Ex Physics Teacher claims "children 'being shaken out of bed' by train noise"

Discussion in 'Infrastructure & Stations' started by route:oxford, 22 Apr 2018.

  1. Ianno87

    Ianno87 Established Member

    Messages:
    5,206
    Joined:
    3 May 2015
    And Southampton-Oxford-Midlands is less mileage than Southampton-Wembley-Midlands.

    Less mileage = Less fuel = Less emissions overall.

    Economic amd environmental common sense, not conspiracy.
     
  2. furnessvale

    furnessvale Established Member

    Messages:
    3,274
    Joined:
    14 Jul 2015
    [QUOTE="j
    Buy a house near an airport - expect aeroplanes, buy a house near a railway - expect trains. We could ban freight trains entirely so the darlings will sleep but then they would complain when the motorways are clogged with stone lorries and container trucks![/QUOTE]
    No they won't. You forget the one vital factor. The motorway passes SOMEONE ELSE's house!
     
  3. Doctor Fegg

    Doctor Fegg Member

    Messages:
    759
    Joined:
    9 Nov 2010
    Sure, but to be fair that is a significant element of the complaints from some North Oxford residents: electric trains in the sidings north of Oxford station would make a lot less noise than HSTs and Turbos rumbling away.

    If I lived in North Oxford it wouldn't be the thing I complained about - I'd be more irate at the constant hum of car traffic, as I was when I lived a short distance from the WCML in North London. But I wouldn't dismiss their complaints out of hand.
     
  4. mallard

    mallard Established Member

    Messages:
    1,305
    Joined:
    12 Apr 2009
    As I made completely clear in my previous post; I do not believe political pressure is applied directly to train planning. That is, as you say, "fanciful". Political pressure is applied to which routes are considered "suitible" for heavy freight and therefore which lines are maintained to a suitable standard and open for traffic during the night.

    As far as I can tell, most Southampton freights operate to the North West (Manchester/Liverpool area), very few terminate in the West Midlands. A fair few also operate to Leeds. The difference in milage is much less significant for those routes.

    Only if diesel traction is used throughout... Long runs up the WCML are much better suited to electric traction.
     
  5. Controller1701

    Controller1701 Member

    Messages:
    101
    Joined:
    7 Dec 2012
    I can suggest an easy solution to this problem. Insert buffer stops at the Oxford end of the following stations, Appleford (able to turn back via the crossover into the siding), Tackley (Turn back using Tackley ground frame), Finstock (Platform on single line = very easy) and Bicester Village. Then lift all rails and tarmac over the rail formation and voila no more nasty noisy trains to disturb the residents of Oxford and North Oxford. Those people can then sleep nice and quietly with no disturbance.

    Paul
     
  6. DarloRich

    DarloRich Veteran Member

    Messages:
    22,346
    Joined:
    12 Oct 2010
    Location:
    Work - Fenny Stratford(MK) Home - Darlington
    You clearly believe this strongly but this is also, at best, fanciful. Can you provide any evidence of this political pressure?
     
  7. shredder1

    shredder1 Established Member

    Messages:
    1,828
    Joined:
    23 Nov 2016
    Location:
    North Manchester
    I was born in the 1950`s and my bedroom overlooked the Mills Hill loop on the Calder Valley line, which was very busy in those days. I`d often have a WD Austerity parked outside my bedroom window and trains would rumble on though the night. I`d fall asleep to the sounds of shunting freight trains. When I got married I moved out of the area into a small village which had never had a railway, it was very quiet and I had trouble sleeping for years, the one thing that sent me to sleep was those Argos steam train recordings. The thought of being shaken out of bed by a train these days would be extremely exciting and desirable.
     
  8. mallard

    mallard Established Member

    Messages:
    1,305
    Joined:
    12 Apr 2009
    Sure, from a parliamentary written response in July 2017:
    Can't get much clearer than that...

    Then there's this in a Network Rail planning document for the Ipswich Chord (in a paragraph listing the objectives of the national "Strategic Freight Network" in general, not just the Ipswich scheme):

    Which is exactly what you called a "conspiracy theory"...
     
  9. DarloRich

    DarloRich Veteran Member

    Messages:
    22,346
    Joined:
    12 Oct 2010
    Location:
    Work - Fenny Stratford(MK) Home - Darlington
    A statement that the government discusses, amoungst, other things noise, vibration and pollution with Network Rail. Really. Wow. A question, I should point out, raised by the MP for that famous London Borough: Stirling.

