Some will be scrapped though, it's inevitable.
It's funny, people thought that when the Virgin CrossCountry HSTs were going off lease. But they didn't.
(However, I personally believe that this time, some HSTs will be scrapped).
Some will be scrapped though, it's inevitable.
What 40 years in service they are still useful and some of the best machines
I heard some info floating about on the internet that AXC may take them on; this was quite a few months ago, and the rolling stock cascade situation seems to be changing more than the country's political climate! Scrap would seem a likely alternative, but who knows?
That's two that have gone now then, as 180104 is with Hull Trains (had it recently) I note.
Aren't the Grand Central HST's going to be used on the new Euston-Blackpool service next year?
Against advice given off-forum, I've had a read of this thread. I went fast to the last page initially, which is good as I discovered 180108 has left GWR. That's two that have gone now then, as 180104 is with Hull Trains (had it recently) I note. Not many more to go before they go bye-bye. Again. Don't friggin' send them back west this time!
Then I discovered this post.
Yes they have done well. Yes they have been hugely enjoyable over the years. However, they're now overdue retirement and scrap. As much as they will be missed, it is time to move on.
I need 4 of the GC HST power cars, but I've come to the conclusion that I will probably never get them all. It's just how it goes. If I get them then happy days, technically I have anyway as I got them before re-numbering. However it is unrealistic!
Will GBRf have its eyes on the HSTs? Partly for its parcels plan, and partly for "footex" services.
Given that the GC HSTs have buffers etc., is there also the possibility of the power cars being used in back-to-back pairs as locomotives?
Aren't the Grand Central HST's going to be used on the new Euston-Blackpool service next year?
AFAIK all the GWR units have been secured by GC...
Note b (page145)
Four of the Class 180 units (20 vehicles) will be subject to a sub-lease arrangement from Grand Central after the lease expiry date shown pending withdrawal from service linked to the IEP stock delivery.
Will GBRf have its eyes on the HSTs? Partly for its parcels plan, and partly for "footex" services.
Given that the GC HSTs have buffers etc., is there also the possibility of the power cars being used in back-to-back pairs as locomotives?
No, and no.
IIRC it was mentioned as a short term fall back position in the first track access applications, but that has now timed out because GC failed to meet the deadline to organise ANY rolling stock. As someone else has said, the latest cunning plan is for Mk4/91 sets. Equally unlikely IMHO, but what do I know (see the 442 saga)...
Aren't most of GC's HST trailers formerly LHCS vehicles? Presumably the wiring will be in better shape than those built as HST trailers, as they were rewired as part of the conversion. Possibly newer overall, too?
As for age, the Mark 3a LHCS went into production before the HST stock.
Aren't most of GC's HST trailers formerly LHCS vehicles? Presumably the wiring will be in better shape than those built as HST trailers, as they were rewired as part of the conversion. Possibly newer overall, too?
They are, and ironically a number of the loco hauled Mk3s on Greater Anglia are former HST trailers..
I think it would be political poison to scrap diesel stock at this time, unless they are actively dangerous.
More likely they will be put out to pasture for spot hire.
Don't see why that would be a particular issue 40 year old trains being scrapped, even if they are a vastly superior train they are older than Railbuses which will be scrapped.
When was the last time diesel units (and that's effectively what HSTs are) were scrapped except for accident damage?
It will be a brave DfT mandarin that allows them to be scrapped on the ministers watch, especially will still prevalent overloading issues in the news
First generation DMU's in the 1980s and 1990s. The class 141s were sold off to anyone who wanted to buy them.
It will be a brave DfT mandarin that allows them to be scrapped on the ministers watch, especially will still prevalent overloading issues in the news
First find the DfT "mandarin" who'll be prepared to put his signature to a document instructing the use of rail vehicles that have a risk of failing catastrophically whilst in passenger use
It'll be salami withdrawal and scrap on the basis of structural integrity.
First find the DfT "mandarin" who'll be prepared to put his signature to a document instructing the use of rail vehicles that have a risk of failing catastrophically whilst in passenger use
It'll be salami withdrawal and scrap on the basis of structural integrity.
First find the DfT "mandarin" who'll be prepared to put his signature to a document instructing the use of rail vehicles that have a risk of failing catastrophically whilst in passenger use
It'll be salami withdrawal and scrap on the basis of structural integrity.
So are you saying that Mark 3s are not structurally safe? What evidence do you have for that?
DfT (and Transport Scotland) have put their name to continued use by signing off use of HSTs for GWR, XC and ScotRail.