YesAre 720s cleared for the Seven Sisters route out of Liverpool Street?
This has been used by Greater Anglia in the past for engineering work diversions with 317s and 379s.
YesAre 720s cleared for the Seven Sisters route out of Liverpool Street?
This has been used by Greater Anglia in the past for engineering work diversions with 317s and 379s.
Has Anyone got a idea when the 720s can do split/couple services?
I notice the stopping mark (was 4 car I think) which was quite a few yards from the buffer has gone from Manningtree bay platform, trains are going up to buffer nearly, my estimation that a 720 wouldn’t fit was probably based on the stop mark, but as said they fit nicely with SDOIt has surprised everyone that a 720 (just) fits in platform 1 at Manningtree. A lot of people would have lost money betting it wouldn’t.
I notice the stopping mark (was 4 car I think) which was quite a few yards from the buffer has gone from Manningtree bay platform, trains are going up to buffer nearly, my estimation that a 720 wouldn’t fit was probably based on the stop mark, but as said they fit nicely with SDO
Totally agree - a massive step down compared to the 379s which are great. Once again the West Anglia Mainline is relegated to a secondary route compared to Great Eastern Mainline. Shame the 745s aren’t used for King’s Lynn and Cambridge.Got the 0728 from Whittlesford to Cambridge today.
First impressions: Wow, the aisle is narrow. Large people or people with luggage are going to really struggle to move through the train. I had a small shoulder bag and it was difficult. It's definitely been designed with commuters in mind.
The bike spaces are decidedly average. A poor showing compared to the 745s. They're shared with tip up seats means that inevitably cyclists will have to annoy people by moving them.
Also they have pedal holder things which are, in my opinion, unhelpful. They just get in the way.
Once again the West Anglia Mainline is relegated to a secondary route compared to Great Eastern Mainline
So what do you think is running on the Southend and Clacton/Ipswich lines then...??Totally agree - a massive step down compared to the 379s which are great. Once again the West Anglia Mainline is relegated to a secondary route compared to Great Eastern Mainline. Shame the 745s aren’t used for King’s Lynn and Cambridge.
Does anyone have the number for a good solicitor please? I'm currently on the 1829 from Stratford to a Southend line stop. I made the mistake of sitting on the aisle as it's busy as they don't have enought trains. My arm has fallen off from everyone walking past. I need compo.
I forgot and have out in a request to lost property. XxRemember to pick your arm up before you get off. Bruised hips is another problem, not helped by those plastic grab handles. Shame a nice train has been spoiled by maximising seats which is not now the priority, although 2+3 seating would still be needed unless you accept an overall decrease in seating capacity, which the DfT wouldn’t.
Without checking every dimension, are 24m coaches slightly narrower to keep in guage?, hence what seems to be a narrower aisle compared to a 20m class 321 or 360.
There are enough trains on a Sunday to run longer formations, but passengers losing arms is probably cheaper.
Yes, 24m vehicles are narrower and so arguably not suitable for 3+2.
I can't believe I'm typing this in this context, but that 5cm really does appear to make a difference between the 321 and 720. Yesterday was the first time I'd been on such a busy one, and it was noticeable how closed in everything felt.Depends - from when I snapped a picture of the endplate of a 720, they claim a width of 2.77m - Railwaycentre claims a width of 2.79m on the 360s and 2.82m on 321s so not exactly hugely different (at least when compared to the 360s). Not sure if it's a more tapered body profile or the seats being wider which narrows the gangway so significantly
I've yet to travel on one but from photos the gangways look no narrower than on Electrostars with 2+3 seating or the 458s in original format. In the former case it's due to the thick sidewalls and in the latter case it was due to ducting running along the sidewalls. The 450s have noticeably wider gangways because the sidewalls are thinner.Depends - from when I snapped a picture of the endplate of a 720, they claim a width of 2.77m - Railwaycentre claims a width of 2.79m on the 360s and 2.82m on 321s so not exactly hugely different (at least when compared to the 360s). Not sure if it's a more tapered body profile or the seats being wider which narrows the gangway so significantly
Carpet has considerable sound-deadening properties. It's the main reason the 720s sound so much quieter inside than 345s. It does need a lot of cleaning but ultimately makes for a more pleasant travelling environment if looked after.
I realise this post was deleted but despite living there I generally agree with youDeleted
I'd rather have a bit of rail noise as it mitigates unnecessary noises made by certain selfish passengers.
720559 in use yesterday on 0716 Witham to Liverpool street (1st time seen this one)Yeah I do agree. Quiet buses and trains really aren't something positive to me, in this day and age of noisy passengers and cell phones.
Look like, according to RTT, 5Q15 terminated in Melton Mowbray up loop and formed 5Q16 (13:16) to Wembley720580 on-route to Old Dalby. About to reverse at Melton Mowbray at the time of writing for the final stretch down to the test track.
Realtime Trains - 5Q15 0905 Derby Litchurch Lane to Melton Mowbray Up Loop
Realtime Trains is an independent source of live realtime running information for the Great British railway network.www.realtimetrains.co.uk
The unit at Ely was presumably the 17:39 2H42 arrival from Liverpool Street which goes ECS back to Cambridge CS. Although yesterday it only ran from Bishop's Stortford due to disruption.