G4S to buy ISS?

Discussion in 'UK Railway Discussion' started by 142094, 31 Oct 2011.

Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. 142094

    142094 Established Member

    Messages:
    8,778
    Joined:
    7 Nov 2009
    Location:
    Newcastle
    This article suggests that G4S, who do some work for various TOCs scuh as Northern, could buy ISS.
     
  2. Registered users do not see these banners - join or log in today!

    Rail Forums

     
  3. wintonian

    wintonian Established Member

    Messages:
    4,889
    Joined:
    15 Jan 2010
    Location:
    Hampshire
    Personally in my experience of G4S (mainly off the railway) I think the cleaning industry is far more suited to them.
     
  4. 185

    185 Established Member

    Messages:
    3,581
    Joined:
    29 Aug 2010
    Location:
    Mess room, asleep
    I wonder if ISS could give Northern's G4S staff a deep clean? ;)

    In all fairness everyone slates the G4S lads, however the grief they put up with, and the problems they prevent aren't seen by many people. Their boss on the other hand really is a class A plonker.
     
  5. lyesbkz

    lyesbkz Member

    Messages:
    585
    Joined:
    1 Dec 2010
    Location:
    Sheffield
    At first I thought G4S were buying an International Space Station to spy on people with thousands of CCTV cameras. :D
     
  6. ANorthernGuard

    ANorthernGuard Established Member

    Messages:
    2,562
    Joined:
    8 Oct 2010
    They would still make a complete mess of that as well <D
     
  7. WestCoast

    WestCoast Established Member

    Messages:
    5,253
    Joined:
    19 Jun 2010
    Location:
    Chorlton, Manchester
    Something I discovered recently is that G4S now operate airport security at two major European airports. :o
     
  8. Paul Sidorczuk

    Paul Sidorczuk Veteran Member

    Messages:
    24,578
    Joined:
    17 Apr 2011
    Location:
    The most select part of rural Cheshire East.
    The British rail business of G4S is not the "be-all and "end-all" of the total G4S global marketing structure that many forum members connect it with. You would be surprised to find out how diverse their divisions are. They even have a division that employs former Gurkha soldiers in a close-protection division that operate in many trouble-spots of the world and in the matter of embassy protection, in which some of these men have died. I would not imagine a rebuke to such men about their professionalism would be very well received.
     
  9. ANorthernGuard

    ANorthernGuard Established Member

    Messages:
    2,562
    Joined:
    8 Oct 2010
    Maybe not Paul my friend but as someone who works close to alot of these so called barrier staff, some are very good lads and pretty knowledgable, however the majority are poorly paid, poorly trained people with absolutely zero people skills.
     
  10. MidnightFlyer

    MidnightFlyer Veteran Member

    Messages:
    12,786
    Joined:
    16 May 2010
    Indeed. As a security company I'm sure they're good, but as a gateline crew they are awful, truly awful.
     
  11. hairyhandedfool

    hairyhandedfool Established Member

    Messages:
    8,838
    Joined:
    14 Apr 2008
    That's right, they transport prisoners too!
     
  12. WestCoast

    WestCoast Established Member

    Messages:
    5,253
    Joined:
    19 Jun 2010
    Location:
    Chorlton, Manchester
    They have many divisions and their specialist skill is obviously security, which they seem to be completely competent at.

    However, how good they are at training and supervising gateline staff (with the need to have a clear grasp of the ticketing system) under contract to Northern is highly debatable. I think there is a strong opinion that it would be preferable if Northern employed gateline and RPI staff directly, as opposed to contracting it out.
     
  13. tbtc

    tbtc Veteran Member

    Messages:
    14,874
    Joined:
    16 Dec 2008
    Location:
    Sheffield
    I agree - I wouldn't want the hassle of dealing with all that without getting decent money (though I presume that G4S staff at barriers are on (low) "security" wages rather than (higher) "railway" wages (?)

