• Our booking engine at tickets.railforums.co.uk (powered by TrainSplit) helps support the running of the forum with every ticket purchase! Find out more and ask any questions/give us feedback in this thread!

Face coverings mandatory in shops in Scotland

Status
Not open for further replies.

Silver Cobra

Member
Joined
4 Jun 2015
Messages
868
Location
Bedfordshire
It's been announced in the last 10 minutes that face coverings will be mandatory in all shops in Scotland from 9th July.


The use of face coverings will become mandatory in shops in Scotland from 9 July as coronavirus restrictions are eased, Nicola Sturgeon has said.

Non-essential shops have re-opened in Scotland and bars and restaurants are due to open up again later this month.

The first minister said the 2m physical distancing rule would be eased for some premises when the country enters the next "phase" of its routemap on 9 July.

And she said face coverings would be mandatory in shops from that date.

Ms Sturgeon also announced that children under the age of 12 would no longer need to maintain physical distancing from other households.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Sponsor Post - registered members do not see these adverts; click here to register, or click here to log in
R

RailUK Forums

Butts

Veteran Member
Joined
16 Jan 2011
Messages
11,323
Location
Stirlingshire
While this isn't specifically referring to just supermarkets, it's been announced in the last 10 minutes that face coverings will be mandatory in all shops in Scotland from 9th July.


Not happy about this, if it was that important why was it not enacted at the same time as the requirement on Public Transport ?
 

HSTEd

Veteran Member
Joined
14 Jul 2011
Messages
16,727
Not happy about this, if it was that important why was it not enacted at the same time as the requirement on Public Transport ?
Are you sure you want to continue this line of questioning?
 

trebor79

Established Member
Joined
8 Mar 2018
Messages
4,451

The use of face coverings will become mandatory in shops in Scotland as coronavirus restrictions are eased, Nicola Sturgeon has said.

Non-essential shops have reopened in Scotland and bars and restaurants are due to open up again later this month.

The first minister said the 2m physical distancing rule would be eased for some premises when the country enters the next phase of its routemap on 10 July.

And she said face coverings would be mandatory in shops from that date.


How likely are we to follow suite in England?
I'm really hoping this is just Nicola Sturgeon trying to one up Boris. I really can't see any justification for this measure, if infection levels start to rise then maybe it's something that could be thought about as an absolute last resort.
Fingers crossed Westminster doesn't do anything as daft as copy this move. That will be the official end of the high street.
 
Last edited by a moderator:

Yew

Established Member
Joined
12 Mar 2011
Messages
6,550
Location
UK
Indeed, tokenistic virtue signalling in it's extreme.
 

Mcr Warrior

Veteran Member
Joined
8 Jan 2009
Messages
11,816
As broadcast on BBC Radio 4's "Dead Ringers" radio show last weekend, Nicola Sturgeon's continuing policy seems to be to do whatever is the complete opposite of what Boris Johnson does, and this seems to be yet another example! :rolleyes:
 

Baxenden Bank

Established Member
Joined
23 Oct 2013
Messages
4,017
While this isn't specifically referring to just supermarkets, it's been announced in the last 10 minutes that face coverings will be mandatory in all shops in Scotland from 9th July.

Anyone would think she was hell bent on removing any kind of freedom or pleasure in life whilst completely destroying the economy. Is she a Wee Free Presbyterian?

Glad I cancelled my Scottish holidays this year!

I have a new plan. In future, I shall spend my money where it is welcome, looks like most of this will be going to Amazon!
 

Smidster

Member
Joined
23 Oct 2014
Messages
562
I would be very surprised if this is not included in the English regulations when they are updated before Saturday - though I hope I am wrong.

It seems that right now we have pretty low infection rates and where we do have outbreaks they are pretty well contained within localities - this is a bludgeon at a problem that really doesn't seem to be there right now - Another example of introducing more restrictions after the event.

It also does real damage to the economic recovery - We are trying to get people out and about again and this is just another barrier to that. Doing anything is going to be such a chore that who is going to want to venture out? Not least because the first thing you think when you see everyone wearing masks is that there must be a very significant and impending risk everywhere.
 

trebor79

Established Member
Joined
8 Mar 2018
Messages
4,451
I would be very surprised if this is not included in the English regulations when they are updated before Saturday - though I hope I am wrong.
I really hope we escape this nonsense. The litter that this would generate would be awful. Plus it just looks silly and awful everyone going about in masks that aren't fitted properly.
And wearing a mask is horrible for the user too.
I'll be deploying my anxiety excuse if it comes in here.
I don't think there's widespread support for this, otherwise there would be more than 1 or 2 people spotted wearing masks when I do the weekly shop.
 

Richard Scott

Established Member
Joined
13 Dec 2018
Messages
3,696
I really hope we escape this nonsense. The litter that this would generate would be awful. Plus it just looks silly and awful everyone going about in masks that aren't fitted properly.
And wearing a mask is horrible for the user too.
I'll be deploying my anxiety excuse if it comes in here.
I don't think there's widespread support for this, otherwise there would be more than 1 or 2 people spotted wearing masks when I do the weekly shop.
The litter is the key here, they've already found used masks in the oceans. So her contribution is even more waste plastic/fabrics. Great one there!
 

HSTEd

Veteran Member
Joined
14 Jul 2011
Messages
16,727
I guess I will not being going to shops any time soon if this is introduced in England.
 

