When I perused the NR blurb on the project, there was no mention of those two bridges, so I assumed that they didn't need altering. Why would they do the others and not these, if they do need raising? Church Road would be a mammoth job if it did need raising. I would have thought Constable Road was well high enough above the rails? I also presumed the ex-MR bridge south of Easton Road didn't need doing. What about that one? I don't see any mention about that.
Different bridges, different solutions...
Bonnington Walk, brick-built, sufficiently high above the rails, parapets raised by 4 courses one side and 5 courses the other, work completed during 2016.
Constable Rd, iron parapets, definitely need raising to be electrification-ready, deck concrete or iron..? It looks to me that to make the parapets comply with current standards (no pun intended), it becomes either worthwhile, practical or necessary to replace the whole deck at the same time, particularly if it can be considered to be 'life-expired'... Planned work currently suspended..
Easton Road, new pre-cast plinths, decks, parapets, work completed over approx 12 months during 2016..
Midland Railway ('Cycle Path') bridge, parapets raised during 2016..
Church Road (Lawrence Hill) bridge.. Not sure what work required to be electrification-ready, but it was scheduled to follow on from Easton Road and Ducie Road closures and diversions..
Ducie Road.. Not sure what work was required, but it was completed during 2016 deck concrete or ironneed