    Then again, not a lot of people appreciate what Serco do elsewhere in the country - prisons/ asylum camps/ electronic tagging of offenders/ military support/ IT/ leisure centre management...

    These days its about managing things, whether those things are trains/ prisoners...

    Such is the modern diversified world
     
  14. wintonian

    wintonian Established Member

    Messages:
    4,889
    Joined:
    15 Jan 2010
    Location:
    Hampshire
    weren't they in line (don't know if they submitted a tender or not) to run one of these private prisons? :o
     
  15. Minilad

    Minilad Established Member

    Messages:
    4,277
    Joined:
    26 Feb 2011
    Location:
    Anywhere B link goes
    They run Winson Green prison in Birmingham
     
  16. Paul Sidorczuk

    Paul Sidorczuk Veteran Member

    Messages:
    24,578
    Joined:
    17 Apr 2011
    Location:
    The most select part of rural Cheshire East.
    It might be interesting for forum members to see what G4S actually do world-wide by accessing their corporate website.
     
  17. MidnightFlyer

    MidnightFlyer Veteran Member

    Messages:
    12,786
    Joined:
    16 May 2010
    I am sure many on here are well aware of that, but it is their dealings as gateline staff that annoy many of us.
     
  18. Lampshade

    Lampshade Established Member

    Messages:
    3,556
    Joined:
    3 Sep 2009
    Location:
    South London
    The higher cost of employing people with the correct training/knowledge would surely be offset by the amount of extra revenue they'd catch that otherwise walked away.
     
  19. WestCoast

    WestCoast Established Member

    Messages:
    5,253
    Joined:
    19 Jun 2010
    Location:
    Chorlton, Manchester
    Yes, but large firms like G4S quite often perform to a different standard in the various branches of their business, under the supervision of a different set of management, perhaps with a different set of values and strategies. No doubt G4S excel in some of their divisions, but whether or not that standard of excellence is delivered in their ticket inspection and gateline division is open to debate.

    Virgin Group, as a large conglomerate, operate Virgin Trains in a very different way to Virgin Atlantic Airways. Obviously, the brand has a reputation to maintain, but I feel it does not detract from the issue here.
     
  20. wintonian

    wintonian Established Member

    Messages:
    4,889
    Joined:
    15 Jan 2010
    Location:
    Hampshire
    and it's some of their dealings in the security industry that annoy some of us.
     
  21. jon0844

    jon0844 Veteran Member

    Messages:
    23,046
    Joined:
    1 Feb 2009
    Location:
    UK
    Most of them actually get to their destination without escaping too.

    The thing I hate about some of these companies, the likes of Capita, Serco, Veolia, G4S or whatever (but I'm not talking necessarily talking about any one of them here), is the fact that they can bid for almost any contract (not always within their current expertise) and promise the world - then outsource the work, or use existing staff (even though they've put in the tender that they'll allocate nnn staff to the contract - knowing that it can't easily be checked).

    They seem to work on the basis that they can bid first and then work out how to do the job after. They've got the power to bid lower, when other companies have the actual knowledge and expertise in that field - but don't stand a chance of winning.

    By looking at their websites, or other sources (including Wikipedia) you can see how big these companies have grown in a relatively short space of time.
     
    Last edited: 31 Oct 2011
  22. Nym

    Nym Established Member

    Messages:
    8,032
    Joined:
    2 Mar 2007
    Location:
    Somewhere, not in London
    Well, just look at what happened with MITE for that, came out of nowhere, outbid everyone else on contracts, put more managers and less staff in and payed all the staff less.
     
  23. Paul Sidorczuk

    Paul Sidorczuk Veteran Member

    Messages:
    24,578
    Joined:
    17 Apr 2011
    Location:
    The most select part of rural Cheshire East.
    With regard to existing staff, are not any company bound by the TUPE regulations to ensure that existing staff are given the first choice to be employed on any new change of employer takeover of contract?
     
