• Our booking engine at tickets.railforums.co.uk (powered by TrainSplit) helps support the running of the forum with every ticket purchase! Find out more and ask any questions/give us feedback in this thread!

Ideas for future of displaced rolling stock

Status
Not open for further replies.

TRAX

Established Member
Joined
2 Dec 2015
Messages
1,647
Location
France
Let's not forget that South Western Railway is soon going to get rid of the 30 brand-new Class 707 EMUs.

I do wonder what future they might have, given that a lot of (new) franchises in the UK have already placed their orders for new stock (Northern, Wales & Borders, West Midlands Railway/London Northwestern Railway...).
Could the 707s actually end up with nowhere to go ?
 
Sponsor Post - registered members do not see these adverts; click here to register, or click here to log in
R

RailUK Forums

SWT_USER

Member
Joined
29 Aug 2010
Messages
869
Location
Ashford Middx
Somewhere far away from London hopefully. Not comfortable units to commute on at all compared to the 458/5's they replaced.
 

swt_passenger

Veteran Member
Joined
7 Apr 2010
Messages
31,385
Southeastern as DC units, or if fitted with pans who knows. I think we’ve had this discussion before though.
 

Domh245

Established Member
Joined
6 Apr 2013
Messages
8,426
Location
nowhere
Southeastern as DC units, or if fitted with pans who knows. I think we’ve had this discussion before though.

I don't think that they'll wind up at southeastern - Both Govia and Abellio are supposed to have offered Hitachi AT100s for metro fleet replacement, whilst stagecoach have partnered with alstom. In both cases I'd be amazed if they offered anything other than a consistent metro fleet, so they would have to be reconfigured for mainline services, but whether they'd stack up well compared to other surplus fleets or new build is a different matter.
 

swt_passenger

Veteran Member
Joined
7 Apr 2010
Messages
31,385
I don't think that they'll wind up at southeastern - Both Govia and Abellio are supposed to have offered Hitachi AT100s for metro fleet replacement, whilst stagecoach have partnered with alstom. In both cases I'd be amazed if they offered anything other than a consistent metro fleet, so they would have to be reconfigured for mainline services, but whether they'd stack up well compared to other surplus fleets or new build is a different matter.
Fair point.

Here's the last discussion by the way:
https://www.railforums.co.uk/threads/future-of-class-707.144409/
I doubt anything new will come up this time round.
 

Goldfish62

Established Member
Joined
14 Feb 2010
Messages
10,030
Some further ideas/idle speculation/downright silliness:

To Southern to replace the 455s
To EMT reconfigured internally / pantographs fitted for Corby services
Trailer coaches used to strengthen 8-car 707s and driving coaches scrapped
Diesel engines stuck under them everyone realises that the 769s won't work
Reconfigured internally and used on Portsmouth fasts when it's found that the 442s can't keep to time
Recycled as paperclips
 

MatthewRead

On Moderation
Joined
21 Nov 2014
Messages
1,636
Location
West london
Some further ideas/idle speculation/downright silliness:

To Southern to replace the 455s
To EMT reconfigured internally / pantographs fitted for Corby services
Trailer coaches used to strengthen 8-car 707s and driving coaches scrapped
Diesel engines stuck under them everyone realises that the 769s won't work
Reconfigured internally and used on Portsmouth fasts when it's found that the 442s can't keep to time
Recycled as paperclips
What about replacing Southern 313's have you not seen the state of them.
 

LeeLivery

Established Member
Joined
13 Jul 2014
Messages
1,462
Location
London
I'd be happy to have them in Southern land, would make GTR (assuming they'll survive) the only Desiro City operator.

That's the suggestion that 'feels' best, but they're 34 carriages too few, even without expanding capacity.

I don't know if it is possible for the 707s, but I say order additional carriages and lengthen them to 10 cars. Assuming most 455s are run as doubles now, the 30 707s would be more than enough to replace them. If there is enough spear 707s to cover, take some of the 377s off the suburbans and use them to replace the Coastway 313s. Again, don't know if it's possible but would be pretty good to see.
 

GW43125

Established Member
Joined
8 Dec 2014
Messages
2,047
I hope they don't go,they are quite popular with the traincrews.AFAIK.

I spoke to a guard a while back and she said that from a guard perspective, they're a dream (well, almost) to work whilst the 458s are pigs in that respect.
 

Class455

Established Member
Joined
19 May 2016
Messages
1,396
I think they could go to TL, and be used to expand the network to Caterham and Tattenham Corner, areas which would have been served under the original Thameslink programme, and since they have shorter platforms they can accommodate the 707's. I had a thought the other day that the Thameslink network could be extended to Guildford in the future, with trains running through the core and to Wimbledon, then calling at all stations from Raynes Park to Guildford via the New Guildford Line. Perhaps 707's could well be used for that
 

D365

Veteran Member
Joined
29 Jun 2012
Messages
11,449
Bolstering Thameslink's 700 fleet would seem most sensible in my opinion considering the fleets are (almost) identical.

