• Our booking engine at tickets.railforums.co.uk (powered by TrainSplit) helps support the running of the forum with every ticket purchase! Find out more and ask any questions/give us feedback in this thread!

Entire Merseyrail fleet to be replaced

Status
Not open for further replies.

507 001

Established Member
Joined
3 Dec 2008
Messages
1,868
Location
Huyton
I've never seen the local scallies use Northern, or other TOC's that operate through Manchester/Warrington, a lot of the time when I'm using Merseyrail I see groups on them on the train causing trouble, being aggressive and abusive towards other passengers, and fare evading. All they seem to want to do is cause trouble.

No doubt in my mind that toilets would get graffiti'd all over constantly. The walls of most Merseyrail trains have been defaced; obnoxious remarks, and peoples names engraved with knives and keys.

Although toilets may be a nice addition to Merseyrail those travelling slightly longer journeys, i.e. if someone was travelling from Southport to Chester, or disabled passengers, I feel these people would ruin it for everyone else. I didn't come here to argue, by the way. Just stating my opinion. Just find it a shame that kids like to create an unpleasant and depressing atmosphere.

edit; I'm also hoping that they revert to the old seating plans, but also have convenient disabled access for those that need it. Old plans carried slightly more passengers.. which is important on a network with an extremely high volume of passengers at peak hours. Toilets would also reduce this capacity.

*I've been using merseyrail frequently for the best part of 20 years, I can honestly say I very in-frequently see anybody being aggressive or abusive to anybody, and anybody who is causing a nuisance is pretty quickly dealt with by enforcement teams.
*Toilets would be useless, I agree, however a return to a 3+2 seating layout would be just as useless as nobody used the middle seats when they were fitted.

Whether you came here to argue or not, your use of stereotypes is rather annoying to a born and bred scouser.

To change tack for a moment, is there any real requirement to have the same stock on both the Southport and Birkenhead lines?

Would one type of train be more suited to one than the other?

Tried that one before with the 502's and 503's. Its also interesting to note that many people forget that until the very early 90's the 508's and 507's were used independently (508's wirral lines and 507s northern lines) Indeed the 507s used to have northern line destination blinds on the secondmans side.
Like others have said it just makes things more awkward in terms of stabling, maintaining and diagramming of units.

Firstly, I would like to oppose the use of stereotypes here. There are scallies everywhere. Not just in Merseyside. And if a Scally lived in Warrington I am sure he would have little choice but to use Northern. To say that they choose only to "scally" around on Merseyrail trains is a bit silly - they don't have a lot of choice who their local TOC is. And its not up to Merseyrail to refuse any one for how they look for as long as they are fare-paying passengers.

Secondly, I would like to commend Merseyrail on the high standards they maintain in their stock. There is absolutely no competition between Northern and Merseyrail's cleanliness record... Merseyrail are far superior. I live in Arriva-land and I find the trains here (even the recently refurbished ones) to be kept in appauling condition with little respect or care for doing a proper job. Considering the daily usage of a 507/8 unit, they are in remarkable condition. Merseyrail's approach to feet on seats etc may seem hard-line, but almost 10 years after refurbishment, the stock's interiors are in as good condition as the day they left Eastleigh. I have seen vandalism on their trains, yes, but they are extremely responsive to clear up the mess left by vandals.

I will feel slightly disappointed when the 507/508s eventually retire, but a sparkling interior will never cover up for problems caused by 40-year old EMUs underneath them. I do like the design and they do the job extremely well, but they were never designed for an underground metro-style network. However I hope they're not all sent to the scrapyard straight away - it would be a good time for Merseytravel and Taith to discuss the electrification of the Borderlands line along with the Kirkby and Ormskirk branches.

Here Here!

What ARE the differences between the two classes?
*The cabs are slightly different, the 507's have an older style, much larger speedo which is backlit by bulbs, the 508's have a more modern, smaller speedo (think sprinter) which apparently is illuminous.
*The 508s have an extra compressor in the TSO (accounting for there original 4 car formations)
*The 508's have a slightly different WSP system.
 
Sponsor Post - registered members do not see these adverts; click here to register, or click here to log in
R

RailUK Forums

tbtc

Veteran Member
Joined
16 Dec 2008
Messages
17,882
Location
Reston City Centre
The Wirral and Northern line fleets are not separate. A train can start the day on one side of the river and finish on the other. It is more normal to swap units overnight as many units from the Wirral visit Kirkdale overnight and return to the Wirral in the early morning to enter service.

