• Our booking engine at tickets.railforums.co.uk (powered by TrainSplit) helps support the running of the forum with every ticket purchase! Find out more and ask any questions/give us feedback in this thread!

HS2 in the press

Status
Not open for further replies.
Sponsor Post - registered members do not see these adverts; click here to register, or click here to log in
R

RailUK Forums

WatcherZero

Established Member
Joined
25 Feb 2010
Messages
10,272
Reading through the new Network Rail Freight strategy, there seems to be a hint in there that HS2 while rejoining the WCML alignment south of Wigan would be grade separated from the other WCML lines until leaving Wigan North Western station northwards. It also talks about adding more terminal platforms to Wigan in the long term, grade separating Euxton junction, four tracking Wigan-Preston also seperately in the medium term line speed improvements through Wigan (I think that's referring to most freight traffic today using the fast line through North Western rather than the slow line).
 
Last edited:

HSTEd

Veteran Member
Joined
14 Jul 2011
Messages
16,722
Four tracking North of Wigan or constructing a new two track railway on a different alignment, according to the copy of RAIL I glanced at a few days ago.

Which means one of three things - you could build a dedicated HSL and leave all local traffic on the existing alignment, you could build a dedicated freight line and leave all passenger trains on the local alignment, or you could build some sort of passenger dedicated line for all passenger traffic and leave only the freight on the existing route.

I actually lean towards the latter two options, with a preference for the latter since it effectively becomes a Shinkansen.
 
Last edited:

snowball

Established Member
Joined
4 Mar 2013
Messages
7,734
Location
Leeds
https://www.theguardian.com/uk-news...efore-key-decision-on-high-speed-rail-project

The boss of HS2, the company behind the UK’s planned £55bn high-speed rail network, has announced he is leaving just weeks before the transport secretary is expected to make a key decision on the controversial project’s future.

Simon Kirby, who reportedly earns £750,000 a year as chief executive at Europe’s largest infrastructure project, is to become chief operating officer at the engineering firm Rolls-Royce.
 

WatcherZero

Established Member
Joined
25 Feb 2010
Messages
10,272
Yes, that he can get 6 times his £750k HS2 salary as COO of Rolls Royce. The previous COO received a salary of £6.22m including bonuses in 2014.
 

midlandred

Member
Joined
20 Feb 2007
Messages
244
Location
Oxfordshire
BBC News says:

The boss of the controversial HS2 rail link is leaving to take up a senior post at Rolls-Royce, the aerospace and engineering group has said.
Simon Kirby will take up the role of chief operating officer, reporting to chief executive Warren East.
Mr Kirby has earned a reported £750,000 salary at HS2, which will link London with the Midlands and northern England.
He said it had been a "huge honour" to work on the project, which critics say threatens swathes of countryside.
HS2 Ltd said it would miss Mr Kirby's "experience and leadership", while Rolls-Royce boss Mr East said the appointment would "strengthen management capability ahead of a period of significant expansion".
But Stop HS2 campaign manager Joe Rukin accused Mr Kirby of "getting out before the true scale of the mess he has presided over is realised".
"The departure of Simon Kirby will be a serious blow to those who champion HS2, though many of us are at a complete loss to see just exactly what it is he has done to justify his three-quarter of a million pay packet."
 

NotATrainspott

Established Member
Joined
2 Feb 2013
Messages
3,224
Four tracking North of Wigan or constructing a new two track railway on a different alignment, according to the copy of RAIL I glanced at a few days ago.

Which means one of three things - you could build a dedicated HSL and leave all local traffic on the existing alignment, you could build a dedicated freight line and leave all passenger trains on the local alignment, or you could build some sort of passenger dedicated line for all passenger traffic and leave only the freight on the existing route.

I actually lean towards the latter two options, with a preference for the latter since it effectively becomes a Shinkansen.

Would be a brand new passenger line, a new freight line would never wash its face.

The HS2 Scotland report suggested that HS2 West would link into the WCML at Coppull, not Bamfurlong, and then the WCML would be four-tracked to a grade-separated Euxton Junction. This sounds easier to deliver and with bigger benefits than adding another slow pair of tracks through the middle of Wigan.
 

deltic

Established Member
Joined
8 Feb 2010
Messages
3,219
BBC News says:

The boss of the controversial HS2 rail link is leaving to take up a senior post at Rolls-Royce, the aerospace and engineering group has said.
Simon Kirby will take up the role of chief operating officer, reporting to chief executive Warren East.
Mr Kirby has earned a reported £750,000 salary at HS2, which will link London with the Midlands and northern England.
He said it had been a "huge honour" to work on the project, which critics say threatens swathes of countryside.
HS2 Ltd said it would miss Mr Kirby's "experience and leadership", while Rolls-Royce boss Mr East said the appointment would "strengthen management capability ahead of a period of significant expansion".
But Stop HS2 campaign manager Joe Rukin accused Mr Kirby of "getting out before the true scale of the mess he has presided over is realised".
"The departure of Simon Kirby will be a serious blow to those who champion HS2, though many of us are at a complete loss to see just exactly what it is he has done to justify his three-quarter of a million pay packet."

