• Our booking engine at tickets.railforums.co.uk (powered by TrainSplit) helps support the running of the forum with every ticket purchase! Find out more and ask any questions/give us feedback in this thread!

How many flat crossings are left?

Status
Not open for further replies.

richieb1971

Established Member
Joined
28 Jan 2013
Messages
1,979
10940520_1661577124069735_39477686433043444_n_zpsa6tgvhig.jpg


The picture above is where the Hitchin/Bedford railway (Hitchin going off in the distance) crosses the Oxford/Cambridge line circa 1964.

I have seen one north of Newark but I don't know anything about the line. Anymore? And can you get near them?
 
Sponsor Post - registered members do not see these adverts; click here to register, or click here to log in
R

RailUK Forums

MidnightFlyer

Veteran Member
Joined
16 May 2010
Messages
12,857
The (official?) term for them is flat crossing. Newark is the only one left where two standard gauge passenger lines cross. One also exists at Porthmadog, where the NR line crosses with the narrow gauge Welsh Highland Railway.
 

ComUtoR

Established Member
Joined
13 Dec 2013
Messages
9,432
Location
UK
I think Lewisham is a Switch Diamond.

The pic above just has lines going across each other so I'm not sure if there is any point work. They just cross and would be protected by signals ?

Lewisham has moving points and is protected by signals and diverging routes with the points.

I assume that with the interlocking and higher levels of protection required nowadays that the flat crossings are no longer to standards ?
 

najaB

Veteran Member
Joined
28 Aug 2011
Messages
30,784
Location
Scotland
I assume that with the interlocking and higher levels of protection required nowadays that the flat crossings are no longer to standards ?
I don't know about protection, but they are hard on the wheels. Hitting the Newark one at linespeed (110mph I think) can result in a very lively response.
 

notadriver

Established Member
Joined
1 Oct 2010
Messages
3,653
I think that one is still 100. To be honest I think they need to get rid of obstacles like these (on main lines) so trains can run at higher average speeds and to reduce maintenance costs.
 

High Dyke

Established Member
Joined
1 Jan 2013
Messages
4,281
Location
Yellabelly Country
10940520_1661577124069735_39477686433043444_n_zpsa6tgvhig.jpg


The picture above is where the Hitchin/Bedford railway (Hitchin going off in the distance) crosses the Oxford/Cambridge line circa 1964.

I have seen one north of Newark but I don't know anything about the line. Anymore? And can you get near them?
Access to the one at Newark is fairly difficult, there is no public access. One of the best views is from the A46 bypass flyover... (not my photo) http://www.geograph.org.uk/photo/2740089

I don't know about protection, but they are hard on the wheels. Hitting the Newark one at linespeed (110mph I think) can result in a very lively response.
Which is why the maximum linespeed over the ECML side of it is 100mph - however you are correct it does give a lively response.

The crossing is protected by signals and also SPAD indicators on both the Down ECML and Down Midland. The signal on the Up ECML means that approaching trains are held at the previous signal due to the overlap distance. Up Midland trains are a sufficient distance back from the crossing when stopped at a protecting signal.
 

dzug2

Member
Joined
5 Feb 2011
Messages
867
You can get near the site of the Bedford one on a Bedford Bletchley train.

Not sure where the new spur to the new St Johns and Midland stations is in relation to the old flat crossing though
 

lincolnshire

Member
Joined
12 Jun 2011
Messages
884
Also think its time it went, more important to get rid of things like this than spend money on other things. Would reduce maintenance costs and also train delay cost and be far safer knowing that regardless of safety items fitted that a train could not run into a train running across it at the same time. Is there trap points fitted to in case signals are passed to derail the train then?

In 2014 its something that should be high priority to be removed, a higher priority than maned level crossings but then these get rid of staff who man them so more cost effective for them to be removed.
 

High Dyke

Established Member
Joined
1 Jan 2013
Messages
4,281
Location
Yellabelly Country
You can get near the site of the Bedford one on a Bedford Bletchley train.

Not sure where the new spur to the new St Johns and Midland stations is in relation to the old flat crossing though
It looks like the spur now runs to the east of the Hitchin alignment and crosses over near to where the flat crossing was situated.

Old maps here: http://www.disused-stations.org.uk/b/bedford_st_johns/
 

najaB

Veteran Member
Joined
28 Aug 2011
Messages
30,784
Location
Scotland
In 2014 its something that should be high priority to be removed, a higher priority than maned level crossings but then these get rid of staff who man them so more cost effective for them to be removed.
NR have said many times that they want to be rid of it, but it is a very difficult one to manage given the geography of the area. An opportunity was missed when the A46 bridge was built, but at the time BR (RailTrack?) didn't have the money.
 

snowball

Established Member
Joined
4 Mar 2013
Messages
7,717
Location
Leeds
NR have said many times that they want to be rid of it, but it is a very difficult one to manage given the geography of the area. An opportunity was missed when the A46 bridge was built, but at the time BR (RailTrack?) didn't have the money.

There's now a scheme in the road programme to dual the A46 Newark relief road, which will presumably involve either widening the bridge over the ECML or building a new bridge alongside. It still has to go through all its design and approval stages so it's probably 6-10 years away from starting construction.
 

richieb1971

Established Member
Joined
28 Jan 2013
Messages
1,979
Attached is a map of the old St Johns with drawings showing the crossing location. It is not accessible without trespassing on NR land.

I am assuming the Newark crossing picture posted above has a fair amount of zoom on it? No point me going there to video if I have to zoom 30x to get a view like that.

