• Our booking engine at tickets.railforums.co.uk (powered by TrainSplit) helps support the running of the forum with every ticket purchase! Find out more and ask any questions/give us feedback in this thread!

Freight Train Derailment near Ely 14/08/17

Status
Not open for further replies.

Class 92

Member
Joined
12 May 2011
Messages
382
Anyone know if any EMT 156s/158s are stuck the wrong side of the block?

I saw an image taken at Norwich earlier today of two 158s in the sidings there, so imagine they're trapped. One of the units is 158780, not sure about rear one.
 
Sponsor Post - registered members do not see these adverts; click here to register, or click here to log in
R

RailUK Forums

ac6000cw

Established Member
Joined
10 May 2014
Messages
3,121
Location
Cambridge, UK
I saw an image taken at Norwich earlier today of two 158s in the sidings there, so imagine they're trapped. One of the units is 158780, not sure about rear one.

It's only Ely - March that's blocked (not the whole East Anglian rail system), so I'd be surprised if they couldn't move them to Peterborough etc. if they really needed to. Some 158s 'overnight' at Norwich anyway (AFAIK), so I guess they may as well sit out the disruption there as anywhere else.
 

bunnahabhain

Established Member
Joined
8 Jun 2005
Messages
2,070
They'll be used for a half level of service running in fits and spurts but generally two trains every three hours supplementing the hourly GA service. Starting with the 0550 and then the 0752 (unit on hire to GA first).
 

High Dyke

Established Member
Joined
1 Jan 2013
Messages
4,267
Location
Yellabelly Country

Alfie1014

Member
Joined
27 Jun 2012
Messages
1,119
Location
Essex
Matters not being helped by defective points at Manor Park (presumably DM to I line) around Ilford flyover, 5 mph speed restriction pretty much decimated the evening peak out of Liverpool Street. GA saying likely to be similar disruption tomorrow, just adding to the woes of diverting all those liners via the GEML.
 

dk1

Veteran Member
Joined
2 Oct 2009
Messages
15,823
Location
East Anglia
I saw an image taken at Norwich earlier today of two 158s in the sidings there, so imagine they're trapped. One of the units is 158780, not sure about rear one.

Always handy having spare 158s in the Jubilee sidings for GA to spot hire & timed nicely for Cromer Carnival.
 

TheEdge

Established Member
Joined
29 Nov 2012
Messages
4,489
Location
Norwich
Always handy having spare 158s in the Jubilee sidings for GA to spot hire & timed nicely for Cromer Carnival.

Something will need to help cover for 170270 which is trapped north of the derailment.
 

dk1

Veteran Member
Joined
2 Oct 2009
Messages
15,823
Location
East Anglia
Something will need to help cover for 170270 which is trapped north of the derailment.

Assumed something was the wrong side after hearing 1350 Pbo-Ips was stopped in time. Would've thought a route conductor would've been sought down the ECML by now.
 

Crossover

Established Member
Joined
4 Jun 2009
Messages
9,247
Location
Yorkshire
6L37 Hoo Junction to Whitemoor (a Colas operated departmental working)



It's heading back from Ely to Hoo Junction tonight as 6O36



MARK

I think I spotted that one on RTT where it got to a point then ran back on itself, judging by the reporting locations and timings. Another freight did similar too I think
 

ac6000cw

Established Member
Joined
10 May 2014
Messages
3,121
Location
Cambridge, UK
Steve Hooker from Network Rail (Head of Maintenance Delivery) was on the local BBC East (west) News last night - iPlayer link, view from 08:55 onwards (it's only available for another 15 hours).

He was suggesting that since passenger trains have more sophisticated suspension (than freight trains) they would have been very much less likely to have derailed. So does this imply a track problem that was beyond the capability of the wagon suspension to deal with? It seemed an odd comment to make when immediately afterwards he said that NR was extremely keen to find out what happened i.e. that they didn't know at present.
 

westcoaster

Established Member
Joined
4 Dec 2006
Messages
4,223
Location
DTOS A or B
Steve Hooker from Network Rail (Head of Maintenance Delivery) was on the local BBC East (west) News last night - iPlayer link, view from 08:55 onwards (it's only available for another 15 hours).

