more than the £5m they were squabbling over.

Well the extra week's delay, with the marginally higher R will get us a little bit closer to the inevitable exit point to this crisis.
 

DustyBin

Established Member
Joined
20 Sep 2020
Messages
3,623
Location
First Class
To say people are not happy with the situation in Manchester after these announcements is an understatement.

Will be interesting to see levels of compliance and if this leads to civil unrest. The Kaiser Chiefs I predict a riot is going round in my head right now.

There have been a few things discussed on here that may lead to civil unrest, but nobody could have foreseen this. I’m not sure about rioting but I can very well imagine people in Greater Manchester saying stuff the restrictions as a result of their local leaders openly challenging it. It’s an interesting situation!
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Top