Which station on RTT is best to represent what cross the ECML at that location? Does any freight go over it or just units?
 

Attachments

  • st johns.JPG
    st johns.JPG
    418.8 KB · Views: 143

najaB

Veteran Member
Joined
28 Aug 2011
Messages
30,784
Location
Scotland
I am assuming the Newark crossing picture posted above has a fair amount of zoom on it?
Judge the distance from Google maps, doesn't look that far to me.
Which station on RTT is best to represent what cross the ECML at that location? Does any freight go over it or just units?
If you mean at Newark, then Newark Castle is the closest station.
 
Last edited:

45rpm

Member
Joined
2 Apr 2011
Messages
98
Location
York
Not in the U.K but not too far away,there is one at Limerick Junction,just north of the station.
 

richieb1971

Established Member
Joined
28 Jan 2013
Messages
1,979
There does seem to be a path around the sewage works from the Newark Castle car park. How much of it is public access I have no idea. There is only one video showing the crossing on youtube and appears to be filmed by a network rail worker walking along the track.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IiffBGWTjjk
 

Tomnick

Established Member
Joined
10 Jun 2005
Messages
5,840
Which station on RTT is best to represent what cross the ECML at that location? Does any freight go over it or just units?
If you're after a timing location rather than specifically a passenger station, all trains on both routes (and around the 1980s - ? - curve) appear to be timed at Newark F.C.. There's a reasonable amount of freight on each line but, as others have said, the A46 flyover (whilst very close) is rather busy and noisy.
 

Trog

Established Member
Joined
30 Oct 2009
Messages
1,546
Location
In Retirement.
It looks like the spur now runs to the east of the Hitchin alignment and crosses over near to where the flat crossing was situated.

Old maps here: http://www.disused-stations.org.uk/b/bedford_st_johns/

The picture is looking towards Bedford with Hitchin behind you. The spur you refer to can be seen crossing the double track as a second flat crossing under the train. The new St Johns station is now under the bridge in the right background of the photo.
 

richieb1971

Established Member
Joined
28 Jan 2013
Messages
1,979
Your right. I thought the double arched bridge in the background looked a bit weird.
 

lincolnshire

Member
Joined
12 Jun 2011
Messages
884
This was Newark being relaid in the early 80's.
It has been redone at least once since then.

Just look what plant they are using for the replacement job then? no very large road mounted cranes to be seen. Its just the good old breakdown cranes from the nearest loco depot,s one most probably been Doncaster Carr Loco,s crane and the rest of the breakdown train just in case it had to go to a derailment.

In them days all the cost was kept in house in this case instead of hiring in large road cranes needing bases constructing beforehand .

Them was the days.
 
Last edited:

ainsworth74

Forum Staff
Staff Member
Global Moderator
Joined
16 Nov 2009
Messages
27,647
Location
Redcar
I would have thought one of Volker Rails Kirow family of rail cranes would be able to just as a good a job as those in the picture above. No road cranes required...
 

Taunton

Established Member
Joined
1 Aug 2013
Messages
10,068
Just look what plant they are using for the replacement job then? no very large road mounted cranes to be seen. Its just the good old breakdown cranes from the nearest loco depot,s one most probably been Doncaster Carr Loco,s crane and the rest of the breakdown train just in case it had to go to a derailment.

In them days all the cost was kept in house in this case instead of hiring in large road cranes needing bases constructing beforehand.
Actually the bulk of the work done with the heavy breakdown cranes was always jobs for the engineers; derailments needing the "big hook" were actually few and far between, most just needed the tool vans which contained jacks and ramps etc. Sure, they were always kept on the front road of their loco depot, mainly for ready availability of a loco to go anywhere, but most of their work was planned in advance. There were various procedures if there was an incident while they were in use, just like there were if you were unlucky enough to get two incidents together, or one which needed two cranes (as big civils jobs often did).

I've forgotten where the big hook came from for Taunton jobs, something tells me it was Swindon. A photo I recall of the crane once overturned in Swindon scrap yard attempting to pick up a boiler from a scrap loco shows there were all sorts of things to use them for (presumably the Old Oak Common one had to come and pick up it's sibling).
 

satisnek

Member
Joined
5 Sep 2014
Messages
888
Location
Kidderminster/Mercia Marina
Also think its time it went, more important to get rid of things like this than spend money on other things. Would reduce maintenance costs and also train delay cost and be far safer knowing that regardless of safety items fitted that a train could not run into a train running across it at the same time. Is there trap points fitted to in case signals are passed to derail the train then?

In 2014 its something that should be high priority to be removed, a higher priority than maned level crossings but then these get rid of staff who man them so more cost effective for them to be removed.

In terms of safety, surely a flat crossing is no different to a converging junction?
 

richieb1971

Established Member
Joined
28 Jan 2013
Messages
1,979
Except that a converging accident is usually not as spectacular as a head on one.
 

zuriblue

Member
Joined
12 Oct 2014
Messages
534
Location
Baden Switzerland
Quite a few on the Continent, there are a couple near me in Switzerland where tramways or interurbans cross the big railway.

For instance in Oberentfelden near Aarau there's a crossing at a level crossing where the local metre gauge interurban (Wynental und Suhrental bahn) crosses the Standard Gauge SBB line from Suhr to Zofingen. To make it even more interesting the WSB is electrified at 750 VDC (due to street running) and the SBB line at the standard 15 kV 16.7 Hz.

You occasionally see the rather unusual sight of a train being held at the gates of a level crossing for another train,
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Top