He was suggesting that since passenger trains have more sophisticated suspension (than freight trains) they would have been very much less likely to have derailed. So does this imply a track problem that was beyond the capability of the wagon suspension to deal with? It seemed an odd comment to make when immediately afterwards he said that NR was extremely keen to find out what happened i.e. that they didn't know at present.

Would that be cyclic top.
 

edwin_m

Veteran Member
Joined
21 Apr 2013
Messages
24,793
Location
Nottingham
There have been several derailments over the last few years where a track twist fault combined with uneven loading of the wheels on a wagon caused either by twisted frames or by uneven loading of the wagon or containers. Either fault on its own was within spec or not far outside but in combination they could cause a derailment. Passenger trains are unlikely to have this sort of uneven loading.
 

ac6000cw

Established Member
Joined
10 May 2014
Messages
3,121
Location
Cambridge, UK
There have been several derailments over the last few years where a track twist fault combined with uneven loading of the wheels on a wagon caused either by twisted frames or by uneven loading of the wagon or containers. Either fault on its own was within spec or not far outside but in combination they could cause a derailment. Passenger trains are unlikely to have this sort of uneven loading.

I think (from memory of the accident report) that the cause of the previous Ely 'bridge wrecking' derailment was a combination of excessive track twist and out-of-spec wagon suspension.
 

Chris M

Member
Joined
4 Feb 2012
Messages
1,057
Location
London E14
Is there scope for an RAIB class investigation into freight wagon maintenance? Almost every freight derailment they've reported on (which is almost all derailments they've reported on) seems to involve frame twist and/or poorly maintained suspension.
 

hwl

Established Member
Joined
5 Feb 2012
Messages
7,354
I'd like to see the containers weighed too as the number of over declared overweight is surprising...
 

bramling

Veteran Member
Joined
5 Mar 2012
Messages
17,685
Location
Hertfordshire / Teesdale
Something will need to help cover for 170270 which is trapped north of the derailment.

170270 went via Hitchin today in the direction of Cambridge. As I write this it's between Hitchin and Letchworth.

Unusual to hear the sound of a commuter DMU in the platform at Hitchin, rarely if ever heard since the 1980s.
 
Last edited:

peperami97

Member
Joined
16 Aug 2017
Messages
12
I think I spotted that one on RTT where it got to a point then ran back on itself, judging by the reporting locations and timings. Another freight did similar too I think

Was at Ely last night and the Colas department train ran round itself around 8pm and a new member of crew wandered down to it a bit later, in preparation for heading to Hoo.

The other frieght that came up to Ely was a 66 loco sent to stress test the points near the accident, from Ipswich last night, that got as far as the goods loop and then discovered the possession which as a liner driver he wasn't allowed into.

So as we were leaving around 9 ish last night he pottered off back to Ipswich.

Ben
 

XDM

Member
Joined
9 Apr 2016
Messages
483
I'd like to see the containers weighed too as the number of over declared overweight is surprising...

How do you know the number overweight is surprising? Is the number published? Are axle loads routinely weighed in the same way hot axle boxes are detected? I have asked TOC colleagues but they are not in the freight sector. But we doubt if there is equipment on running lines to measure axle weight/wheel load.
 

TheEdge

Established Member
Joined
29 Nov 2012
Messages
4,489
Location
Norwich
170270 went via Hitchin today in the direction of Cambridge. As I write this it's between Hitchin and Letchworth.

Unusual to hear the sound of a commuter DMU in the platform at Hitchin, rarely if ever heard since the 1980s.

It did indeed, I've just prepped it for service and it's now sat in the middle road at Norwich
 

theageofthetra

On Moderation
Joined
27 May 2012
Messages
3,504
I'd like to see the containers weighed too as the number of over declared overweight is surprising...


I would like to know how much difference it makes to say a wagon full of sand dry v wet after heavy rain parked in a siding all night.
 