    You have taken one sentence in 33 page report and presented completely out of context. Without that context your statements seem to support your views. However, reading the full document ( even just searching for the word: London) the context of that line becomes clear. The reason why freight is diverted away from London is not because of some secretive political pressure but because of conflicts with the congested passenger network.

    Just stop now eh?
     
  10. mallard

    mallard Established Member

    Messages:
    1,305
    Joined:
    12 Apr 2009
    Then why is this a seperate "objective"?

    Surely if the only reason to avoid London were to avoid the congested passenger network, they wouldn't need two objectives that amount to the same thing...? Why single out London for special consideration? Why are you so insistent that the UK government is always 100% impartial in relation to distribution of resources between London and the rest of the country?
     
  11. Ianno87

    Ianno87 Established Member

    Messages:
    5,206
    Joined:
    3 May 2015
    Because demand for passenger services in/through London (where capacity is still finite) is an order of magnitude higher than the rest of the country. It thus makes no sense to send freight trains through London that have no need to be there and thus use up this valuable capacity.
     
  12. mallard

    mallard Established Member

    Messages:
    1,305
    Joined:
    12 Apr 2009
    But thanks to the generous infrastructure investment in London, the demand-in-excess-of-capacity (PIXC) is only slightly higher than Manchester (and is set to reduce now that LSE passenger numbers have stopped growing while infrastructure investment is in full swing). Also, peak-time passenger loadings aren't all that relevant when considering overnight freight routes...
     
  13. BRX

    BRX Established Member

    Messages:
    2,046
    Joined:
    20 Oct 2008
    There is a lot of nonsense being written about freight through London.

    I live right next to the south London Line, which is the main freight route from the Channel Tunnel, Kent and points on the south side of the Thames estuary for trains that need to get north or west of London from those places. Despite various schemes over the years to have a 'bypass' line (eg via Redhill and Guildford) for such traffic none has come to fruition and therefore all of that freight traffic (now with the exception of a small proportion that goes via HS1) is routed through relatively central south London through densely built up residential areas. If there's a conspiracy to send freight elsewhere it's not been very successful. This traffic mainly heads up the WLL after reaching the Clapham area.

    Heavy aggregates trains pass regularly. Freight is mainly slotted in between rush hours when the line is most intensively used. Chunnel traffic (although there's not a lot of it at present) tends to be taken through the tunnel overnight, so trains from there often pass in the wee small hours. I'm not aware of any particular directive that freight should not run at night so as not to disturb people. If and when Chunnel traffic picks up again, I expect a lot of it will fill the currently unused paths during the night because there's not loads of spare capacity during the day.

    Regarding being shaken out of bed - the house does shake, sometimes with things visibly moving. It depends on things like how much water is in the ground and I assume the weight of trains and whether the speed they happen to be going at hits some kind of resonant frequency. What's noticeable though, and commented upon by most guests, is that there's more disturbance from road traffic on a not especially major street. And the house also shakes when an HGV goes over the speed bump just up the road.

    Freight going by road disturbs (and indeed kills) far more people than that going by rail.

    And if like me you decide to live next to a railway you can't expect it never to make any noise or disturbance.

    The most fun is when the tamping machine or rail grinder comes past repeatedly at 3am!
     
  14. Ianno87

    Ianno87 Established Member

    Messages:
    5,206
    Joined:
    3 May 2015
    It is most definitely relevant. The only time to maintain the London network is largely at night, so freight has to be sent elsewhere in the meantime.


    Obviously *some* traffic has to go via London. Aggregates traffic for construction is by definition bound for London anyway, and Channel Tunnel traffic essentially has no way of avoiding inner London at all (lacking a suitable chord at Redhill). These flows (limited in the grand scheme of things) are manageable via London. Intermodals from Southampton (more significant in number, and growing) are of sufficient volume not to be manageable via London.
     
  15. a good off

    a good off Member

    Messages:
    242
    Joined:
    2 Jul 2010
    Location:
    Control Room
    I’ve just googled Layla Moran. What an absolute shock to find out that she’s an MP for the Liberals... I’d never have guessed.
     
  16. muddythefish

    muddythefish On Moderation

    Messages:
    1,375
    Joined:
    13 May 2014
    Lovely post.

