• Our booking engine at tickets.railforums.co.uk (powered by TrainSplit) helps support the running of the forum with every ticket purchase! Find out more and ask any questions/give us feedback in this thread!

Glasgow Queen Street refurbishment and remodelling

Status
Not open for further replies.
Sponsor Post - registered members do not see these adverts; click here to register, or click here to log in
R

RailUK Forums

NotATrainspott

Established Member
Joined
2 Feb 2013
Messages
3,224
Sainbsurys is right next door to the station.

It's in the building being demolished to make way for the new concourse, so it's not going to be particularly useful.

There's a small newsagent across the taxi rank from Sainsbury's. Buchanan Street and its array of various retailers is a few dozen metres away as well, so it's not going to be the end of the world.
 

marks87

Established Member
Joined
23 Jun 2010
Messages
1,609
Location
Dundee
There's another Sainsbury's 5 minute's walk away on Bath Street.

But I'd be surprised if a little space wasn't found for a basic WH Smith - papers, snacks and a chiller.
 

cf111

Established Member
Joined
13 Nov 2012
Messages
1,348
There's another Sainsbury's 5 minute's walk away on Bath Street.

But I'd be surprised if a little space wasn't found for a basic WH Smith - papers, snacks and a chiller.

The wee one on the way to the low-level platforms might stay open.
 

Mikey1984

Member
Joined
22 Sep 2012
Messages
15
Couple of questions:
Am I right in thinking the gantrys are going in but not wires for electrification?

How does the services diverted through QS low level affect existing services. Also how does it work when they can't terminate at those platforms?
 

Philip Phlopp

Established Member
Joined
31 May 2015
Messages
3,004
Couple of questions:
Am I right in thinking the gantrys are going in but not wires for electrification?

I don't know if they're going to do everything between trainshed and the tunnel mouth at the same time as the closure, but there should be some work with the ROC to wire conversion elements, tensioners etc.

The platforms themselves are planned to be wired after the platform alterations occur, so there will be access available for further wiring works, putting in portals, TTCs etc would depend on whether there are signal sighting issues to resolve first.
 

jopsuk

Veteran Member
Joined
13 May 2008
Messages
12,773
It would make no sense to put the wires up before the platforms are altered and lengthened.

And it isn't all being done at once as the station concourse will almost certainly be an important access route for the works throughout the blockade. It would be a bit awkward if that was blocked by demolition and building works- not to mention that part will still be access to the low level
 

marks87

Established Member
Joined
23 Jun 2010
Messages
1,609
Location
Dundee
It would make no sense to put the wires up before the platforms are altered and lengthened.

And it isn't all being done at once as the station concourse will almost certainly be an important access route for the works throughout the blockade. It would be a bit awkward if that was blocked by demolition and building works- not to mention that part will still be access to the low level
Low Level is accessed away from the main concourse via entrances on Dundas Street and North Hanover Street. The only issue is the lifts (accessed from P7).
 

londonboi198o5

On Moderation
Joined
28 Dec 2010
Messages
449
Just had a little look at the planned blockade on Glasgow queen street high level planned closure website

Seems quite a few trains are going to br diverted to Glasgow central. Having used Glasgow central in peak it is a very very busy station with allot of trains coming in and out constantly. It is rather interesting to see how they plan to fit the extra services in to the already busy Glasgow central station with paths and trains coming along the lines via Cumbernauld.

Also of interest is the Oban fort William and mallaig services will be starting and terminating on the through low level platforms I imagine this will cause a few delays to the current services and extra services that will go through the low level platforms due to the passengers boarding and leaving these services. Also how do they plan to reverse the trains out of the low level as there is no cross over there will the trains run ecs from sprinburn into the platforms ????

Be interesting to see how it all goes to plan hope some people on here can take some nice pictures of the diversions and the class 170 at Glasgow central :D
 

Dryce

Member
Joined
25 May 2015
Messages
151
Also how do they plan to reverse the trains out of the low level as there is no cross over there will the trains run ecs from sprinburn into the platforms ????

AIUI they will arrive from Oban/Fort William via Anniesland and depart via Springburn.

ECS movements are in the same direction - arriving from Eastfield or Corkerhill via Anniesland for outbound services and departing via Springburn after inbound services.

They seem to be avoiding reversals at GLQ LL and basically using Cowlairs -Anniesland - GLQ LL - Springburn - Cowlairs as a large loop - with some services such as those to/from Alloa using it clockwise and Edinburgh via Falkirk High and WHL services using it anti-clockwise.
 

scotraildriver

Established Member
Joined
15 Jun 2009
Messages
1,628
AIUI they will arrive from Oban/Fort William via Anniesland and depart via Springburn.

ECS movements are in the same direction - arriving from Eastfield or Corkerhill via Anniesland for outbound services and departing via Springburn after inbound services.

They seem to be avoiding reversals at GLQ LL and basically using Cowlairs -Anniesland - GLQ LL - Springburn - Cowlairs as a large loop - with some services such as those to/from Alloa using it clockwise and Edinburgh via Falkirk High and WHL services using it anti-clockwise.

This is correct apart from the 05.20 Qn St/Oban which will depart via Anniesland ahead of the sleeper. There is no facility to reverse at Queen St LL.
 