3973EXL

Established Member
Joined
2 Feb 2017
Messages
2,435
How do you know the number overweight is surprising? Is the number published? Are axle loads routinely weighed in the same way hot axle boxes are detected? I have asked TOC colleagues but they are not in the freight sector. But we doubt if there is equipment on running lines to measure axle weight/wheel load.



You would be wrong.

There is different equipment that can detect temperature/wheel impact/axle loads.

Has been referred to in RAIB reports of freight train derailments.
 

Dr Hoo

Established Member
Joined
10 Nov 2015
Messages
3,912
Location
Hope Valley
There is now extensive (not to say 'universal') coverage of "gotcha" wheel impact comparators on regular freight routes.

Container weighing had also been greatly tightened up internationally in recent years, to ensure proper management of weight distribution on ships amongst other things.
 

3973EXL

Established Member
Joined
2 Feb 2017
Messages
2,435
I would like to know how much difference it makes to say a wagon full of sand dry v wet after heavy rain parked in a siding all night.

Sand is not usually a problem as you reach cubic capacity before maximum carrying capacity.

Water tends to leak out as well, through hopper doors or drainage holes in box wagons. Follow the trail of sand in the four foot from Dagenham to Acton.

Spoil with a high clay content could cause a problem. If stabled for a long period so that water could build up to make the wagon overweight (unlikely) it should be picked up on train prep.

Previous RAIB reports of container train derailments have been more concerned with uneven weight distribution in 40' containers than total weight.
 

snowball

Established Member
Joined
4 Mar 2013
Messages
7,674
Location
Leeds
Press release

https://www.networkrail.co.uk/feeds...rway-to-remove-derailed-freight-train-at-ely/

Wagons are being lifted off the track with a rail crane, as a major recovery operation gets underway at the site where a freight train derailed in Ely on Monday 14 August.

A rail crane was brought in overnight on Tuesday (15 August) so that work could begin to lift the 11 derailed wagons from the tracks. Each empty wagon weighs 11 tonnes, with the heaviest container including its contents weighing 106 tonnes and each one will be carefully lifted onto the undamaged track to be towed away. The train and the wagons that stayed on the track were towed away on Tuesday afternoon.

The recovery operation is expected to take a number of days and once complete, nearly ¼ mile of track needs to be replaced. The work is scheduled to complete over the weekend and the line is expected to be open on Monday. In the meantime, the line will remain closed and passengers are urged to check before they travel.

Simon Ancona, Network Rail’s chief operating officer for Anglia, said: “We have an army of experts and specialist teams who are working day and night to remove the wagons as quickly as possible. Once they are out of the way we can replace the tracks, carry out the necessary repairs, reopen the line and get passengers on the move again. We expect to be able to reopen the line on Monday. I’d like to thank passengers for their continued patience.”

The incident affects CrossCountry, East Midlands Trains and Greater Anglia passengers. Passengers are advised to check how their journey may be affected with their train operator, or nationalrail.co.uk
 

GB

Established Member
Joined
16 Nov 2008
Messages
6,457
Location
Somewhere
Those numbers don't make much sense. To start with an empty FEA wagon is 21 tonnes not 11. Second, the plated weight for a 20ft or 40ft container is generally around the 31 ton mark.

Maximum load for an FEA is 61 tonnes.
 

tsr

Established Member
Joined
15 Nov 2011
Messages
7,400
Location
Between the parallel lines
Those numbers don't make much sense. To start with an empty FEA wagon is 21 tonnes not 11. Second, the plated weight for a 20ft or 40ft container is generally around the 31 ton mark.

Maximum load for an FEA is 61 tonnes.

Bogie weights used in error? Just a thought - not sure. Not that familiar with freight stock.
 

edwin_m

Veteran Member
Joined
21 Apr 2013
Messages
24,793
Location
Nottingham
I'd like to see the containers weighed too as the number of over declared overweight is surprising...

the heaviest container including its contents weighing 106 tonnes
(from the NR press release)

I think you may be right with that! A 106 tonne container on its own would overload any wagon. Misprint or misunderstanding in the press office I presume.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Top