thetangoman
Member
What is happening with these. Reported on another website the only 7 are in use with 11 in storage.
I'm not sure what's happening with them but if the source is abrail, I'm not entirely sure it is accurate.
On a visit to Balm Rd on 26/5, there was a line of 10
(from Balm Rd end)
70013 / 09 / 16 / 18 / 01 / 19 / 05 / 10 / 06
with
70004 and 70017 elsewhere in the depot.
70002 which is listed as stored (as it was 2 weeks ago) was out and about earning its keep on the Wednesday prior.
You mean Freightliner 70s?What is happening with these. Reported on another website the only 7 are in use with 11 in storage.
I believe 70002 has now been stored. Pic taken on Saturday shows that it's now at Leeds: https://flic.kr/p/27ZDiqL
And we still get posters insisting that Freightliner is short of traction...
Only Intermodal men and a few HH men still retain traction knowledge. Hence why you do not see them on HH jobs.Why is that. Can they not be used for work that 66's do
Only Intermodal men and a few HH men still retain traction knowledge. Hence why you do not see them on HH jobs.
The locos that have been stored for a considerable time is due to a design fault which means new bogies are required.
They are hideously expensive to operate in terms of not only routine maintenance but also leasing costs, spare parts etc.
This surely must have been known when Freightliner took on the lease? I can understand the bogie issue sidelining them but not these issues.They are hideously expensive to operate in terms of not only routine maintenance but also leasing costs, spare parts etc.
This surely must have been known when Freightliner took on the lease? I can understand the bogie issue sidelining them but not these issues.
So they are not short of traction - they are switching off operational locomotives that they do not wish to use.They are short of traction. Class 70's are not part of G&W UK's plan.
Another to be switched off in the coming days.
In regards to class 66's they are short of motive power, 70s cannot be used on any of FL's operated services.So they are not short of traction - they are switching off operational locomotives that they do not wish to use.
apart from the daily working I see both ways through MK............In regards to class 66's they are short of motive power, 70s cannot be used on any of FL's operated services.
People keep forgetting that finance wise along with everything else they are controlled by G&W. Different parent companies than when the 70's were ordered.
Its not 2010 when coal was king anymore and the class 70 fleet was justified. The Railfreight industry is becoming more cutthroat than ever and costs are always rising.
apart from the daily working I see both ways through MK............
Agreed - the company has changed hands and the freight market has changed a great deal since they were ordered.
Sorry rich that should of been all of FL's services. You won't see them on any HH job only shifting boxes or occasional route learner.
In regards to class 66's they are short of motive power,
In regards to class 66's they are short of motive power, 70s cannot be used on any of FL's operated services.
Unless a 66 can earn more money in Poland than the UK, in which case they could sacrifice work in the UK to earn more elsewhere, though I hope that is not the case.They sent another 66 off to Poland a few weeks ago which suggests that they are not short of locos.
They sent another 66 off to Poland a few weeks ago which suggests that they are not short of locos.
A 70 can haul more over A longer period of time. 70s are far advanced compared to a 66 but major design flaws prohibit the loco from being a real success.Asking as as freight engine luddite, what is the difference in capability between a Class 66 and class 70?
What is happening with these. Reported on another website the only 7 are in use with 11 in storage.
They sent another 66 off to Poland a few weeks ago which suggests that they are not short of locos.