• Our booking engine at tickets.railforums.co.uk (powered by TrainSplit) helps support the running of the forum with every ticket purchase! Find out more and ask any questions/give us feedback in this thread!

Hanson lost a cement wagon at Clitheroe !

Status
Not open for further replies.

PG

Established Member
Joined
12 Oct 2010
Messages
2,842
Location
at the end of the high and low roads
Reported by RSSB as: "Wagon detached for handbrake maintenance." Clearly the handbrake wasn't working.
I don't know the protocol for maintenance which involves the handbrake but it would seem reasonable to assume it would either include scotching the wheels to prevent a runaway or being coupled to another vehicle with a working handbrake?
 
Sponsor Post - registered members do not see these adverts; click here to register, or click here to log in
R

RailUK Forums

Trackman

Established Member
Joined
28 Feb 2013
Messages
2,949
Location
Lewisham
RAIB now involved
https://www.gov.uk/government/news/runaway-and-derailment-of-a-wagon-at-clitheroe
At about 08:20 hrs on 9 March 2020, a tank wagon loaded with cement powder ran away from a siding located within the Hanson cement works in Clitheroe.


The wagon left the works and continued to run away on the descent towards Horrocksford Junction, where the line to the cement works connects to the main railway line from Blackburn to Hellifield.


As it ran away, the wagon broke through the gates at the exit from the cement works and ran over an open level crossing located on a public road, causing two cars to stop. A short distance later, the wagon passed over an open crossing on a private road. Neither level crossing had its manually activated warning equipment switched on before the wagon passed over.


On reaching Horrocksford Junction, the wagon derailed at the end of the run-out rails for a set of trap points. The trap points worked as intended to prevent such unauthorised movements from reaching the main line. The derailed wagon stopped clear of the main line and no trains were nearby when the derailment occurred. The wagon ran away for a total distance of about 0.75 miles (1.2 km).


Our investigation will seek to identify the sequence of events which led to the accident. It will also consider any factors relevant to the performance and design of the wagon’s braking system, how the risk of runaway wagons from within the cement works was controlled and any relevant underlying factors.
 
Last edited by a moderator:

DB

Guest
Joined
18 Nov 2009
Messages
5,036
Is the low loader wagon still rotting away by the up line near Bellingham (I think)? There may even have been more than one involved and the last time I passed the site they were being absorbed into the planet again!

Isn't there a freight branch somewhere with a fairly modern coal wagon in the undergrowth beside the line as it was too difficult to recover it?
 

Elecman

Established Member
Joined
31 Dec 2013
Messages
2,893
Location
Lancashire
There used to be wagons at Ince Moss Tip and Burnden sidings in the undergrowth for years
 

2HAP

Member
Joined
12 Apr 2016
Messages
467
Location
Hadlow
I asked for this thread to be reopened because the RAIB have published their report.


Summary
At about 08:16 hrs on 9 March 2020, a loaded wagon ran away from a siding located within the Hanson UK cement works in Clitheroe. It travelled a distance of about 0.75 miles (1.2 km) on a falling gradient, before it derailed at Horrocksford Junction, where the freight only branch line from the cement works connects to the main railway lines.

As it ran away, the wagon broke through the gates at the exit from the works and then ran over a level crossing on a public road, causing two cars to stop. Soon afterwards, the wagon passed over a second level crossing on a private road, which leads to a chemical works. Neither level crossing had its manually activated warning equipment switched on before the wagon passed over it.

On arriving at Horrocksford Junction, the wagon derailed at a set of trap points. As intended, this arrangement prevented the wagon from reaching the main lines. The derailed wagon stopped clear of the nearest main line and no trains were nearby at the time of the derailment. No one was injured in the accident, although there was minor damage to the wagon and severe damage to the track where the wagon had run derailed.

The investigation found that the wagon ran away because its handbrake was not effective at holding it in place on the gradient where it had been stabled. This was due to a combination of insufficient brake force being provided by the applied handbrake and the fully laden wagon being stabled on its own and on a gradient falling towards the exit from the cement works. The staff who stabled the wagon did not know the handbrake would not hold the wagon in place after they applied it, as the wagon’s brakes were already pneumatically applied when they did this, and over time, the air in the brake system leaked away until the air brake was released. It is possible that a maintenance examination that was due before the accident, but which was not carried out, would have found the problem with the handbrake’s effectiveness.

An underlying factor was that the parties responsible for the operation of trains at the cement works had not adequately assessed or controlled the risk of a rail vehicle running away from the cement works. RAIB also observed that the risks to users at one of the level crossings concerned were not being managed by Network Rail, and that potential evidence, which might have explained why the handbrake provided insufficient force to hold the wagon in place, was lost to the investigation.