Markos72

Member
Joined
25 Jun 2012
Messages
54
We were given a handout detailing the works taking place,which include new signals and points in the tunnel and station area,as well as the installation of new axle counters( a type myself and none of my colleagues have yet been trained on.)
Should be fun with the first axle counter failure-if you haven't been trained on it you can't work on it...
 

route:oxford

Established Member
Joined
1 Nov 2008
Messages
4,949
They seem to be avoiding reversals at GLQ LL and basically using Cowlairs -Anniesland - GLQ LL - Springburn - Cowlairs as a large loop - with some services such as those to/from Alloa using it clockwise and Edinburgh via Falkirk High and WHL services using it anti-clockwise.

Got to wonder, if that had been considered in the olden days at the time of Beeching, whether Glasgow Queen Street upper could have been closed and sold off as a hotel or car park with all services looping around a four-platform lower.

(Is a reversal required for Aberdeen services to reach Central?)
 

LNW-GW Joint

Veteran Member
Joined
22 Feb 2011
Messages
19,685
Location
Mold, Clwyd
Got to wonder, if that had been considered in the olden days at the time of Beeching, whether Glasgow Queen Street upper could have been closed and sold off as a hotel or car park with all services looping around a four-platform lower.

(Is a reversal required for Aberdeen services to reach Central?)

No, straight in via Cumbernauld, Coatbridge Central, Carmyle and Rutherglen.
Single track lead to reach the Carmyle line though, which doesn't help.

Presumably all the underground steam/diesel fumes prevented a QSt HL closure in the 1960s, unlike at Buchanan St, St Enoch and Princes St.
Funny how "LMS" stations/routes bore the brunt of those closures...
 

deltic08

On Moderation
Joined
26 Aug 2013
Messages
2,718
Location
North
Got to wonder, if that had been considered in the olden days at the time of Beeching, whether Glasgow Queen Street upper could have been closed and sold off as a hotel or car park with all services looping around a four-platform lower.

(Is a reversal required for Aberdeen services to reach Central?)

Immediately post WW2 plans were made for a combined station between Buchanan St and Queen St stations whilst the land was all railway owned. Seven platforms at Queen St will never be enough for growth over the next ten years. Another twin track bore is required on the east side of the current one and more platforms on the car park.

Big mistake to close Buchanan St and sell the huge amount of railway owned land.
 
Last edited by a moderator:

PaxVobiscum

Established Member
Joined
4 Feb 2012
Messages
2,397
Location
Glasgow
I had a wee gander at Cowlairs for myself, and for all we are being told that the Cowlairs Tunnel works are separate from EGIP there are a number of overlaps becoming evident apart from any EGIP work being undertaken in the station itself.

During the period of the closure it seems there are two overbridges for the chop downhill from Cowlairs South junction - OB 123 (Fountainwells footpath which used to provide access to the Shighthill (sorry, Freudian slip :)) flats from Keppochhill Road) and OB 121 (Gourlay Street). A depot has been established at the side of the line where one of the high flats used to be and this will provide at grade access to the line and the tunnel from the top end.

The Fountainwells bridge will be replaced eventually according to the notice (photo below) but the Gourlay Street one will be replaced by a pipe bridge according to www.egip.info:
At Gourlay Street we propose to remove the existing bridge (OB 121) deck and replace with a pipe bridge to continue to carry the services/utilities across the railway. Work is scheduled to start in April 2016 for four months.

There's a picture of the depot already on the Railscot news section.
 

Attachments

  • Fountainwell Bridge Works.jpg
    Fountainwell Bridge Works.jpg
    66.9 KB · Views: 74
Last edited:

route:oxford

Established Member
Joined
1 Nov 2008
Messages
4,949
Immediately post WW2 plans were made for a combined station between Buchanan St and Queen St stations whilst the land was all railway owned. Seven platforms at Queen St will never be enough for growth over the next ten years. Another twin track bore is required on the east side of the current one and more platforms on the car park.

Big mistake to close Buchanan St and sell the huge amount of railway owned land.

Before and what should have happened after.

UG_big_glasgow_1951_existing_queen_.jpg


UG_big_glasgow_1951_proposed_north_.jpg
 

jopsuk

Veteran Member
Joined
13 May 2008
Messages
12,773
Interesting maps! If those plans had come to fruition the move to DMUs would I guess have seen the carriage sheds and turntable removed for redevelopment and the tunnel restored
 

deltic08

On Moderation
Joined
26 Aug 2013
Messages
2,718
Location
North
Amazing. If only. First time I have seen these maps but have heard about the proposal for some time. Thank you.
 

edwin_m

Veteran Member
Joined
21 Apr 2013
Messages
24,925
Location
Nottingham
Interchange between the combined station and the low level would have been a rather long walk or a slightly shorter walk and one stop on the Subway.
 

PaxVobiscum

Established Member
Joined
4 Feb 2012
Messages
2,397
Location
Glasgow
Someone's collected the TVMs at Queen Street already. :)
 

Attachments

  • TVM_0.jpg
    TVM_0.jpg
    157.2 KB · Views: 138

PaxVobiscum

Established Member
Joined
4 Feb 2012
Messages
2,397
Location
Glasgow
...and bad news - the pub is now shut

...but here's the new beer tent!
 

Attachments

  • pub.jpg
    pub.jpg
    118.8 KB · Views: 133
  • tent.jpg
    tent.jpg
    121.6 KB · Views: 126

gsnedders

Established Member
Joined
6 Sep 2015
Messages
1,472
The ticket barriers at the North Hannover Street entrance to Low-Level were gone yesterday evening, with a human-barrier in place instead.
 

ld0595

Member
Joined
1 Aug 2014
Messages
572
Location
Glasgow
Well that's it closed now! We'll see what tomorrow and more importantly, Monday brings.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Top