Also consider trying to become pescatarian
Almost certainly not a good idea - eating an increased amount of fish is unlikely to be sustainable. Already fish is being transported around the planet - it is not a green option.
Also consider trying to become pescatarian
Petrol golfs have the badge, trim and accents in red. (link for image)
https://www.autoexpress.co.uk/volkswagen/golf/105734/new-volkswagen-golf-gti-tcr-2019-review
The Golf GTD models used to have black trims and badges, but along with the R are now silver or match the body colour or no markings at all to keep the fact that they are diesels more discreet.
The facts don't support this view - the world isn't overpopulated or likely to become so. But please created a new thread to discuss that.In any case, global warming and talk of vegetarianism are themselves distractions from the real issue, which is over-population.
I agree completely. However, it might be a useful stepping stone for people who look at advice to become vegetarian and see it as an unachievably high bar.Almost certainly not a good idea - eating an increased amount of fish is unlikely to be sustainable.
I would not stop eating meat, but have made changes. Venison has replaced beef for me. Its cheap locally, cheaper than beef and being wild is effectively low carbon. In most forms, fresh venison is very close to beef but much healthier for you.
I also dilute meat with pulses. beans, mushrooms and more veg.
I treat meat, especially a roast joint or steak as a treat as it always used to be and still is in most countries and not as a daily staple.
Back when I was growing up, mixing veg, beans etc with what meat we could afford was a common practice. For those born in Liverpool as I was, the word "Scouse" has more than one meaning, with one being a stew made up of all the bits not eaten on Sunday, topped up with more veg to make it go further. To this day, this kind of stew is a staple that we can chuck practically anything into, and stops an awful lot of waste, and with a little bit of herb & spice creativity can be blumming gorgeous!
We, as a nation, used to be far more able to make a little go a long way. I'm not suggesting we revert to 1970's or earlier styles of meals, but things like knowing when food is about to turn, & what you can use it for before it does seems to be something of a lost art, and why we as a nation throw an appalling third of the food we buy away, sometimes without even taking it out of the packaging. There's some pretty big footprint savings to be made here, and not just in carbon!
Ah but now those dull stews or use up meals have a whole range of spices that you can add nowadays. I replaced my mum's OXO cubes with Indian spices, so much better and in the slow cooker during the day can run off solar even on a dull wet day.
Funny but my wastage is minimal. Usually a fruit gone mouldy early. Bread goes in the freezer for toasting, veg in the use up pot. Leftovers go in a glass lunchbox for packed lunches!
The same here, we throw practically nothing away & if anything looks like it is on the turn it will get used in something & frozen, usually for my work lunches. And I take bread one step further, my local Co-op has certain times of the day when they drastically reduce the price of fresh bread, and yours truly is on hand to snap some up to freeze! However in my defence, I am in Yorkshire....
Britain has contributed to the global climate emergency by outsourcing its carbon emissions to developing nations, according to official figures, despite managing to weaken the domestic link between fossil fuels and economic growth.
The Office for National Statistics said the UK had become the biggest net importer of carbon dioxide emissions per capita in the G7 group of wealthy nations – outstripping the US and Japan – as a result of buying goods manufactured abroad.
The ONS warned that Britain had increased its net imports of CO2 emissions per capita from 1.7 tonnes in 1992 to 5.1 tonnes in 2007, offsetting domestic progress on shifting the UK economy away from fossil fuels.
Drivers of electric cars across the UK may soon be using special green number plates under new plans.
The aim is to make it possible for local authorities to allow zero-emission vehicles to benefit from incentives such as cheaper parking.
The government hopes it will boost electric car sales, helping it achieve its 2050 target of net zero emissions.
But Friends of the Earth said without better financial incentives and more charging points, little would change.
The government is asking industry and the public for their views on how to implement the scheme.
"As the UK moves at pace towards net zero emissions, the initiative aims to raise awareness of the increasing number of zero tailpipe emission vehicles on UK roads," said the Department for Transport (DfT).
Would you have as much difficulty understanding the import of virtual water then?The mind boggles when trying to picture the physical look of imported or exported carbon dioxide emissions. What method of packaging is used and are there special containers in which to transport them on their journey. How are these emissions weighed prior to transportation? What colours of these carbon dioxide emissions are used, which would facilitate the packaging of them?
Perhaps Hogwarts has an offered course that I might attend where such matters can be explained.....
Virtual water trade (also known as trade in embedded or embodied water) refers to the hidden flow of water if food or other commodities are traded from one place to another.
[It] refers to the idea that when goods and services are exchanged, so is virtual water. When a country imports one tonne of wheat instead of producing it domestically, it is saving about 1,300 cubic meters of real indigenous water. If this country is water-scarce, the water that is 'saved' can be used towards other ends. If the exporting country is water-scarce, however, it has exported 1,300 cubic meters of virtual water since the real water used to grow the wheat will no longer be available for other purposes. This has obvious strategic implications for countries that are water-constrained such as those found in the Southern African Development Community (SADC) area.
I find this sort of thing very good. As a rule, I prefer giving people incentives to do one thing, not ban them from doing the other. Obviously, this on its own will do sod all, but coupled with more radical action it should make things better.Looks like it might be easier for reddragon to work out which vehicles they can let out of side roads soon...
https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/business-50122268
I find this sort of thing very good. As a rule, I prefer giving people incentives to do one thing, not ban them from doing the other. Obviously, this on its own will do sod all, but coupled with more radical action it should make things better.
I thought that we're trying to make the electric car look more normal?Looks like it might be easier for reddragon to work out which vehicles they can let out of side roads soon...
https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/business-50122268
EVs lessen but don't solve the problems of road traffic. There are still the effects of congestion, environmental downsides of vehicle manufacture and particulates from tyres. And if the government keeps throwing incentives at them then they'll find their tax base disappears along with fossil-fuel vehicles, and it will be politically very difficult to reverse course and start taxing EVs to pay for the considerable remaining costs attributable to car use.
EVs lessen but don't solve the problems of road traffic. There are still the effects of congestion, environmental downsides of vehicle manufacture and particulates from tyres. And if the government keeps throwing incentives at them then they'll find their tax base disappears along with fossil-fuel vehicles, and it will be politically very difficult to reverse course and start taxing EVs to pay for the considerable remaining costs attributable to car use.