Recommendations

RAIB has made three recommendations. The first is that GB Railfreight should work with the owners of industrial premises to improve its assessment of the risks of runaway vehicles. The second recommends that Hanson UK should assure itself that a suitable and sufficient risk assessment has been undertaken for all rail operations taking place on its site. The third recommendation is that freight operating companies review the adequacy of the processes followed for stabling vehicles on a gradient using handbrakes, particularly if a laden vehicle is to be left on its own. RAIB also identified two learning points. The first is a reminder of the importance of scheduled examinations of wagons taking place on or before their due dates. The second is a reminder about the importance of preserving items of evidence required for safety investigations.
 

trebor79

Established Member
Joined
8 Mar 2018
Messages
4,442
Isn't there a freight branch somewhere with a fairly modern coal wagon in the undergrowth beside the line as it was too difficult to recover it?
I remember when I used to make a regular Durham to Bristol journey in the late 90's early 2000's there were several tank waggons on their side in the undergrowth at the bottom of an embankment somewhere in the Derby/Burton area. Looked like they'd derailed, gone down the embankment and just been left in situ years before.
 

Gloster

Established Member
Joined
4 Sep 2020
Messages
8,381
Location
Up the creek
Isn't there a freight branch somewhere with a fairly modern coal wagon in the undergrowth beside the line as it was too difficult to recover it?
I have seen this somewhere and think it is one of the longer branches, possibly the Onllwyn branch.
 

Tracked

Established Member
Joined
30 May 2011
Messages
1,245
Location
53.5440°N 1.1510°W
There's a thread on abandoned railway vehicles;
 

Tallguy

Member
Joined
3 Mar 2011
Messages
361
Can someone please explain what a ‘trap point’ is as described in this incident? Thanks.
 

Tom Quinne

On Moderation
Joined
8 Jul 2017
Messages
2,225
Basically a point which leads to nowhere, either a very short spur to a stop block, sand drag or literally nothing aside dirt.
 

1955LR

Member
Joined
11 Dec 2019
Messages
242
Location
Hereford
Reading the report it would appear to me that the wagon park brake has to be wound on to hold when all air has leaked away. I am surprised that a method could not be devised that park brakes would automatically apply, such as a spring, if disconnected and then would need to be wound off to move individually , not wound on to hold. Am I reading this correctly?
 

66701GBRF

Member
Joined
3 Jun 2017
Messages
557
You are reading it correctly, however that is a standard handbrake that has existed on many types of wagons for decades and in itself is not a problem.
 

edwin_m

Veteran Member
Joined
21 Apr 2013
Messages
24,871
Location
Nottingham
Reading the report it would appear to me that the wagon park brake has to be wound on to hold when all air has leaked away. I am surprised that a method could not be devised that park brakes would automatically apply, such as a spring, if disconnected and then would need to be wound off to move individually , not wound on to hold. Am I reading this correctly?
Most modern multiple units have this sort of arrangement. Wagons don't, as far as I'm aware. This may be because sometimes they are shunted without connecting the air pipes so they need to be unbraked when that happens, and as well as the extra work of winding the brake off there would be the risk of forgetting to put it back on again afterwards. Also most problems with the hand brake (but not this particular one) are probably obvious when trying to apply it, but if someone relied on the spring brake applying when the air leaked off, then there are various failures such as a broken spring that might not be noticed.
 

1955LR

Member
Joined
11 Dec 2019
Messages
242
Location
Hereford
I guess safety comes back to having preventative maintenance and following the correct procedure at all times , but we are all human!
 

horsewalrus

New Member
Joined
24 Dec 2019
Messages
2
Location
York
Basically a point which leads to nowhere, either a very short spur to a stop block, sand drag or literally nothing aside dirt.
To add to this - trap points are usually placed on branches leading up to main lines, so in the event of a runaway (exactly like in this case), or e.g. the route not being set correctly or drivers misreading signals leading to a potential collision (like in that case at Paddington) the vehicle can be derailed - not ideal, but certainly more desirable than a runaway on the main line!
 

edwin_m

Veteran Member
Joined
21 Apr 2013
Messages
24,871
Location
Nottingham
To add to this - trap points are usually placed on branches leading up to main lines, so in the event of a runaway (exactly like in this case), or e.g. the route not being set correctly or drivers misreading signals leading to a potential collision (like in that case at Paddington) the vehicle can be derailed - not ideal, but certainly more desirable than a runaway on the main line!
Trapping is mandatory for exits from sidings, yards etc where trains may be parked with brakes accidentally not applied, or shunted unbraked where a coupling failure could send wagons rolling towards the main line. There may be a few places where they are not needed if the connection is on a steep rising gradient (towards the main line), but this would be unusual as such yards etc are normally fairly level. They are also unnecessary if the layout of the yard etc allows another set of points to provide the trapping function - where the exit to the main line is effectively a crossover. The trap point or the point providing the trapping is always worked by the controlling signal box simultaneously with the junction point to the main line, and will be restored to the normal (trapping) position any time no train is signalled in or out.

They are sometimes also seen where a Goods line, not signalled to full passenger standards, converges with a passenger line. This is becoming less common as re-signalling will usually upgrade the line to passenger status and provide an overlap from the protecting signal if possible. Finally there are a few trap points on passenger lines, but this is discouraged because the derailment on the traps is itself a hazard to passengers, and unless speeds are very low there will probably be a sand drag as discussed in another thread.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Top