The report is based on an analysis of the Stint itself, much (if not all) of which was omitted from apparently any study prior to the Stint being admitted into service.
That seems to be correct. When the Stint vehicle was first presented to the government, it obviously wasn't a bike but it wasn't a car or a van either. Nobody could quite figure out which regulations should apply, just like had been the case with Segway vehicles not long before.
They felt like they shouldn't get in the way of innovation, so the minister decided to classify the Stint as a "special moped" to which only limited regulations applied.
There is nothing contained within the report that relates to events that contributed to the tragic accident on 20th September, there may be more questions arising from the report of the accident investigators in due course.
That's correct.
TNO have only focused on the Stint vehicle itself, the investigation into the accident at Oss is being performed by the police and the NFI (Dutch Forensics Institute). The Stint vehicle involved in that accident is still with the NFI for research and testing.
I am not at all sure that it will be both possible and economic to bring any existing Stint up to the standards outlined in the report which, quite frankly, seem at this stage to be quite general in many respects.
The second document on TNO's website contains the issues which TNO have recognised ("Probleempunten") and their proposed improvements ("Verbetervoorstellen"). Some of them are fairly simple and easily implemented. For example: TNO suggest to place a rear-view mirror on the steering column, fitting the units with saddles to prevent the driver falling off, and adding some reflectors and brake indicator lights.
TNO have only looked at the Stint model for BSO (buitenschoolse opvang, daycare for kids). They haven't looked into other Stint types, such as the ones used by PostNL (mail transport), various city councils (light maintenance) and the custom models.
In my view, those Stints could be cleared again for use on the road as they are used by just 1 person (the driver/handler) and are not used to carry kids. Should a 'runaway' incident happen again, those drivers can simply hop off their vehicle and get themselves to safety without having to evacuate up to 10 children.
Re-allowing those Stint vehicles would give the Stintum company some income again, so they can focus on getting their vehicles adjusted and re-certified for their BSO use.