EWS 67029 and its train at London Waterloo

The 37 Fan · 6 Apr 2006

EWS silver 67029, the EWS silver DVT 82146 and their train at London Waterloo on a nice sunny late afternoon....

http://michaelsmodernukfreightlocos.photoblog.co.uk

RailUK Forums

Donny Dave · 6 Apr 2006

Spot the difference...

http://michaelsmodernukfreightlocos.photoblog.co.uk/p27728138.html
http://michaelsmodernukfreightlocos.photoblog.co.uk/p27728400.html
http://michaelsmodernukfreightlocos.photoblog.co.uk/p27728413.html

Also, spot the difference in these photos...

http://michaelsmodernukfreightlocos.photoblog.co.uk/p27728133.html
http://michaelsmodernukfreightlocos.photoblog.co.uk/p27728144.html
http://michaelsmodernukfreightlocos.photoblog.co.uk/p27728406.html

Michael, I know the EWS executive train at Waterloo is a rare sight, but do you need to post photo after photo, all showing the same thing when just 3 or 4 would have done?

Coxster · 6 Apr 2006

Two of the former are exactly the same judging by the position of a 'passer by' that looks like Chris Jolly (to me)!

The 37 Fan · 6 Apr 2006

Harry Potter said:
Spot the difference...

http://michaelsmodernukfreightlocos.photoblog.co.uk/p27728138.html
http://michaelsmodernukfreightlocos.photoblog.co.uk/p27728400.html
http://michaelsmodernukfreightlocos.photoblog.co.uk/p27728413.html

Also, spot the difference in these photos...

http://michaelsmodernukfreightlocos.photoblog.co.uk/p27728133.html
http://michaelsmodernukfreightlocos.photoblog.co.uk/p27728144.html
http://michaelsmodernukfreightlocos.photoblog.co.uk/p27728406.html

Michael, I know the EWS executive train at Waterloo is a rare sight, but do you need to post photo after photo, all showing the same thing when just 3 or 4 would have done?

Why have u duplicated some photos for a laugh???

That I take offence to AND YOU POST THE SAME THING ON LOADS OF FORUMS!!! still at least my pics dont have a slight fiz...

http://davidperks.fotopic.net/p27545312.html
http://davidperks.fotopic.net/p27545315.html

I will remove those links if you remove the ones from my site

Fair is fair

TheSlash · 6 Apr 2006

What does this train actually achieve?

Coxster · 6 Apr 2006

TheSlash said:
What does this train actually achieve?

Takes the EWS management about the UK whilst they drink their 300 year old vintage champagne talking about this year's profits...

The 37 Fan · 7 Apr 2006

Indeed, EWS boss Keith Heller and about another 20 or so EWS people on board, buffet car full of beer, having a meeting on train.

Train ran from Toton - Wembley (break) - London Waterloo (break) - Guildford (break) - London Waterloo (break) - Toton.

Donny Dave · 7 Apr 2006

The 37 Fan said:
Why have u duplicated some photos for a laugh???

That I take offence to AND YOU POST THE SAME THING ON LOADS OF FORUMS!!! still at least my pics dont have a slight fiz...

http://davidperks.fotopic.net/p27545312.html
http://davidperks.fotopic.net/p27545315.html

I will remove those links if you remove the ones from my site Fair is fair

I've not duplicated the photos at all. If you look closely, you'll see all the URL's are different, therefore they are differnt photos.

Also those photos you've highlighted from my site, take a look at the name of the collection.

PS. Thanks for looking at my site.
--- edited ---
Also, when you look at the name of the collection, have a look at the collection's description....

The 37 Fan · 7 Apr 2006

Was what you did done with nice intentions NO so either are these...

http://davidperks.fotopic.net/p27541491.html
http://davidperks.fotopic.net/p23111429.html
http://davidperks.fotopic.net/p23111450.html
http://davidperks.fotopic.net/p26592944.html (stand on the other platform)
http://davidperks.fotopic.net/p25866737.html
http://davidperks.fotopic.net/p22593367.html
http://davidperks.fotopic.net/p22622830.html
http://davidperks.fotopic.net/p22228234.html

I think I have made a point there a slight dark and more obsicales than evera, and those arent all from the same collection so a general problem.

As I said the above links will dissappear once you remove the links from mine in your thread, simple.

Also bet not to take the mick out of a guy who arranged you Crewe trip, not wise if you wish to come again.

As much as you are NORMALLY a nice fella you are pushing it big time, so I will push back and see how it feels the other way at YOUR LEVEL.

Tom · 7 Apr 2006

Your pictures are nearly all in the same location - you are pushing it big time too you know.

Coxster · 7 Apr 2006

Careful guys. A few photos isn't really worth falling out about is it now.