  24. jon0844

    jon0844 Veteran Member

    Messages:
    23,046
    Joined:
    1 Feb 2009
    Location:
    UK
    It depends on what the contract is. If, say, a council is outsourcing maintenance to another company - then it's a new deal and the new company will provide staff/contractors.

    If they're simply getting another company to run the existing services, most staff (usually not management) are covered by TUPE - but we all know that there are many tricks to getting people to leave, like changing contracts and requiring people accept them (or leave), or relocating and effectively forcing people to leave.

    As said above, what can happen for contracts where whoever runs things will do so with contractors, not full time members of staff, is hire the same people that worked for another company - but for less money. And then get these people to work for multiple contracts, even if the contract stipulates that there must be xx number of people allocated to a job. How does anyone easily check?
     
  25. DazDude

    DazDude Member

    Messages:
    34
    Joined:
    8 Dec 2010
    Yup pretty much about sums it up and that's barely even half of it (As I work for them...)
     
  26. AlterEgo

    AlterEgo Veteran Member

    Messages:
    11,241
    Joined:
    30 Dec 2008
    Location:
    Milton Keynes
    BBC are reporting that G4S have pulled out after shareholder opposition, and that the acquisition will no longer go ahead.
     
  27. Paul Sidorczuk

    Paul Sidorczuk Veteran Member

    Messages:
    24,578
    Joined:
    17 Apr 2011
    Location:
    The most select part of rural Cheshire East.
    Is anyone on this forum really surprised by this decision by G4S not to proceed, considering the following:-

    1)...International Shareholder Services who act for many classes of shareholders told their members that they would not be advising acceptance of this matter.

    2)...Two of the largest financial bodies such as the fund managers Artemis & Schroders and Parvus Asset Management were against these proposals.

    3)...The sudden fall in the share price of G4S since the announcement of the proposed acquisition of ISS that would be funded by a £2 billion issue of new shares to be issued through a rights issue, notwithstanding the deal would have meant the transfer of ISS debt liabilities.
     
  28. Nym

    Nym Established Member

    Messages:
    8,032
    Joined:
    2 Mar 2007
    Location:
    Somewhere, not in London
    I only know from what happened with a cleaning contract in a North West airport, one of the other fun things MITIE did was scrap all the inital equipment, lease lods of brand new stuff, and then return it after their 6 month contract evaluation, leaving one ride on floor cleaner per terminal rather than four that they started with.

    Then they re-contracted all the staff down to minimum wage (from about £7.80/hour) replaced all the managment, lost all of their additional internal contracts (thanks to being arsey abou them) and are now loosing money on it again because they can't meet quality standards, but can't be sacked from it.

    Fun thing is, Inital still have managment on site because they do aircraft cleaning, as does ISS, Dawsons, and OCS....
     
  29. Paul Sidorczuk

    Paul Sidorczuk Veteran Member

    Messages:
    24,578
    Joined:
    17 Apr 2011
    Location:
    The most select part of rural Cheshire East.
    Would you think that Northern Rail as part of their contract stipulation have to ensure that adherence to the terms of the contract are being met by G4S. If so many of our forum members and of the other rail staff who also see the shortcomings of the training and supervision, I am sure that Northern Rail are also aware of this situation. Is there any clause in the Northern Rail contract with G4S that can lead to financial penalties for non-adherence and in extreme cases of non-adherence, for the termination of the contract itself?

    The good news is that G4S have now withdrawn from the ISS situation.
     
  30. Darandio

    Darandio Established Member

    Messages:
    6,436
    Joined:
    24 Feb 2007
    Location:
    Redcar
  31. blacknight

    blacknight Member

    Messages:
    543
    Joined:
    19 Feb 2009
    Location:
    Crow Park
    Personnally I would like to see back end to both these companies & others being sub contracted to working on railways.
    TOC's would not be making 182 millions in profit if it were bound by DfT to employ staff directly. Maybe the192k per annum could be reallocated for 2012 budget, it would go along way to paying wages of gateline staff & directly employed cleaning staff;).
     
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.

Share This Page