GN Class 717

Discussion in 'Traction & Rolling Stock' started by choochoochoo, 1 May 2017.

  1. TheDavibob

    TheDavibob Member

    Messages:
    276
    Joined:
    10 Oct 2016
    Worth bearing in mind that the 700s were still having teething issues (if I recall correctly) when the 707s were introduced, though both seem to be pretty much trouble-free now. Were the 707 problems software based?

    EDIT: Also, I hadn't really clocked that these will have a white front, essentially I just assumed all images were black and white, or the yellow hadn't been added. I have no problem with no yellow front, but these are the oddest I've seen, they look a little like a ghost, somehow.
     
    Last edited: 13 Mar 2018
  2. jellybaby

    jellybaby Member

    Messages:
    98
    Joined:
    27 Dec 2012
    That's one of the benefits since there isn't a lot of passenger unusable space where the middle cabs of the 313s are.

    When there are service disruptions and as a result very crowded trains it isn't unusual for people to enter the middle cabs. Some drivers refuse to move until people leave while others either don't notice or turn a blind eye.
     
  3. Domh245

    Domh245 Established Member

    Messages:
    4,483
    Joined:
    6 Apr 2013
    Location:
    Wolverhampton
    From memory, the 707s problems were almost entirely software based, and whilst the 700s had largely settled down, it was suggested that there wasn't that much commonality between the problems that were being faced by the two fleets, nor that much commonality between their software. It certainly doesn't disprove my point I was trying to make of just because things are similar means that they'll be need less testing and have a smoother entry into service.

    All entirely valid points, although I meant it in the context of the the rest of the train beyond the passenger saloon. All of the modern long fixed formation EMUs are really just two shorter ones with cabs at one end, ganways at the otheri, permanently coupled together
     
  4. jellybaby

    jellybaby Member

    Messages:
    98
    Joined:
    27 Dec 2012
    Aha, I see what you mean now.
     
  5. ijmad

    ijmad Member

    Messages:
    575
    Joined:
    7 Jan 2016
    Location:
    UK
    The drab colour scheme will match nicely with the dirt-covered platforms at Moorgate.
     
  6. whoosh

    whoosh Member

    Messages:
    471
    Joined:
    3 Sep 2008
    Indeed. Especially as there appears to be a cutaway moulding in the front door of the production example (in contrast to the smoothly fronted mock up), which looks like a fantastic dirt trap!
     
  7. Bornin1980s

    Bornin1980s Member

    Messages:
    253
    Joined:
    4 Apr 2017
    Is that one reason many new trains have been ordered with black ends?

    Also, the 313s have low roofs, but these trains seem to be normal height. Will they fit in all the tunnels?
     
  8. 332 > 444

    332 > 444 Member

    Messages:
    465
    Joined:
    22 Feb 2007
    Location:
    London
    I can tell these are lower than the 700/707 trains, also seems like these have no pan wells. I await conversion to these units...
     
  9. rebmcr

    rebmcr Established Member

    Messages:
    2,480
    Joined:
    15 Nov 2011
    Location:
    London
    What do you think?
     
  10. jon0844

    jon0844 Veteran Member

    Messages:
    22,531
    Joined:
    1 Feb 2009
    Location:
    UK
    I think it has been established many times that normal trains can fit in the tunnels. Plus I'm not even sure 313s are much lower anyway.

    There are some signal sighting issues to fix but the trains will fit!
     
  11. Roast Veg

    Roast Veg Member

    Messages:
    469
    Joined:
    28 Oct 2016
    That seems to be there to accommodate the coupling when the font folds outward. Dirt trap maybe, but a better fail safe system than expecting the coupler to retract!
     
  12. ijmad

    ijmad Member

    Messages:
    575
    Joined:
    7 Jan 2016
    Location:
    UK
    So what's the latest on when we might see the first in passenger service now?
     
  13. jon0844

    jon0844 Veteran Member

    Messages:
    22,531
    Joined:
    1 Feb 2009
    Location:
    UK
    I've heard August mentioned.
     
  14. jopsuk

    jopsuk Veteran Member

    Messages:
    11,497
    Joined:
    13 May 2008
    They're literally the same height and that pantograph is clearly in a well.
     
  15. D365

    D365 Established Member

    Messages:
    6,302
    Joined:
    29 Jun 2012
    Yes, we don’t need to start that old wives’ tale again...
     
