Deepgreen
Established Member
I have read in 'Live Rail' (the magazine of the Southern Electric Group) that a passenger has won a legal case against GTR for 'mis-selling of a first class ticket'. His premise was that first class in GTR trains is not to a standard that warrants the description and fare of first class, being identical to standard class except for an antimacassar.
I wonder if this victory will see any improvement in GTR's long-standing attitude to first class and the quality thereof, or will they simply pay out to individuals who bring legal cases? My initial thought is that this ruling opens the door to a potentially massive series of similar claims from disgruntled first class fare-paying passengers.
I wonder if this victory will see any improvement in GTR's long-standing attitude to first class and the quality thereof, or will they simply pay out to individuals who bring legal cases? My initial thought is that this ruling opens the door to a potentially massive series of similar claims from disgruntled first class fare-paying passengers.