Emphasis on the ‘almost’. Mechanically they are very different.
 

edwin_m

Veteran Member
Joined
21 Apr 2013
Messages
24,884
Location
Nottingham
Emphasis on the ‘almost’. Mechanically they are very different.
Curious. Apart from obviously being shorter, what else is different? I would have thought Siemens would make the minimum modification to their standard design to meet the requirements of a new customer.
 

Domh245

Established Member
Joined
6 Apr 2013
Messages
8,426
Location
nowhere
I think it's mainly the installed power (both in terms of ratings of motors and also number of motor vehicles) that differs.
 

D9009Spotter

Member
Joined
14 Sep 2013
Messages
39
Some further ideas/idle speculation/downright silliness:

To Southern to replace the 455s
To EMT reconfigured internally / pantographs fitted for Corby services
Trailer coaches used to strengthen 8-car 707s and driving coaches scrapped
Diesel engines stuck under them everyone realises that the 769s won't work
Reconfigured internally and used on Portsmouth fasts when it's found that the 442s can't keep to time
Recycled as paperclips
Roast me if you will but couldn't they go up to Northern to the Leeds area or even to ScotRail? Procided these franchises both think that the 'older stock' is too dated? Seems to be a current trend is all.
 

JonathanH

Veteran Member
Joined
29 May 2011
Messages
18,756
Some further ideas/idle speculation/downright silliness:

To Southern to replace the 455s

That's the suggestion that 'feels' best, but they're 34 carriages too few, even without expanding capacity.

Displacing Southern 377s back to London to Sussex Coast services to run more 12-car trains would be a better option than replacing 455s
 

Malcolmffc

Member
Joined
19 Mar 2017
Messages
300
They will be wthdrawn and then handed to Vivarail to be marketed as “new trains”
 

Goldfish62

Established Member
Joined
14 Feb 2010
Messages
10,030
Roast me if you will but couldn't they go up to Northern to the Leeds area or even to ScotRail? Procided these franchises both think that the 'older stock' is too dated? Seems to be a current trend is all.
Yes, valid points. Then again the GA 379s and c2c 387s which already have pantographs and toilets need to find homes.
 

physics34

Established Member
Joined
1 Dec 2013
Messages
3,696
Yes, valid points. Then again the GA 379s and c2c 387s which already have pantographs and toilets need to find homes.
There was talk of Southern becoming an all Electrostar franchise. Watch this space i guess. Renember the 377/5s at Southeastern are still currently sub leased from Southern.
 

rebmcr

Established Member
Joined
15 Nov 2011
Messages
3,849
Location
St Neots
Yes, valid points. Then again the GA 379s and c2c 387s which already have pantographs and toilets need to find homes.

I have a feeling the 387s will be staying put at c2c for much longer than originally announced.
 

Domh245

Established Member
Joined
6 Apr 2013
Messages
8,426
Location
nowhere
I have a feeling the 387s will be staying put at c2c for much longer than originally announced.
They are staying until their AVENTRAs arrive, which is later than originally announced but I don't see why they would need to start beyond that. After that, GN or GWR would be likely to snap them up
 

mic505

Member
Joined
26 Nov 2016
Messages
186
Export them to Thailand, lol. Or instead the 5-car 360/2's from Crossrail.
 

swt_passenger

Veteran Member
Joined
7 Apr 2010
Messages
31,385
I think they could go to TL, and be used to expand the network to Caterham and Tattenham Corner, areas which would have been served under the original Thameslink programme, and since they have shorter platforms they can accommodate the 707's.
There were valid reasons for not serving Cat/Tat, so which other services would you replace? No-one is going to be increasing the number of trains through the core anytime soon,
I had a thought the other day that the Thameslink network could be extended to Guildford in the future, with trains running through the core and to Wimbledon, then calling at all stations from Raynes Park to Guildford via the New Guildford Line. Perhaps 707's could well be used for that
How the heck do your up trains get from Raynes Park to Wimbledon P9? A flat crossing of the SWML fasts and the down slow? There were presumably pretty good reasons for Thameslink (as foreseen 10 years ago) dropping Guildford via Sutton, I cannot think of any valid reason to reinstate it, never mind run via Raynes Park?
 

mushroomchow

Member
Joined
14 Feb 2017
Messages
455
Location
Where HSTs Still Scream. Kind of.
It'd make sense for them to end up on the Corby services, especially as they're mechanically almost identical to the 700s Thameslink operate and maintenance agreements could be reached.

Won't happen for as long as the DfT continue to insist on "intercity specification" stock matching the current 222s for the route, though. That's the primary reason given for it not having been absorbed into the Thameslink franchise, after all.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Top