While I wouldn't usually tend to rise to such a sarky reply, I'd note that they've
already designed one, they just need orders. There are logical reasons that the franchise that literally runs through their back yard, has a track record of ordering Bombardier products and has easy access to a test track nearby in the form of Old Dalby would be the first to take the plunge.
There's the political angle too - always a lot of pressure from MPs and Councillors to keep Bombardier in business.
Not really relevant to a discussion on problems with the 800s though - I'm just saying there are plenty of other reasons that the bi-modes for the MML won't necessarily be Hitachi's IEP units.
It's not sarcastic, it's a statement of the obvious when it comes to any new type of train. There are precious few that work out of the box, unless they are evolutions of existing proven products - and a new Bombardier express bi-mode unit fitting the British loading gauge would not come into that category.
Hitachi are still working on various teething problems with the 80xs, so please tell me why it should not be the same for a Bombardier train that has not even got off the drawing board? I am well aware they have a bi-mode design, but that's a very long way off it being an actual working train, isn't it?
It's not as if there aren't posts elsewhere on this forum questioning Bombardier's build quality over many years and the Class 345s are also suffering their fair share of issues right now, or have you missed that?
There may be politics, but there's also economics and if Hitachi can offer a leasing company a no-brainer price for an 80x variant adapted to MML conditions, then other factors are likely to go out of the window.
Hitachi also have production lines to keep running and politicians in places like the North East and in areas where suppliers to Hitachi are based are just as capable of exerting pressure as those in the East Midlands.