Tom · 7 Apr 2006

Indeed Coxster, but, Michael, why are:

http://michaelsmodernukfreightlocos.photoblog.co.uk/p27728138.html & http://michaelsmodernukfreightlocos.photoblog.co.uk/p27728413.html the same?

You may have changed the EXIF data, but on different Firefox tabs, just flicking between the two there are no changes.

The 37 Fan · 7 Apr 2006

I do not take kindly to **** taking, they are my photos and I do what I want with them and considering I spend several hours emailing, phoning and paying for trips I dont like being insulted back.

I am aware that you may not find my responce warranted and to a certain degree fine I admitt I was wrong however it really is annoying sometimes when no respect is shown. So from now on no trips in the future will be for names down I will be inviting people only as not only myself but others on here think a lack of respect is coming across from some who take advantage of these trips.

I will calm down tubechallenger fare enough however I will make you aware that HP posted the same thread on several other forums which is not nice at all.

Tom · 7 Apr 2006

He is allowed to unless its against forum rules!?!? Why are you bringing off-forum arguments into the forum - if in event of flamewar, break glass.

But again, why are 2 pictures the same?

Techniquest · 7 Apr 2006

Phot after phot was the same. I was going to post this yesterday, but more important things came up.

I am all for taking phots of something from different angles, on different filter settings and so on, but when the phots look to me the exact same it seems pointless. I might have taken a few shots on different settings (eg, I might grab a shot of a GNER HST somewhere but I would want the same shot on a higher resolution for making into a poster or something. It might be quite dark, so I'd want to change settings if the filter chosen didn't get the effect I wanted or the light was not strong enough. BUT, and here is my point, I wouldn't put them ALL on my Fotopic site. I'd choose my best one, maybe post one of the ones with different filter settings to demonstrate how it would look different or something. But half a dozen of the same photo, from the same angle, of the same stock in shot, with nothing except different commuters in the background or something, no I'm sorry but that's a pointless exercise.

That's my thoughts.

RJ · 7 Apr 2006

Duplication aside, I think you took some good shots, particularly of the 67

The 37 Fan · 7 Apr 2006

Thanks,

Regarding everyones thoughts fare enough but for now it will stay as it is, and when other collections get added, I will delete some duplicates ok?

Donny Dave · 7 Apr 2006

Michael, I was not taking the **** out of you, I was not insulting you, I gave (what I thought was) some constructive critiscism. If you want to take this any further, then speak to me at Crewe tomoroow.

Julian G · 7 Apr 2006

The 37 Fan said:
Thanks,

Regarding everyones thoughts fare enough but for now it will stay as it is, and when other collections get added, I will delete some duplicates ok?

excuse me, were you using flash at waterloo?

Sprog · 7 Apr 2006

TBH, lol

Me and my freind Kate have literally been LOLing at this whole topic!

:roll:

Craig · 7 Apr 2006

The 37 Fan said:
Regarding everyones thoughts fare enough but for now it will stay as it is, and when other collections get added, I will delete some duplicates ok?

Personally I'd delete all of the duplicates, then delete most of the other ones leaving 4 or 5.

Sprog said:
Me and my freind Kate have literally been LOLing at this whole topic! :roll:

Yes, it's been a very

topic

Sprog · 7 Apr 2006

Craig said:
...Yes, it's been a very

topic

Thats a new one for the Vocabulary

Craig · 7 Apr 2006

Sprog said:
Thats a new one for the Vocabulary

RJ · 7 Apr 2006

Ok everybody, Michael's aware that there are duplicates. Let's channel our anger/stress into the issue of the HN51 strain of bird flu affecting the Fort William sleeper

Coxster · 7 Apr 2006

What is 'ROFLE' Craig? "Roll on floor laughing endlessly"?

Craig · 7 Apr 2006

Coxster said:
What is 'ROFLE' Craig? "Roll on floor laughing endlessly"?

I dunno, I just saw the photo somewhere and found it amusing

Tom · 7 Apr 2006

HN51? You mean H5N1 joea1?

Craig · 7 Apr 2006

ChrisM · 7 Apr 2006

Great photos................but..........have to sort of agree that there are too many of the same ones.

Jim · 7 Apr 2006

Craig said:

OMFGLMAOROFL. I have to say, that is a great creation
--- edited ---
TBH, I think most of that argument was pretty childish, threating not to let someone on a forum meet by blackmailing :? HP in deleting the pics. He was, as HP pointed out, making a constructive comment, which you took pretty
badly :rolleyes:

EWS 67029 and its train at London Waterloo

Member

RailUK Forums

Established Member

Established Member

Member

Established Member

Established Member

Member

Established Member

Member

Tom

Guest

Established Member

Tom

Guest

Member

Tom

Guest

Veteran Member

Established Member

Member

Established Member

Established Member

Established Member

Established Member

Established Member

Established Member

Established Member

Established Member

Established Member

Tom

Guest

Established Member

Member

Established Member