To have separate fleets would increase the spares requirement and possibly require money to be spent on additional depot space on the Wirral.

Fair enough - I was only questioning it in case the two different areas justified their own priorities
 

Juniper Driver

Established Member
Joined
17 Jul 2007
Messages
2,074
Location
SWR Metals
How many Merseyrail units are there? I'd rather the coaches from these displaced trains be sent down to SWT and the Class 455's have an extra carriage put in to make some of the trains 5 coaches, and two units in multiple will of course make a 10 coach train, instead of the Class 456's going to SWT.

Edit: Just read the article and seen that there are 59 trains with MR, so if the TSO cars were taken out of each train, then 59 out of SWT's 91 455's could be strengthened to 5 cars. However would this be physically possible?

This seems like a good idea to me.Wonder whether the motors could handle an extra coach though.
Im not sure if the 456 idea is such a good one.
 

RobShipway

Established Member
Joined
20 Sep 2009
Messages
3,337
I think the Bombardier Aventra http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0azZJ8aloaQ would be a good train for Merseyrail and contrary to what has been said could be built at Derby despite it being dual voltage. You have to remember that the Class 379, 378, 377, 375 classe trains are all dual voltage and where all made in Derby.
 

WatcherZero

Established Member
Joined
25 Feb 2010
Messages
10,272
I think the Bombardier Aventra http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0azZJ8aloaQ would be a good train for Merseyrail and contrary to what has been said could be built at Derby despite it being dual voltage. You have to remember that the Class 379, 378, 377, 375 classe trains are all dual voltage and where all made in Derby.

Nothing to do with dual voltage, Derby is only setup with the tools and expertise to work in one metal.
 

Rhydgaled

Established Member
Joined
25 Nov 2010
Messages
4,568
Nothing to do with dual voltage, Derby is only setup with the tools and expertise to work in one metal.
Is the Aventra not going to be built using the same metal as Electrostarts then? I thought it was only the class 22x pantograph vehicles that would be steel and hence built abroad?

If Aventras are built, I hope they have corridor connections between units. Is that possible?
 

ainsworth74

Forum Staff
Staff Member
Global Moderator
Joined
16 Nov 2009
Messages
27,647
Location
Redcar
Is the Aventra not going to be built using the same metal as Electrostarts then? I thought it was only the class 22x pantograph vehicles that would be steel and hence built abroad?

I'm not sure if Bombardier have ever said where the Aventra would be built. Most assume that it would be Derby but that isn't certain and if it is being made out of steel then I'd say the chances are that it won't be built at Derby.

If Aventras are built, I hope they have corridor connections between units. Is that possible?

I will literally eat my hat (seriously I'll post pictures) if it isn't possible to put gangways on the front of it.
 

HSTEd

Veteran Member
Joined
14 Jul 2011
Messages
16,710
Nothing to do with dual voltage, Derby is only setup with the tools and expertise to work in one metal.

How did this happen out of interest?

They were building steel bodied carriages as late as 1988?

When did the transition to aluminium only occur?
 

ert47

Member
Joined
28 Feb 2010
Messages
688
I think the Bombardier Aventra http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0azZJ8aloaQ would be a good train for Merseyrail and contrary to what has been said could be built at Derby despite it being dual voltage. You have to remember that the Class 379, 378, 377, 375 classe trains are all dual voltage and where all made in Derby.

The 379 isnt dual voltage and is only takes power from a panto. But if you're going to say that its a unit that could be either, you might as well add the 376s and possibly the 357s
 

ainsworth74

Forum Staff
Staff Member
Global Moderator
Joined
16 Nov 2009
Messages
27,647
Location
Redcar
When did the transition to aluminium only occur?

When Derby's main products became Electrostars and Turbostars I'd imagine. Why bother maintaining another set of skills and equipment when you're not going to be needing it, as your only products are all aluminium bodied?
 

WatcherZero

Established Member
Joined
25 Feb 2010
Messages
10,272
I dont know a lot about the plant but with some casual reading seems to have been two waves of closures, the first in 1990 when BREL shut down and demolished most of the facilities and the second around 2004 when Bombardier rationalised its plants across Europe and decided they would each specialise and Derby became a specialist in bogie production and carriage shell production.
 

