TheGrandWazoo
Veteran Member
People keep banging on about how the likes of First and Stagecoach can survive because they're "big" companies, however the reality is that without funding they wouldn't be able to provide any bus service in a few weeks time as there simply wouldn't be the money to pay drivers and fuel up vehicles! Obviously it's far from ideal to be having a hourly service but what more can you expect when bus use is so low and why should operators provide a unrealistic higher frequency just to please those who have poor time management, if you miss the bus that's your own fault!
Even with the revised timetables coming in tomorrow Glasgow will still have a far better level of service when compared to most other cities!
You're absolutely right about the first and final parts of that. Glasgow is still getting a better service provision than many other places
Having an hourly service is obviously not ideal. Not convinced it's poor time management though - that seems a little harsh . Large organisations like the NHS will have a range of finishing times that ordinarily are catered for (and at this time, may even be more fluid than normal if you're having to cover for staff that are self isolating). If you finish at 17:30 and the hourly bus is at 17:45, you'll be fine with that. If you finish at 18:00 and the hourly bus is at 18:45, that's when people tweet. It's unfortunate but these are the days we are living in. You could run half hourly so there's an 18:15 departure but all you're doing is probably doubling your costs and getting the same revenue (and they are losing money anyway).
I think First Glasgow and the the bus industry in general is doing a bloody decent job given the challenges. I had to do the weekly shop at Tesco's earlier and saw 6 buses (2 Streetlites, 2 Eclipses, 2 Solos) on a mix of tendered and commercial work. Total passengers - 2