fast up, slow down...

Discussion in 'UK Railway Discussion' started by ess, 3 Nov 2011.

Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. Old Timer

    Old Timer Established Member

    Messages:
    3,704
    Joined:
    24 Aug 2009
    Location:
    On a plane somewhere at 35,000
    Thanks Chap !

    One gets older and memory starts to fade more and more !
     
  2. Tomnick

    Tomnick Established Member

    Messages:
    5,149
    Joined:
    10 Jun 2005
    Not a problem :) .
     
  3. Philip Elliott

    Philip Elliott Member

    Messages:
    768
    Joined:
    9 Feb 2009
    What happens at Aylesbury is of no relevance to the GCR, it is on the Metropolitan railway.
     
  4. Eagle

    Eagle Established Member

    Messages:
    7,106
    Joined:
    20 Feb 2011
    Location:
    Leamingrad / Blanfrancisco
    Not true; it was part of the Met and GC joint line, and the National Rail mileposts are definitely counting from Manchester Piccadilly (formerly London Road).
     
  5. Tomnick

    Tomnick Established Member

    Messages:
    5,149
    Joined:
    10 Jun 2005
    Although Aylesbury is undoubtedly Met/GC Joint, Quail shows that the mileage between Quainton Road and the LUL boundary at Harrow-on-the-Hill is measured from Baker Street, even on the NR section north of Amersham. North of Quainton Road and south of Harrow-on-the-Hill though, the mileage is from Manchester London Road. Is the mileage definitely the latter, even through Aylesbury?
     
  6. Eagle

    Eagle Established Member

    Messages:
    7,106
    Joined:
    20 Feb 2011
    Location:
    Leamingrad / Blanfrancisco
    Not sure now actually. I always thought that LUL used the Ongar system for mileages anyway (basically, the Central line measures from Ongar, and all other lines take their mileage from wherever they interchange with it).

    EDIT You're right, the Manchester-based system is dropped over the parts that used to be joint. Look at MCJ.
     
  7. sidmouth

    sidmouth Member

    Messages:
    197
    Joined:
    11 Aug 2010
    Location:
    Peterborough
    Re up and down; the up direction was always towards the then railway companys' HQ. Thus Midland Railway up towards Derby.
     
  8. Welshman

    Welshman Established Member

    Messages:
    2,747
    Joined:
    11 Mar 2010
    To return to the OP's question of why are there no platforms on the Wakefield line at Ravensthorpe, I suspect the reason may be historical.

    The Leeds line was owned by the LNWR, running originally from Manchester Exchange to Leeds City, and its station now known as "Ravensthorpe" was originally called "Ravensthorpe & Thornhill". However, the Wakefield line was the extension of the LYR from Manchester Victoria to Normanton and had its own station called "Thornhill" a little further down the line towards Wakefield, so presumably the L&Y saw no need to duplicate the facilities at Ravensthorpe & Thornhill.
     
    Last edited: 4 Nov 2011
  9. barrykas

    barrykas Established Member

    Messages:
    1,579
    Joined:
    19 Sep 2006
    Looking at the "Baseline Capability" extract from the Sectional Appendix on the NR site, the GC mileages apply as far as Harrow South Jn (or thereabouts), LU kilometreage applies to Mantles Wood, from where mileage from Baker Street applies to Quainton Road, where GC mileage picks up again to Calvert Junction.

    Cheers,

    Barry
     
  10. Railsigns

    Railsigns Established Member

    Messages:
    1,764
    Joined:
    15 Feb 2010
    Another myth. While that was true for some companies, it wasn't the case for all.
     
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.

Share This Page