EM2
Established Member
Jo Johnson in at Transport (and as Minister for London).
Replaces John Hayes on roads/maritime, and doesn't appear to have any role in rail.Jo Johnson in at Transport (and as Minister for London).
Justine Greening education secretary has just resigned after refusing work and pensions
When they say 'BBC News understands' and 'we're awaiting official confirmation' it means the BBC are admitting the source(s) that told are not from official representatives of the Conservative Party and they are awaiting something official from the Conservative Party.
Given journalists probably had the Twitter feed open and were awaiting tweets to appear that's enough time to be seen by journalists. I'm aware if you have a Twitter feed open it automatically loads any new Tweets but I'm pretty sure it doesn't automatically removes any deleted Tweets so it was probably showing in journalist's Twitter feeds for much longer than 27 seconds. I've tried to reply to Tweets before to only find once I've finished writing a response that the Tweet has been deleted.
Apparently not, hence why Johnson was at Nottingham today.Paul Maynard remains rail minister (except London).
They didn’t, it was a rumour that someone confirmed as a fact without actually knowing. The BBC ‘confirmed’ incorrectly and without any knowledge. A CCHQ staff chap assumed this was correct and tweeted it when it wasn’t. The wonks in CCHQ won’t know any detail until it’s confirmed, just like the rest of us. The detail as to how and why is on the Guido Fawkes website, but fundamentally he was never offered the Chairman’s role.
No-one (other than the PM and one or two aides) really knew who would be moving or not and all the guesses have been just that, guesses.
the Person who was to be given Jeremy Hunts job kept sitting waiting for three hours while Hunt had the two hour argument with May and then was offered the Business job Hunt was supposed to get.
Of the 4 previous Ministers, Jesse Norman remains with his previous job description including Roads, Local Transport and Devolution, Baroness Sugg remains but will get a new portfolio.Apparently not, hence why Johnson was at Nottingham today.
https://www.parliament.uk/biographies/commons/paul-maynard/3926
Of the 4 previous Ministers, Jesse Norman remains with his previous job description including Roads, Local Transport and Devolution, Baroness Sugg remains but will get a new portfolio.
The 2 new comers are Jo Johnson (Orpington) and Nus Ghani (Wealden aka "Uckfield"). As JJ lives round the corner from the Euston HS2 works which he was previously made comments on he won't be able to take on an HS2 role involving London hence there can't be a direct swap of job descriptions from an old Minister to the next and similarly Nus will have to steer clear of campaigning for Uckfield-Lewes reopening in the future...
It's overly simplistic and above all not fair to attribute those issues directly to Chris Grayling.He's already upset South Wales, South Yorkshire and East Midlands by cancelling promised electrification schemes. Everybody including commuters from Tory voting areas with this years fare increases.
Yet the leader of the opposition, shadow chancellor, shadow home sec and shadow foreign sec all have constituencies in London! The Cabinet isn't representative of the whole UK but the shadow cabinet is ridiculously London centric.Indeed, and therefore absolutely no good to a Tory government.
It's a shame about Paul Maynard as he always seemed pretty good (thus his promotion) but hopefully Jo Johnson will be decent too, he certainly seems to be going places.Apparently not, hence why Johnson was at Nottingham today.
https://www.parliament.uk/biographies/commons/paul-maynard/3926
Grayling would have had the final word on the decision and also on such details as cancelling the electrification schemes completely rather than just postponing them indefinitely. I think that is what has riled people. The reversal of policy on devolution to London also seemed to arise from a change in the holder of the SoS post rather than any fundamental change in the facts.It's overly simplistic and above all not fair to attribute those issues directly to Chris Grayling.
Does it make much difference though whether they're postponed indefinitely or not? Realistically they cannot happen in the next few parliaments and (sadly) there is nothing he can do about that.Grayling would have had the final word on the decision and also on such details as cancelling the electrification schemes completely rather than just postponing them indefinitely. I think that is what has riled people. The reversal of policy on devolution to London also seemed to arise from a change in the holder of the SoS post rather than any fundamental change in the facts.
See my post #99, 5 above yours for the reasons. Nusrat normally uses Nus rather than her full first name.Nusrat Ghani has also appeared on the list of junior ministers for the Department of Transport. No-one currently has rail listed under their responsibilities.
He was for rail devolution ...
https://www.jo-johnson.com/news/jo-welcomes-new-rail-proposals-south-east
Thursday, 21 January, 2016
Jo has welcomed proposals for a new era of rail travel for London and the South East, launched today by the Secretary of State for Transport and the Mayor of London, which offer a future with better, more regular and more reliable train services.
The proposals would see the transfer of rail services that operate mostly or wholly within the Greater London boundary to TfL when the current franchises are due for renewal. Southeastern’s franchise is due for renewal in mid-2018.
In practice very little difference, but in terms of the politics quite a bit (which is why I think that part was a political decision, and a bad one at that). A postponement keeps open the intention to do this work eventually while acknowledging that costs are too high to do it currently. The regions concerned can't really disagree that the costs are too high but it comes over as a kick in the teeth to say effectively that this work will never be done. It also means the industry has no incentive to maintain an electrification capability beyond what is already committed, unless the government announces more electrifications before these are finished (which seems most unlikely).Does it make much difference though whether they're postponed indefinitely or not? Realistically they cannot happen in the next few parliaments and (sadly) there is nothing he can do about that.
1. Many MPs really, really do not understand how railways work. Hardly a revelation I know but it does mean their questions are very poor and lack focus (even allowing for time constraints in the session).
.
Wait, Trenitalia are getting involved?East Midlands franchise award is moving towards it's next step, and there are 4 bidders shortlisted: Arriva, First/Trenitalia, Stagecoach, and (newly) Abellio
Wait, Trenitalia are getting involved?