Guess the Train...

[_toommm_]

Network Rail stoneblower?

I’ll give it to you because I can’t distinguish between all the various OTMs to be honest:

 

[Efini92]

Tamper train?

 

[Islineclear3_1]

I’ll give it to you because I can’t distinguish between all the various OTMs to be honest:

View attachment 79936

Ha ha, thanks - nor can I

Open floor..

 

[FrodshamJnct]

Try this:

 

[_toommm_]

Class 09?

 

[FrodshamJnct]

Class 09?

Not an 09.

 

[Strat-tastic]

Class 68

 

[FrodshamJnct]

Class 68

Not a 68 but closer than an 09.

 

[Speed43125]

Class 70?

 

[FrodshamJnct]

Class 70?

Not a 70. It is a loco though.

 

[xotGD]

Class 57?

 

[FrodshamJnct]

Class 57?

Not a 57. 68 was the closest numbers wise.

 

[xotGD]

Close to a 68? Let's try Class 67?

 

[FrodshamJnct]

Close to a 68? Let's try Class 67?

That’s it!

 

[xotGD]

More by luck than judgement!

I'll post the next later today...

 

[xotGD]

Here we go...

 

[py_megapixel]

Hmm.. looks vaguely familiar.

Class 220/221?

 

[Esker-pades]

Class 390?

 

[xotGD]

Hmm.. looks vaguely familiar.

Class 220/221?

Class 390?

Sorry, neither of those.

 

[FrodshamJnct]

Class 68?

 

[xotGD]

Class 68?

It certainly is...



Your turn...

 

[FrodshamJnct]

Next:

 

[py_megapixel]

class 323?

 

[FrodshamJnct]

class 323?

Not a 323. This isn’t an EMU.

 

[Speed43125]

Turbostar of some sort? 172?

 

[FrodshamJnct]

Turbostar of some sort? 172?

Yes (Turbostar) and no (172).

 

[py_megapixel]

170?

 

[Islineclear3_1]

Southern Class 171?

 

[py_megapixel]

This is quite tricky, given that all Turbostars except 172s have nearly indistinguishable exteriors!

 

[FrodshamJnct]

170?

Yep!