Scrotnig

Member
Joined
5 Sep 2017
Messages
592
The litter is the key here, they've already found used masks in the oceans. So her contribution is even more waste plastic/fabrics. Great one there!
You’re forgetting, nobody cares about environmental pollution any more, because it’s not the DEADLY KILLER VIRUS.
 

MikeWM

Established Member
Joined
26 Mar 2010
Messages
4,411
Location
Ely
I would be very surprised if this is not included in the English regulations when they are updated before Saturday - though I hope I am wrong.

I wouldn't expect so (and I hope I'm right). The Government won't want the optics of being 'forced' into it by the SNP.

Doesn't mean it won't happen eventually, of course.
 

Non Multi

Member
Joined
11 Dec 2017
Messages
1,117
Has social distancing been a problem in Scotland? Surely they could have kept the status quo for the wide aisled stores.

Oh well, it's good news for the politically fashionable chinstrap factories!
 

HSTEd

Veteran Member
Joined
14 Jul 2011
Messages
16,727
Otherwise worded as "we have had to temporarily pause environmental concerns about disposable items in order to prevent people dying".

I think you mean something like this:

"we have had to 'temporarily' pause environmental concerns about disposable items, for the forseable future, in order to make it look like we are doing something to stop people dying"
 

adc82140

Established Member
Joined
10 May 2008
Messages
2,933
Otherwise worded as "we have had to temporarily pause environmental concerns about disposable items in order to prevent people dying".
I really think that dying because of a polluted biosphere is just as important
 

greyman42

Established Member
Joined
14 Aug 2017
Messages
4,940
Otherwise worded as "we have had to temporarily pause environmental concerns about disposable items in order to prevent people dying".
The virus does not kill everyone, far from it, and people die for many other reasons.
 

scotrail158713

Established Member
Joined
30 Jan 2019
Messages
1,797
Location
Dundee
I really think that dying because of a polluted biosphere is just as important
I’d agree but unfortunately no governments seem to hold the same viewpoint - as @Scrotnig put it, “it’s not the deadly killer virus so it doesn’t matter” seems to be the general view.
 

DB

Guest
Joined
18 Nov 2009
Messages
5,036
I'm really hoping this is just Nicola Sturgeon trying to one up Boris. I really can't see any justification for this measure, if infection levels start to rise then maybe it's something that could be thought about as an absolute last resort.

Given that the evidence for it making any actual difference is weak at best, it would be pretty hopeless as a last resort!

As others have said, this is just tokenism and Sturgeon trying to show that she's got more of a handle on the situation than Boris.
 

Scotrail12

Member
Joined
16 Nov 2014
Messages
835
Tokenism, virtue signalling, just trying to look better than ole Boris. If so important, why not made mandatory earlier? I went shopping for some things on Monday and people were distancing fine.

I also don't really see how this law will be enforced, I can't imagine shop workers wanting to start confrontation and they don't even have much powers. I also question if the public will follow through for long (if at all) and how long this rule will be a thing.

I do see the argument for them on a crowded train where many people are very close to each other. Otherwise, not so much.

I don't like shopping that much anyway so I'll probably stay away from "non-essential" shops as much as possible for now.
 

DB

Guest
Joined
18 Nov 2009
Messages
5,036
Tokenism, virtue signalling, just trying to look better than ole Boris. If so important, why not made mandatory earlier? I went shopping for some things on Monday and people were distancing fine.

It wasn't made mandatory before because it was known that the evidence for any benefit was weak.

But now the politicians are all fighting to show that they can out-do each other in playing to the crowd, and this is an easy one to go for.
 

Ianigsy

Member
Joined
12 May 2015
Messages
1,111
A shoplifters' charter and one which stands to choke off discretionary spending just as it gets going.
 

Mag_seven

Forum Staff
Staff Member
Global Moderator
Joined
1 Sep 2014
Messages
10,033
Location
here to eternity
Can we please stick to the topic at hand - "face coverings becoming mandatory in Scotland's shops". I've just had to delete some off topic posts. Thanks. :)
 

NorthOxonian

Established Member
Associate Staff
Buses & Coaches
Joined
5 Jul 2018
Messages
1,487
Location
Oxford/Newcastle
What concerns me is the lack of an "exit plan" for rules like this. The levels of infection and death in Scotland are really tiny, so it isn't as if they can say "when cases get below a certain level, we won't require masks".

Unless Nicola Sturgeon seriously expects everyone in Scotland to wear a mask in all shops until a vaccine is found - that seems like wishful thinking (and in all likelihood would see her lose re-election in 2021).
 

MattA7

Member
Joined
27 Jan 2019
Messages
473
I wonder if this applies to staff or only customers I imagine wearing a mask from 9 till 5 or through a whole shift would be very uncomfortable.
 

snookertam

Member
Joined
22 Sep 2018
Messages
779
I knew if I came into this forum I’d find people absolutely raging about this. I think they didn’t make it mandatory before as they were relying on guidance and hoping the population would play their part by complying. Sadly that doesn’t seem to be happening so they’ve made it mandatory.

If they’d made it mandatory from the start, we’d have had the complaint if heavy handedness.

As for the ‘trying to get one up in Boris’ malarky, do you really think the Scottish government would have to resort to anything like this to look better than the UK government? It’s really not much of a challenge given the way they’ve responded to this.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Top