• Our booking engine at tickets.railforums.co.uk (powered by TrainSplit) helps support the running of the forum with every ticket purchase! Find out more and ask any questions/give us feedback in this thread!

EWS 67029 and its train at London Waterloo

Status
Not open for further replies.
Sponsor Post - registered members do not see these adverts; click here to register, or click here to log in
R

RailUK Forums

David

Established Member
Joined
9 Jul 2005
Messages
5,103
Location
Scunthorpe

Coxster

Established Member
Joined
9 Jun 2005
Messages
9,244
Two of the former are exactly the same judging by the position of a 'passer by' that looks like Chris Jolly (to me)!
 

The 37 Fan

Member
Joined
12 Jan 2006
Messages
203
Location
London
Harry Potter said:

Why have u duplicated some photos for a laugh???

That I take offence to AND YOU POST THE SAME THING ON LOADS OF FORUMS!!! still at least my pics dont have a slight fiz...

http://davidperks.fotopic.net/p27545312.html
http://davidperks.fotopic.net/p27545315.html

I will remove those links if you remove the ones from my site ;) Fair is fair ;)
 

Coxster

Established Member
Joined
9 Jun 2005
Messages
9,244
TheSlash said:
What does this train actually achieve?
Takes the EWS management about the UK whilst they drink their 300 year old vintage champagne talking about this year's profits...
 

The 37 Fan

Member
Joined
12 Jan 2006
Messages
203
Location
London
Indeed, EWS boss Keith Heller and about another 20 or so EWS people on board, buffet car full of beer, having a meeting on train.

Train ran from Toton - Wembley (break) - London Waterloo (break) - Guildford (break) - London Waterloo (break) - Toton.
 

David

Established Member
Joined
9 Jul 2005
Messages
5,103
Location
Scunthorpe
The 37 Fan said:
Why have u duplicated some photos for a laugh???

That I take offence to AND YOU POST THE SAME THING ON LOADS OF FORUMS!!! still at least my pics dont have a slight fiz...

http://davidperks.fotopic.net/p27545312.html
http://davidperks.fotopic.net/p27545315.html

I will remove those links if you remove the ones from my site ;) Fair is fair ;)
I've not duplicated the photos at all. If you look closely, you'll see all the URL's are different, therefore they are differnt photos.

Also those photos you've highlighted from my site, take a look at the name of the collection. ;) :lol:

PS. Thanks for looking at my site.
--- edited ---
Also, when you look at the name of the collection, have a look at the collection's description....
 

The 37 Fan

Member
Joined
12 Jan 2006
Messages
203
Location
London
Was what you did done with nice intentions NO so either are these...

http://davidperks.fotopic.net/p27541491.html
http://davidperks.fotopic.net/p23111429.html
http://davidperks.fotopic.net/p23111450.html
http://davidperks.fotopic.net/p26592944.html (stand on the other platform)
http://davidperks.fotopic.net/p25866737.html
http://davidperks.fotopic.net/p22593367.html
http://davidperks.fotopic.net/p22622830.html
http://davidperks.fotopic.net/p22228234.html


I think I have made a point there a slight dark and more obsicales than evera, and those arent all from the same collection so a general problem.

As I said the above links will dissappear once you remove the links from mine in your thread, simple.

Also bet not to take the mick out of a guy who arranged you Crewe trip, not wise if you wish to come again.

As much as you are NORMALLY a nice fella you are pushing it big time, so I will push back and see how it feels the other way at YOUR LEVEL.
 
T

Tom

Guest
Your pictures are nearly all in the same location - you are pushing it big time too you know.
 

Coxster

Established Member
Joined
9 Jun 2005
Messages
9,244
Careful guys. A few photos isn't really worth falling out about is it now.
 

The 37 Fan

Member
Joined
12 Jan 2006
Messages
203
Location
London
I do not take kindly to **** taking, they are my photos and I do what I want with them and considering I spend several hours emailing, phoning and paying for trips I dont like being insulted back.

