As things stand there is no obvious way to resource a 16.30 SHR-AYW.
To resource a 16.30 ex Aber I can see two options.
(1) the unit off maintenance at MCH - risky.
(2) the coast portion that attaches to the 15.30 Up - in the same way that the 18.30 is formed - but would that cause problems either from SHR or on the return from International?
Apologies if this is a red herring, and I'm sure it has been discussed before, but after a visit to the line on Monday I wondered whether a better timetable - until the extra units appear - would be based around alternating Coast and Aber trains, with some strengthening using the "extra" units (OK marginal time workings)?
The obvious difficulties are, I think
(1) you lose a 1730 departure from Aber because the Coast trains can't easily be altered
(2) the year round loadings are higher from Aber than the Coast.
No doubt the RUG people know of more disadvantages.
To resource a 16.30 ex Aber I can see two options.
(1) the unit off maintenance at MCH - risky.
(2) the coast portion that attaches to the 15.30 Up - in the same way that the 18.30 is formed - but would that cause problems either from SHR or on the return from International?
Apologies if this is a red herring, and I'm sure it has been discussed before, but after a visit to the line on Monday I wondered whether a better timetable - until the extra units appear - would be based around alternating Coast and Aber trains, with some strengthening using the "extra" units (OK marginal time workings)?
The obvious difficulties are, I think
(1) you lose a 1730 departure from Aber because the Coast trains can't easily be altered
(2) the year round loadings are higher from Aber than the Coast.
No doubt the RUG people know of more disadvantages.