• Our booking engine at tickets.railforums.co.uk (powered by TrainSplit) helps support the running of the forum with every ticket purchase! Find out more and ask any questions/give us feedback in this thread!

GWR Turbo cascade progress to Bristol region services

Status
Not open for further replies.

uxm

Member
Joined
1 Sep 2018
Messages
197
To replace the 150/1s and 143s those routes have lost. Why do they need to be on the current routes?

Ultimately the only HSTs at Cardiff will be going to Taunton/Exeter/Plymouth/Penzance - the London services will be entirely IET worked within the next 6 months.
So the 158s are replacing pacers and 150s? why can't the turbos do that and keep the 158s on the current routes?
 
Sponsor Post - registered members do not see these adverts; click here to register, or click here to log in
R

RailUK Forums

JN114

Established Member
Joined
28 Jun 2005
Messages
3,354
So the 158s are replacing pacers and 150s? why can't the turbos do that and keep the 158s on the current routes?

Because the Portsmouth route is incredibly overcrowded and needs the additional capacity Turbos offer.
 

ATW158Xpress

Member
Joined
6 Dec 2016
Messages
287
Turbos will reduce dwall time at stations with the door being 1/3 and 2/3 in the saloons instead of the ends.
 

jimm

Established Member
Joined
6 Apr 2012
Messages
5,231
But that's not really the key issue on the route - passenger capacity is the number one and has been for a long time now.
 

Parallel

Established Member
Joined
9 Dec 2013
Messages
3,937
Just saw 165129 on the 09:31 departure from Bath to Portsmouth today. Are Turbos now able to work down to the harbour?
 

pompeyfan

Established Member
Joined
24 Jan 2012
Messages
4,190
Just saw 165129 on the 09:31 departure from Bath to Portsmouth today. Are Turbos now able to work down to the harbour?

Last I remember reading was that a ground position signal at the Harbour wasn’t due to be moved until mid December, possible that they’ll either throw it into Fareham Bay, Fratton platform 2 or maybe even the low level.
 

TJDevon

Member
Joined
29 Jan 2018
Messages
142
Location
Exmouth
I would appreciate an update from anyone 'in the know' as regards which Turbo units have been transferred to Bristol. Put simply, which 166 haven't and which 165s have moved. Possibly some that have been transferred are still not in use awaiting modifications?

Are the Turbos proving reliable?

Thanks in advance.
 
Joined
30 Jul 2015
Messages
779
I think "moved" over simplifies the current situation. A lot of turbos have been to Bristol, worked in passenger service and then returned to Reading where they work for a bit and in some cases (e.g 165134) then go back to Bristol again. The situation is very fluid. I am not claiming this as a definitive list but I think currently;

166 (all RHM)
RDG 166201,203,215,217,221
SPM 166202,204-214,216,218-220

165 2-car
RHM
SPM 165119,122,127,129,131,132,134

Non RHM
RDG 165118,121,123-126,128,130,133,135-137
Wolverton 165120

With air-cooling 165118,119,123-125,128,130,131,134-137
Without air-cooling 165121,122,126,127,129,132,133

165 3-car (all non RHM)
RDG 165101,102,104-114,116,117
Wolverton 165103

With air-cooling 165110,116,117
Without air-cooling 165101,102,104-109,111-114

I welcome any corrections to mistakes I may have made.
 

JN114

Established Member
Joined
28 Jun 2005
Messages
3,354
I think "moved" over simplifies the current situation. A lot of turbos have been to Bristol, worked in passenger service and then returned to Reading where they work for a bit and in some cases (e.g 165134) then go back to Bristol again. The situation is very fluid. I am not claiming this as a definitive list but I think currently;

166 (all RHM)
RDG 166201,203,215,217,221
SPM 166202,204-214,216,218-220

165 2-car
RHM
SPM 165119,122,127,129,131,132,134

Non RHM
RDG 165118,121,123-126,128,130,133,135-137
Wolverton 165120

With air-cooling 165118,119,123-125,128,130,131,134-137
Without air-cooling 165121,122,126,127,129,132,133

165 3-car (all non RHM)
RDG 165101,102,104-114,116,117
Wolverton 165103

With air-cooling 165110,116,117
Without air-cooling 165101,102,104-109,111-114

I welcome any corrections to mistakes I may have made.

RHM 122 is currently Reading-based.

The works units are as follows:
165101 Wolverton
165103 Long Marston
165116 Long Marston
165120 Wolverton
165127 Overhaul on SPM

As far as I’m aware all are to return to Reading when done.
 

PHILIPE

Veteran Member
Joined
14 Nov 2011
Messages
13,472
Location
Caerphilly
I think "moved" over simplifies the current situation. A lot of turbos have been to Bristol, worked in passenger service and then returned to Reading where they work for a bit and in some cases (e.g 165134) then go back to Bristol again. The situation is very fluid. I am not claiming this as a definitive list but I think currently;

166 (all RHM)
RDG 166201,203,215,217,221
SPM 166202,204-214,216,218-220

165 2-car
RHM
SPM 165119,122,127,129,131,132,134

Non RHM
RDG 165118,121,123-126,128,130,133,135-137
Wolverton 165120

With air-cooling 165118,119,123-125,128,130,131,134-137
Without air-cooling 165121,122,126,127,129,132,133

165 3-car (all non RHM)
RDG 165101,102,104-114,116,117
Wolverton 165103

With air-cooling 165110,116,117
Without air-cooling 165101,102,104-109,111-114

I welcome any corrections to mistakes I may have made.