I am aware that you may not find my responce warranted and to a certain degree fine I admitt I was wrong however it really is annoying sometimes when no respect is shown. So from now on no trips in the future will be for names down I will be inviting people only as not only myself but others on here think a lack of respect is coming across from some who take advantage of these trips.

I will calm down tubechallenger fare enough however I will make you aware that HP posted the same thread on several other forums which is not nice at all.
 
T

Tom

Guest
He is allowed to unless its against forum rules!?!? Why are you bringing off-forum arguments into the forum - if in event of flamewar, break glass.

But again, why are 2 pictures the same?
 

Techniquest

Veteran Member
Joined
19 Jun 2005
Messages
21,674
Location
Nowhere Heath
Phot after phot was the same. I was going to post this yesterday, but more important things came up.

I am all for taking phots of something from different angles, on different filter settings and so on, but when the phots look to me the exact same it seems pointless. I might have taken a few shots on different settings (eg, I might grab a shot of a GNER HST somewhere but I would want the same shot on a higher resolution for making into a poster or something. It might be quite dark, so I'd want to change settings if the filter chosen didn't get the effect I wanted or the light was not strong enough. BUT, and here is my point, I wouldn't put them ALL on my Fotopic site. I'd choose my best one, maybe post one of the ones with different filter settings to demonstrate how it would look different or something. But half a dozen of the same photo, from the same angle, of the same stock in shot, with nothing except different commuters in the background or something, no I'm sorry but that's a pointless exercise.

That's my thoughts.
 

RJ

Established Member
Joined
25 Jun 2005
Messages
8,383
Location
Back office
Duplication aside, I think you took some good shots, particularly of the 67 :)
 

The 37 Fan

Member
Joined
12 Jan 2006
Messages
203
Location
London
Thanks,

Regarding everyones thoughts fare enough but for now it will stay as it is, and when other collections get added, I will delete some duplicates ok?
 

David

Established Member
Joined
9 Jul 2005
Messages
5,103
Location
Scunthorpe
Michael, I was not taking the **** out of you, I was not insulting you, I gave (what I thought was) some constructive critiscism. If you want to take this any further, then speak to me at Crewe tomoroow.
 

Julian G

Established Member
Joined
9 Jun 2005
Messages
3,545
The 37 Fan said:
Thanks,

Regarding everyones thoughts fare enough but for now it will stay as it is, and when other collections get added, I will delete some duplicates ok?
excuse me, were you using flash at waterloo?
 

Sprog

Established Member
Joined
6 Sep 2005
Messages
1,315
Location
SPM
TBH, lol <D :lol:

Me and my freind Kate have literally been LOLing at this whole topic! ;) :roll: :lol:

:lol: :lol: :lol: :lol:
 

Craig

Established Member
Joined
15 Jun 2005
Messages
3,958
Location
Newcastle
The 37 Fan said:
Regarding everyones thoughts fare enough but for now it will stay as it is, and when other collections get added, I will delete some duplicates ok?
Personally I'd delete all of the duplicates, then delete most of the other ones leaving 4 or 5.

Sprog said:
Me and my freind Kate have literally been LOLing at this whole topic! ;) :roll: :lol:
Yes, it's been a very
rofl.jpg
topic :lol:
 

RJ

Established Member
Joined
25 Jun 2005
Messages
8,383
Location
Back office
Ok everybody, Michael's aware that there are duplicates. Let's channel our anger/stress into the issue of the HN51 strain of bird flu affecting the Fort William sleeper :)
 

Coxster

Established Member
Joined
9 Jun 2005
Messages
9,244
What is 'ROFLE' Craig? "Roll on floor laughing endlessly"?
 

ChrisM

Member
Joined
14 Aug 2005
Messages
716
Great photos................but..........have to sort of agree that there are too many of the same ones.
 

Jim

Established Member
Joined
11 Jun 2005
Messages
3,398
Location
Wick
Craig said:
OMFGLMAOROFL. I have to say, that is a great creation
--- edited ---
TBH, I think most of that argument was pretty childish, threating not to let someone on a forum meet by blackmailing :? HP in deleting the pics. He was, as HP pointed out, making a constructive comment, which you took pretty
badly:rolleyes:
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Top