    The sound of shunting and wagons crashing into each other as trains are marshalled is one I shall never forget.
     
  17. Joseph_Locke

    Joseph_Locke Established Member

    Messages:
    1,802
    Joined:
    14 Apr 2012
    Location:
    Within earshot of trains passing the one and half
    Speaking as Railwayman and physicist, even the laden oil trains passing over the S&C just outside the windows of our office was only sufficient to create minor Bessell functions on the surface of a cup of 57/00001.
     
  18. Joseph_Locke

    Joseph_Locke Established Member

    Messages:
    1,802
    Joined:
    14 Apr 2012
    Location:
    Within earshot of trains passing the one and half
    No, you don't, not unless you can prove beyond reasonable challenge that your health or the fabric of property or the undertaking of your lawful business has been materially affected. The lawful business of Network Rail is operating a Railway.
     
  19. Flying Phil

    Flying Phil Established Member

    Messages:
    1,072
    Joined:
    18 Apr 2016
    Perhaps NR should use this positively and sell recordings of passing freight trains to parents desperately trying to get their children out of bed!
     
  20. jimm

    jimm Established Member

    Messages:
    4,694
    Joined:
    6 Apr 2012
    Really? Well her predecessor as MP for Oxford West and Abingdon wasn't a Liberal Democrat, and also had plenty to say on the subject of noise and trains through Wolvercote. Part of an MP's job (and councillors) is speak up about concerns that constituents' raise with them.

    Would you have guessed Nicola Blackwood was a Conservative - or Labour, Green, UKIP or anything else - on the basis of anything said below?

    http://www.nicolablackwood.com/keeping-up-the-pressure-on-rail-noise/

    http://www.nicolablackwood.com/more-trains-less-noise/

    http://www.nicolablackwood.com/nicola-pushes-for-commitment-on-silent-rail/

    http://www.nicolablackwood.com/nicola-pushes-for-commitment-on-silent-rail/

    http://www.nicolablackwood.com/public-meeting-with-rail-minister-and-network-rail/

    http://www.oxfordmail.co.uk/news/14...ork_Rail_silent_track_claims_in_North_Oxford/
     
  21. shredder1

    shredder1 Established Member

    Messages:
    1,828
    Joined:
    23 Nov 2016
    Location:
    North Manchester
    Thank you, yes great memories of unbraked freight, my playground was Newton Heath loco sheds, we`d run to the shops for drivers and firemen and in return they give us rides down to the turntable on footplates.
     
  22. aformeruser

    aformeruser Veteran Member

    Messages:
    30,637
    Joined:
    23 Jan 2009
    As I already clarified in another post I said you've got a right to complain, not you're automatically entitled to compensation. Saying people don't have the right to complain is effectively the same as saying people should do what dictators tell them to do.

    As someone who lives under the flight path for the newish second runway at Manchester Airport I'm well aware of how difficult it can be for people to prove it's having a direct impact. For instance, those who purchased their house before plans for a second runway were approved didn't have a up-to-date value of their house prior to the second runway opening and as house prices have increased anyway the challenge wasn't to prove the opening of the second runway had caused your property to decrease in value but that the increase in value was lower than it would have been had the second runway not been built. Originally the airport drew a line on a map and said those the right side of the line would get compensation - the line meant one terrace house wasn't entitled to compensation but their next door neighbour was!

    Likewise if you have a sleep problem which gets worse, how do you prove it wouldn't have got worse even without the overnight noise pollution?
     
  23. The_Engineer

    The_Engineer Member

    Messages:
    524
    Joined:
    24 Mar 2018
    Sadly, all too common. Often they say that they didn't realise trains run all night, or they didn't see any when they looked around the house...... Goes under the same heading as person buys house in countryside, complains that countryside smells......
     
  24. muddythefish

    muddythefish On Moderation

    Messages:
    1,375
    Joined:
    13 May 2014
    Can you imagine that now ? The drivers would lose their jobs.

    Life was much more fun in t' olden days
     
  25. shredder1

    shredder1 Established Member

    Messages:
    1,828
    Joined:
    23 Nov 2016
    Location:
    North Manchester

    Yes indeed things have changed so much in the UK and not always for the better, mind you I went to a school full of asbestos, clung on to moving coal trains and smoked dope and dropped acid in the 60`s, and did a ton 20 on motorbikes without crash helmets, survived the lot, (just)
     

Share This Page