  16. traji00

    traji00 Member

    Messages:
    111
    Joined:
    17 Aug 2009
    Last edited: 15 Mar 2018
  17. jopsuk

    jopsuk Veteran Member

    Messages:
    11,497
    Joined:
    13 May 2008
    there are still people who'll claim that class 313/314/315 don't have a pantograph well.
     
  18. cj_1985

    cj_1985 Member

    Messages:
    624
    Joined:
    6 Mar 2010
    Doesn't look like there is one... or if there is, it's hell of a shallow compared to the ones on non pep BR or post privitisation stock
     
  19. Domh245

    Domh245 Established Member

    Messages:
    4,483
    Joined:
    6 Apr 2013
    Location:
    Wolverhampton
    Definitely there, although yes it's a bit more shallow compared to non-PEP stock

    [​IMG]
     
  20. hedpe

    hedpe Member

    Messages:
    80
    Joined:
    3 Nov 2010
  21. jopsuk

    jopsuk Veteran Member

    Messages:
    11,497
    Joined:
    13 May 2008
    it's a bit shallower, as the photo posted shows. Not much though. The drain points are where classically the 315s, when neglected, grew mold/algae down the outside of the carriage.
     
  22. Chris172

    Chris172 Member

    Messages:
    57
    Joined:
    3 Feb 2018
    From the picture of 717001 it’s already caked in dirty by the wheels, white is not a colour for a Trains!!
     
  23. transmanche

    transmanche Established Member

    Messages:
    5,191
    Joined:
    27 Feb 2011
    When I used to commute on 313s back in the late 1980s, the middle cabs were always made available for passenger use on six-car trains - the doors even opened just like the rest. (Obviously, the small driving compartments were locked out of use.) I learned all about how to deal with an electrocuted person from reading the posters in the guard's cab!

    I never really understood why this practice was discontinued.
     
  24. adamedwards

    adamedwards Member

    Messages:
    131
    Joined:
    4 Apr 2016
    Anti social behaviour Inc use as a toilet is what closed the cabs.
     
  25. jon0844

    jon0844 Veteran Member

    Messages:
    22,531
    Joined:
    1 Feb 2009
    Location:
    UK
    There are still occasional delays where drivers have to remove people from the private sections. The problem isn't as bad as it was a few years back, when it was widespread.

    I wasn't aware of toilet issues (although that's a problem within the passenger areas) and would have assumed they kept things locked because for some time there were lots of splits and joins.

    Today there are barely any splits and joins.
     
  26. choochoochoo

    choochoochoo Member

    Messages:
    419
    Joined:
    6 Aug 2013
    You would've thought this behaviour wouldve encouraged Dft/GTR to put a toilet on the 717.

    Outrageous that in this day and age there will be a brand new train entering service without a WC on board. Especially seeing as platform toilets on the intended routes is pretty much minimal to non-existent.
     
  27. choochoochoo

    choochoochoo Member

    Messages:
    419
    Joined:
    6 Aug 2013
    Nose door opening demo video :

     
  28. 332 > 444

    332 > 444 Member

    Messages:
    465
    Joined:
    22 Feb 2007
    Location:
    London
    Oh goody, no long step from the last rung to the ground like the separate front end ladder!
     
  29. Ianno87

    Ianno87 Established Member

    Messages:
    2,715
    Joined:
    3 May 2015
    "Outrageous"? The routes concerned have coped (aside from the odd urination in a discrete spot in the train) without on-train toilets for over 40 years, most journeys being of a short distance in nature.

    Remember part of the point of 717s is to squeeze as much on-train capacity as possible out of the 6-car limited Moorgate branch infrastructure. Add toilets and you'll likely *reduce* capacity compared to 313s. These trains will have to cope with growth for the next 35 years or so. Most passengers on the Moorgate would prioritise simply getting on a train over having a toilet for their short journey.
     
  30. choochoochoo

    choochoochoo Member

    Messages:
    419
    Joined:
    6 Aug 2013
    The needs of the travelling public have changed in 40 years. Yes, commuters would sacrifice a toilet for a short trip, but what about the other passengers who would like to use the service at other times ? Not all passengers are blessed with massive bladders and well-behaved bowels.

    Not to mention that with walk-through carriages there's going to be less places discrete urination.
     

Share This Page