Juniper Driver

Established Member
Joined
17 Jul 2007
Messages
2,074
Location
SWR Metals
On 30 June 2009 unit 507002 without a driver rolled out of Kirkdale TMD, later derailing at a set of points further down.[2][3] The incident, which caused disruption to many services, was caused by leaving the train in gear whilst maintenance was performed so that when isolating wooden paddles were removed from between the conductor rail and pick-up shoes, the train moved off without a driver onboard. On 23 May 2011, it was announced by the Office of Rail Regulation that Merseyrail were fined £85,000 and ordered to pay legal costs of £20,970.15 due to the breach of the Health and Safety at Work etc. Act 1974 which resulted in this incident.[4][5][6]

How the hell do you leave an electric train "in gear".?

Was reading about the 507's and 508's and they are similar to my favourite 315's in there being motor coaches.DMSO's.
 

John55

Member
Joined
24 Jun 2011
Messages
800
Location
South East
On 30 June 2009 unit 507002 without a driver rolled out of Kirkdale TMD, later derailing at a set of points further down.[2][3] The incident, which caused disruption to many services, was caused by leaving the train in gear whilst maintenance was performed so that when isolating wooden paddles were removed from between the conductor rail and pick-up shoes, the train moved off without a driver onboard. On 23 May 2011, it was announced by the Office of Rail Regulation that Merseyrail were fined £85,000 and ordered to pay legal costs of £20,970.15 due to the breach of the Health and Safety at Work etc. Act 1974 which resulted in this incident.[4][5][6]

How the hell do you leave an electric train "in gear".?

Was reading about the 507's and 508's and they are similar to my favourite 315's in there being motor coaches.DMSO's.

When performing checks and or repairs on the traction control equipment you have to power it up. This control equipment is driven by the battery supply on the train so to let the control equipment go through it sequences without moving the train you could disconnect the control equipment from the motors etc (a relatively long and disruptive process) or isolate the train from the 3rd rail supply by putting wooden wedges under the shoes. The control equipment will then operate but with no current in the motors nothing moves. It is also much safer for the technician as he only has to worry about the battery voltage not the 750V as well.

If you then remove the isolation between the 3rd rail and the shoe gear and have left the controls in a motoring position the train will start and run off to collide with the buffers or whatever. During testing things like Drivers Vigilance may well be isolated and not help.
 
Last edited:

Juniper Driver

Established Member
Joined
17 Jul 2007
Messages
2,074
Location
SWR Metals
Aye I know that but I think the reporting is a bit wrong as usual as those trains haven't got gears.

Doesn't sound the safest practice,as well as putting the paddles down,why not isolate the third rail as well?

Looks like it wasn't this time,perhaps a misunderstanding in communication.
 

John55

Member
Joined
24 Jun 2011
Messages
800
Location
South East
Aye I know that but I think the reporting is a bit wrong as usual as those trains haven't got gears.

Doesn't sound the safest practice,as well as putting the paddles down,why not isolate the third rail as well?

Looks like it wasn't this time,perhaps a misunderstanding in communication.

The reporter is trying to explain an incident to the general public who have no interest in the technicalities of train operation but would like to know why there were no trains for 2 days and if anything was done about it.

Its not that bad an analogy after all an awful lot of people have been in a road vehicle which some clot has started the engine when in gear.

If I remember the report it was the second time in a couple of years that MR had done this. The other occasion at Birkenhead North.
 

davelew99

Member
Joined
7 Sep 2011
Messages
65
Why not just mandate that whenever the vehicle is supposedly isolated there is a person in the cab at all times?

Vehicle starts to move, person stops it. Pretty simple.
 

IanXC

Emeritus Moderator
Joined
18 Dec 2009
Messages
6,335
Why not just mandate that whenever the vehicle is supposedly isolated there is a person in the cab at all times?

Vehicle starts to move, person stops it. Pretty simple.

I think you've just created 1,000 jobs there, the cost of which is probably the reason this won't be the solution pursued!
 

Juniper Driver

Established Member
Joined
17 Jul 2007
Messages
2,074
Location
SWR Metals
I think you've just created 1,000 jobs there, the cost of which is probably the reason this won't be the solution pursued!

:lol:

The reporter is trying to explain an incident to the general public who have no interest in the technicalities of train operation but would like to know why there were no trains for 2 days and if anything was done about it.

Its not that bad an analogy after all an awful lot of people have been in a road vehicle which some clot has started the engine when in gear.

If I remember the report it was the second time in a couple of years that MR had done this. The other occasion at Birkenhead North.

Sorry,I find it bloody irritating but as you say it's got to be dumbed down.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Top