As said, the movements can be fluid but without knowing the actual numbers, there are only 5 x 165s at SPM with a further 5 expected to move in January
 
Joined
30 Jul 2015
Messages
779
RHM 122 is currently Reading-based.

The works units are as follows:
165101 Wolverton
165103 Long Marston
165116 Long Marston
165120 Wolverton
165127 Overhaul on SPM

As far as I’m aware all are to return to Reading when done.

Thank you for that update. I thought that I would have missed a few changes but there were more than I had realised!
 

TJDevon

Member
Joined
29 Jan 2018
Messages
142
Location
Exmouth
Many thanks to everyone for the information. Much appreciated.

As there have been no comments on reliability may I assume that they are at least as reliable as the 158s? Or better?
 

Sean Emmett

Member
Joined
9 Mar 2015
Messages
496
As there have been no comments on reliability may I assume that they are at least as reliable as the 158s? Or better?
They were very unreliable when first introduced on the Severn Beach line, but it has got better and the extra capacity is much needed here too.
 

DaveHarries

Established Member
Joined
12 Dec 2011
Messages
2,298
Location
England
They were very unreliable when first introduced on the Severn Beach line, but it has got better and the extra capacity is much needed here too.
Agreed. I am glad that the 150s have gone from my morning commute between Sea Mills and Bristol Temple Meads. When we did have 158s they did a good job though and seemed to run well on the SBL.

As for the future of the 158s I believe that some are planned to be used between Exeter Central and Barnstaple once alterations come in during May 2019 which will see Paignton to Exmouth go half-hourly end-to-end, hence no through services between Exmouth and Barnstaple. I guess the times for the Barnstaple services may get revised once this comes in.

Dave
 

adrock1976

Established Member
Joined
10 Dec 2013
Messages
4,450
Location
What's it called? It's called Cumbernauld
Agreed. I am glad that the 150s have gone from my morning commute between Sea Mills and Bristol Temple Meads. When we did have 158s they did a good job though and seemed to run well on the SBL.

As for the future of the 158s I believe that some are planned to be used between Exeter Central and Barnstaple once alterations come in during May 2019 which will see Paignton to Exmouth go half-hourly end-to-end, hence no through services between Exmouth and Barnstaple. I guess the times for the Barnstaple services may get revised once this comes in.

Dave

Although more of a timetabling/infrastructure question, would this make the Barnstaple line timetable more robust, as I remember trains are timetabled to pass each other at Crediton and Eggesford?
 

TJDevon

Member
Joined
29 Jan 2018
Messages
142
Location
Exmouth
Does anyone know how many Turbos will be needed to work the Portsmouth services? As I recall at least some diagrams will need two units?
 

ATW158Xpress

Member
Joined
6 Dec 2016
Messages
287
Does anyone know how many Turbos will be needed to work the Portsmouth services? As I recall at least some diagrams will need two units?
There will be about eight 3 car 166 diagrams. With around 5 or 6 of them will have a 2 car 165 throughout or part of the day joining and spitting either at Bristol TM or Westbury.
 

S-Bahn

Member
Joined
2 Nov 2018
Messages
263
There will be about eight 3 car 166 diagrams. With around 5 or 6 of them will have a 2 car 165 throughout or part of the day joining and spitting either at Bristol TM or Westbury.

I'm assuming the reason for splitting would be to use the 2 car 165's for a local route at certain times?
 

Parallel

Established Member
Joined
9 Dec 2013
Messages
3,937
I’m still hoping they can rip out the current seating arrangement and fit 2+2 seating with arm rests and some tables throughout, in the future. The current seating isn’t really adequate and on such a busy route, you’re going to get lots of people who can’t or won’t sit in the middle seats and will instead block the doors or aisles. Hopefully GWR’s proposal will finally get approved by the DfT.
 
Joined
30 Jul 2015
Messages
779
RHM 122 is currently Reading-based.

The works units are as follows:
165101 Wolverton
165103 Long Marston
165116 Long Marston
165120 Wolverton
165127 Overhaul on SPM

As far as I’m aware all are to return to Reading when done.
165116 noted on 1135 Long Marston - Reading today
 

ATW158Xpress

Member
Joined
6 Dec 2016
Messages
287
Rail mag has posted that GWR is delaying its’ introduction of new Hitachi trains on stopping services to Newbury and Berwyn until further notice. New CCTV cameras will have to be fitted so that the drivers can see when doors can safely be closed. Longer 9 car Hitachi trains on the route to the South West would be unaffected as they carry guards and do not stop at small unstaffed stations in Berkshire and Wiltshire.

Wonder how many Turbos will now be cascaded to Bristol in January with IET services to Bedwyn being put on hold?
 
Joined
29 Sep 2018
Messages
435
So how many Turbos will still move to Bristol? Surely the extra 4 165s to make 10 of those there will now be affected.
 
Last edited:

Clarence Yard

Established Member
Joined
18 Dec 2014
Messages
2,487
The Bedwyns are staying Turbo, for now. Use of guards on 800 units doing the Bedwyns is wibble.

3 Turbos are staying at Reading to cover the diagrams until Hitachi do a mod on the IET sets. The trial mod is likely to begin tests in mid to late January.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Top