The BBC is becoming more absurd in its position of trying to be seen as impartial. Why does it feel it has to quote Joe Ruskin who has a following of virtually no one on anything to do with HS2. Ruskin peddles the usual contradictory line that this is a disaster for HS2 while at the same time in effect saying he Kirby didnt actually do anything when he was there.
 
Last edited:

miami

Established Member
Joined
3 Oct 2015
Messages
3,167
Location
UK
The BBC is becoming more absurd in its position of trying to be seen as impartial. Why does it feel it has to quote Joe Ruskin who has a following of virtually no one on anything to do with HS2. Ruskin peddles the usual contradictory line that this is a disaster for HS2 while at the same time in effect saying he Kirby didnt actually do anything when he was there.

False Balance, it's the obvious next step after you remove journalists.
 

Phil.

Established Member
Joined
10 Oct 2015
Messages
1,323
Location
Penzance
The BBC is becoming more absurd in its position of trying to be seen as impartial. Why does it feel it has to quote Joe Ruskin who has a following of virtually no one on anything to do with HS2. Ruskin peddles the usual contradictory line that this is a disaster for HS2 while at the same time in effect saying he Kirby didnt actually do anything when he was there.

He was chairman of a railway that only existed on paper. What did he do?
 

The Planner

Veteran Member
Joined
15 Apr 2008
Messages
15,949
He was a figurehead more than likely, much like the CEO of any company, what did you expect him to do?
 

edwin_m

Veteran Member
Joined
21 Apr 2013
Messages
24,912
Location
Nottingham
The BBC is becoming more absurd in its position of trying to be seen as impartial. Why does it feel it has to quote Joe Ruskin who has a following of virtually no one on anything to do with HS2. Ruskin peddles the usual contradictory line that this is a disaster for HS2 while at the same time in effect saying he Kirby didnt actually do anything when he was there.

It's Rukin. Ruskin would have been a bit more, er, poetic in his criticism.
 

najaB

Veteran Member
Joined
28 Aug 2011
Messages
30,818
Location
Scotland
What, so he's a £375,000 year correspondence clerk?
No, he's the £375K a year head of an organisation that has been prevented from 'getting on with it' because they are bogged down dealing with pointless, baseless, NIMBY objections and protests.
 

WatcherZero

Established Member
Joined
25 Feb 2010
Messages
10,272
£900m Birmingham Curzon regeneration project signed off today. 4000 new homes and extending the tram line to the HS2 station.

The money is coming about 25% from Westminster, 25% from the combined authority and 50% from the LEP through borrowing against future tax.

At the same time £1.5m each for Man Pic, Man Air and Leeds to produce similar plans promised in the last budget is now being recieved.
 

TheKnightWho

Established Member
Joined
17 Oct 2012
Messages
3,184
Location
Oxford
What, so he's a £375,000 year correspondence clerk?

Do you think that he just has to write a polite letter now and again? Or do you think it might be overseeing extensive and comprehensive reviews into each and every objection?
 

WatcherZero

Established Member
Joined
25 Feb 2010
Messages
10,272
According to Osborne in the Northwich Guardian the phase 2 route is currently planned to be published in November.
 

najaB

Veteran Member
Joined
28 Aug 2011
Messages
30,818
Location
Scotland
A cautionary tale from the excellent lowtechmagazine.com...
This is where I started to doubt the conclusions of this article:
The introduction of a high speed train connection invariably accompanies the elimination of a slightly slower, but much more affordable, alternative route, forcing passengers to use the new and more expensive product, or abandon the train altogether.
HS2 is definitely going to complement the existing network, not replace it.
 

miami

Established Member
Joined
3 Oct 2015
Messages
3,167
Location
UK
How did non hs1 services from Kent fare when the domestic high speed services started? Have they been cancelled?
 

The Ham

Established Member
Joined
6 Jul 2012
Messages
10,324
This is where I started to doubt the conclusions of this article:

The introduction of a high speed train connection invariably accompanies the elimination of a slightly slower, but much more affordable, alternative route, forcing passengers to use the new and more expensive product, or abandon the train altogether.

HS2 is definitely going to complement the existing network, not replace it.

If you use mainland Europe as your case study, then that is a fairly logical conclusion, however High Speed Rail is normally used as a way to improve journey times to attract more people to use the route.

The big difference in the UK is that the existing lines are very full and the new HS lines are going to have several trains an hour serving broadly the same places, rather than several times a day, or even week.

The other thing is that there will be serval large settlements (some with over 200,000 people) who will still require access to train services and so there will still be financially reward operating train services to them.
 

Class 170101

Established Member
Joined
1 Mar 2014
Messages
7,937
Daily Mail on Wednesday reporting Full Steam Ahead for HS2
https://twitter.com/BBCNews

Unfortunately I'm unable to paste the image here from twitter

Also mentioned albeit briefly on BBC Papers tonight.
 
Last edited:
Status
Not open for further replies.

Top